@VladlHoff I am going back to your thinking that there was never Net Neutrality in the first place. If net neutrality never existed? Why is the FCC trying to remove it by removing Title 2? Net Neutrality was law, because the government said it was law. Therefore, companies had to obey the law. Net Neutrality was based off of Title II, so they work side by side. Title II allows companies to block things that they find offensive, while Net Neutrality prevents abuse of this by giving us the freedom to see what we want to see, so long as it is legal. These regulations work side by side to make sure that companies can protect us from things we don't want to see, but also you cannot block politics, certain websites, etc. If Title 2 is repealed, net neutrality, being based on it, will also be repealed. Title 1 will remain, allowing companies to abuse their power, making us shell out money for things we want to see. Even if the changes are gradual, internet will eventually be controlled by only the largest companies who will turn us into cash. These changes will never happen quickly!! The companies will make it very slow, seemingly invisible, until it is too late.
@VladlHoff Not anything. It is called "Good Samaritan" blocking because you must have the intent of helping people by blocking it, such as videos that Instagram "blocks" unless if you want to see disturbing content. ISP's are still not allowed to block things like political views. They are only allowed to block things that they truly believe the user does not want to see.
@VladlHoff Not so. According to your quote, it is not protecting companies from Net neutrality, but rather allowing them to block things that literally nobody wants to see. It is just like Youtube age restrictions and Google safe search.
@Pim2407 @chancey21 @Oski
@BaconAircraft @Jack2019 @diegoavion84
@BloodSky @Matimodel45 I left comments on the videos. Thank you for your entries!
@QuantausAviation wut
@DeathStalker627 np!
@Helicopterboy Yeah, I'd consider this and my 747-8 garbage.
@Helicopterboy Not my best tho.
@Helicopterboy
@Helicopterboy yeeeeeeeeep
@Hayhayjam664 Ok..... k.... alright... yep.. I. vanishes
You forgot the following
~Epic
~Stratos
~Beechcraft
~Comac
~Tupolev
~Sukhoi
~Irkut
~Piper
~Me
I have a quick and unrelated question.....
Was your Thomas the dank engine build based off of the artist rendition??
DON'T MAKE A MEME!
JK
Just make whatever pops into your head and make it look good (and obviously fly well).
@BaconAircraft Wow I never knew this...
@RailfanEthan np!
Oh wow that game actually sounds cool. It's right up my alley! I might just go ahead and check it out!
I literally just gave you a reason and a platform to roast me.
Where is me?
Where is me?
Where is me?
Where is me?
Where is me?
Where is me?
@Avro683Lancaster cool
@TheRussiansAreComing 🙂
@diegoavion84 It can be, doesn't have to be.
@BloodSky I cannot open it. Please make it:
1: A clickable link.2: Not in Google Drive.Make a link clickable by doing !-[]-(insertlinkhere)
Without the "-"
@TheRussiansAreComing I don't. Sorry.
What is wrong with society
WUUUUT
@AtomicCashew I hope you know that the advertising won't work, since tagging only works with the first three people tagged.
@Oski NO
@AtomicCashew Mail, youtube link, etc.
@503rdAirborneSoldier Only your best.
@chancey21 No, but if it is not your plane use credit.
@AceOfSpade No rotary aircraft. Only planes.
@dootdootbananabus IDK
@BroAeronautics It is possible to do it in come regions that can only support Sprint though.
@BaconAircraft lol
Here
Here
Paragraph 10 here
Paragraph 3 here
And countless more. :/
@VladlHoff
@VladlHoff The very end of the video on link one Chairman Pai literally says "Net Neutrality."
Also, when Pai set up the idea, he said that Net Neutrality's days are numbered.
@VladlHoff I would like you to first provide official documents directly saying that it is for freeing the internet.
@VladlHoff I am going back to your thinking that there was never Net Neutrality in the first place. If net neutrality never existed? Why is the FCC trying to remove it by removing Title 2? Net Neutrality was law, because the government said it was law. Therefore, companies had to obey the law. Net Neutrality was based off of Title II, so they work side by side. Title II allows companies to block things that they find offensive, while Net Neutrality prevents abuse of this by giving us the freedom to see what we want to see, so long as it is legal. These regulations work side by side to make sure that companies can protect us from things we don't want to see, but also you cannot block politics, certain websites, etc. If Title 2 is repealed, net neutrality, being based on it, will also be repealed. Title 1 will remain, allowing companies to abuse their power, making us shell out money for things we want to see. Even if the changes are gradual, internet will eventually be controlled by only the largest companies who will turn us into cash. These changes will never happen quickly!! The companies will make it very slow, seemingly invisible, until it is too late.
@VladlHoff Basically it is based off of common sense. It is up to both company and consumers what they find "offensive" and "not offensive".
@VladlHoff Not anything. It is called "Good Samaritan" blocking because you must have the intent of helping people by blocking it, such as videos that Instagram "blocks" unless if you want to see disturbing content. ISP's are still not allowed to block things like political views. They are only allowed to block things that they truly believe the user does not want to see.
@TMach5 YEET
@VladlHoff Not so. According to your quote, it is not protecting companies from Net neutrality, but rather allowing them to block things that literally nobody wants to see. It is just like Youtube age restrictions and Google safe search.
@JackTheBestBoss YES
@Squirrel I strongly agree.
@CubCraftersCo :D