Dev WNP78 Comments

  • Whitmore Wildcat v2 (challenge Entry) 7.2 years ago

    @Type2volkswagen I guess. You could also use some contraption of airbrakes (with a negative one in the centre to balance out ones on the edge) but a brake would be far more effective.

  • Craft Generator Script 7.2 years ago

    @TMach5 what python version are you using?

  • Sled 7.2 years ago

    did you know you can't actually make a smooth shape in SP without code. Because SP wouldn't work without code. SP is code (and some assets too).

  • The feature system is BROKEN? 7.2 years ago

    You know, isn't it strange that those three planes were the winners of the challenge?

    +3
  • Menu Day Night Cycle 7.2 years ago

    @14ROVI yes that would be advanced as opposed to dynamic

  • Menu Day Night Cycle 7.2 years ago

    not quite sure how that happened to be honest

  • Menu Day Night Cycle 7.2 years ago

    @jamesPLANESii @14ROVI that's advanced weather. In fact I was working on a procedural 3d cloud generator..... somehow it ended up as a procedural terrain generator tho....

  • If SimpleRockets2 has striped fuselages, then how come we can't have decals? 7.2 years ago

    @BACconcordepilot that's not really the most mobile friendly approach.

  • Menu Day Night Cycle 7.2 years ago

    @14ROVI the game already has dynamic weather..... Ever looked in Pause Menu (escape) > Settings > Game Settings ? There's a setting called "Dynamic Weather".

  • Menu Day Night Cycle 7.2 years ago

    @chancey21 not really, no... It's not how mods are designed

  • iOS Moding 7.2 years ago

    Has been asked many times. Has been answered many times. Fancy reading the "Learn about modding" section accessible via the mods page?

  • M.Corp Diplomat 7.2 years ago

    I love the steering wheel, and the decorative use of the gyro.

  • Advanced Targeting 7.2 years ago

    @chancey21 it does, except the mass indicator probably doesn't....

  • Advanced Targeting 7.2 years ago

    @chancey21 not enough time.... school

  • Craft Generator Script 7.2 years ago

    @alexchub1 python.org, the python website, probably where you got python 2 from

    +1
  • Advanced Targeting 7.2 years ago

    @pilotred233 wow... long comment!
    - The bomb accuracy is 0.25 by default I think. Try turning it up to 1
    - I just checked and it appears that the simulated bomb does not consider the bridge as something that stops it so carries on through. When the marker is at the base of the bridge, that does not necessarily mean the bomb will hit the bridge. That's something I'll have to fix...
    - The lead algorithm is an approximation. To get the exact value, I'm not quite sure but I think it's quite advanced. If you want it more accurate, increase the accuracy value in the settings
    (all settings via Mod Settings)

  • Craft Generator Script 7.2 years ago

    @alexchub1 this was made with python 3, so it probably won't work with python 2.

  • Supermarine Type 300 (small-brown-dog)1.7 7.2 years ago

    A very nice design/replica/whatever! May I say a few fine tuning points:
    - Front gear steers really slowly.
    - When retracted, front gear appears through the top of the fuselage and gets in the way of the gun sight.

  • Advanced Targeting 7.2 years ago

    @JetKwan @PorkyClown3 yes and yes.
    @Kyle123344 and... erm... no

  • Advanced Targeting 7.2 years ago

    @EternalDarkness @DeidaraEnterprises Thanks!

  • Craft Generator Script 7.2 years ago

    @MrDoolittle err, no.

    +2
  • A question on Python 7.2 years ago

    It's a snake.

    +2
  • Metric Conversion 7.2 years ago

    @ESpanop I'm not doing any maths here. Like I said in the description, it's literally a hidden switch built into the game, which this mod flips.

    +3
  • Craft Generator Script 7.2 years ago

    Did you change what was in the box at the topleft?

  • Craft Generator Script 7.2 years ago

    @CaesiciusPlanes so, you clicked generate and it said saved to SP files?

  • Craft Generator Script 7.2 years ago

    @DarthAbhinav just to clarify, this is not an act of hostility towards anyone.



    Competition feeds innovation

    +2
  • Craft Generator Script 7.2 years ago

    @CaesiciusPlanes so you're saying it's failing to load into SP? What was the function you used to generate it?

  • Craft Generator Script 7.2 years ago

    @chancey21 I just did. In the post.

  • My pic for the challenge! 7.2 years ago

    your link: https://m.imgur.com/a/HOPeH.png
    correct link: https://i.imgur.com/FQEDNhw.png

  • My pic for the challenge! 7.2 years ago

    @Flightsimulator you didn't change the link. It's actually different, you just put a .png on the end.

  • My pic for the challenge! 7.2 years ago

    adding .Jpg to the end of a page link won't make it work. https://i.imgur.com/FQEDNhw.png is the correct link.

    +1
  • Hey all! I am a new member to SP 7.2 years ago

    @FinalGambit nice. I thought bans on discord were by IP, but you seem to be still on there. Looking forward to seeing it.

  • Northrop F-5E Tiger II 7.3 years ago

    What confuses me is how this was double uploaded by two accounts? Also, the flight model in SP is an asset for unity called UnityFS, and despite Andrew working on flight simulators, that in no way means he singlehandedly made the aerodynamic model.

  • Hey all! I am a new member to SP 7.3 years ago

    Good to see someone new around here. What have you been building?

  • TS-50 Lynx (FOR CHALLENGE) 7.3 years ago

    @Othawne I know, it's the same with anything I do. Luckily you can post updates to mods.

  • TS-50 Lynx (FOR CHALLENGE) 7.3 years ago

    oh, and the corners of the cockpit block stick out of the canopy xD

  • TS-50 Lynx (FOR CHALLENGE) 7.3 years ago

    Very nice. But, you should have set zeroOnDeactivate on the extra 20* of elevator :)

  • Nukes 7.3 years ago

    @RAF100 not if you read any of the previous comments asking for it...

  • Mangle (Sexylips35's Profile Picture) 7.3 years ago

    @sexylips35 Why not?

    +1
  • Mangle (Sexylips35's Profile Picture) 7.3 years ago

    @sexylips35 exactly. So you can post them unlisted.

    +1
  • Mangle (Sexylips35's Profile Picture) 7.3 years ago

    @sexylips35 I answered that.

    +1
  • Mangle (Sexylips35's Profile Picture) 7.3 years ago

    @sexylips35 1. no
    2. you're still avoiding my question.


    In a minute I'm going to stop talking to you, because you've already been warned by a moderator if you posts any of these again without credit.

    +1
  • Mangle (Sexylips35's Profile Picture) 7.3 years ago

    By asking for a mod that already exists.

    +1
  • Mangle (Sexylips35's Profile Picture) 7.3 years ago

    @sexylips35 yes, deliberately avoiding my question.

    +1
  • Mangle (Sexylips35's Profile Picture) 7.3 years ago

    @sexylips35 I take it deliberately avoiding my question?

    +1
  • Mangle (Sexylips35's Profile Picture) 7.3 years ago

    @sexylips35 are you deliberately avoiding my question or are you struggling with the vocabulary?

    +1
  • Mangle (Sexylips35's Profile Picture) 7.3 years ago

    @sexylips35 oh, I heard there's a cool workaround to the upload limit. If you post your stuff unlisted, you can still tag the people who requested it on there, and you can upload even more per day. And you don't get people complaining about spamming for points. Of course, you can't get points for upvotes there, but that doesn't matter does it, because you're not doing this for points, are you? Right? Not at all. That's what I thought.



    /s

    +2
  • SimpleCheats - a slightly comprehensive guide 7.3 years ago

    @sebi032 sorry, but there isn't really any besides the general ones which apply to all explosive weapons (Bomb, Missile, RocketPod and RocketWeapon)

    +2
  • Mangle (Sexylips35's Profile Picture) 7.3 years ago

    @sexylips35 well, for instance, mentioning who spent days making the script you're milking points out of, or noting the creator of the script the creator of which you omit from your video explaining how to perform a simple task involving:
    1. install a program
    2. run a script
    3. enter a file path
    Or saying something other than "with python" when asked how you create them. It's quite disappointing the number of people I see who mistakenly believe you have a gram of computing knowledge.

    +2