@ChrisPy well, most of the stuff you see in the code is my overcomplicated limits for backwards flying and no AoA inputs when your stopped and stuff like that. The weight, yeah, I know now from GuyFolk and you can disable PSMs with ag1 but that does not work extremely well. This is my first attempt at a legit PSM plane so I hope I will improve greatly for my next PSM project. Thank your for all the critiques!
@PapaKernels go into the horizontal stab FT and just make it more sensitive with trim, it should be near the end of the code. And there should be FBW which provides artificial stability so you do not need to move the CoM. I know I didn't do well with the FT
Thank you to @GuyFolk for some help on this. Don't worry, every part on this plane was placed and coded by me, yes ME! But he did indeed give priceless advice and help.
@BogdanX although you would need more than just one spoiler here because of the change in dihedral and wing flex. Also, what picture do you see the spoilers in?
Not a fan of the flight model I must say tho
Well built mate
Flies. decent
@Typhoon03 for a light fighter? No way
@Typhoon03 thanks - also I watched it and its complete bs
Saying the newest light fighter will get past Mach 2
@Typhoon03 what look at that channels' most recent thumbnail!
@Typhoon03 wait!!!!
Just pointing out that was a year ago
I must say the flight model is legitimately more accurate than most planes on the site. Sad
The detail here is just... wow
@GuyFolk no problem.
That scientific diagram impresses me
Download Button No Work What I Do Worng
I know it may not be related but... it's just such a cool video. Escape the world for 7 minutes.
Liar
@Easternairlinesisnotdead too laggy
@Stinky it seems to be either T.4 or T.8
Yuck your making the gross edition...
@FlyingTraxxasRustler tube
@rexzion your stinky
@MrShenanigans read the description
Jk lmao
Did I ask?
@Ergithe thanks
@Gestour You're very welcome.
@SCP1471 hmmm
@PapaKernels is it?
@Ruvien0Republic0Officer yeah,..
@FelixTheDoggo nah look the inlets are underneath. Obviously an F-16.
@asteroidbook345 this is a predecessor to my plane--yet my plane is not a successor of this?
Probably not good enough but here, a clean, mobile friendly build.
Caricature Andrew
@ChrisPy thank you!
@ChrisPy well, most of the stuff you see in the code is my overcomplicated limits for backwards flying and no AoA inputs when your stopped and stuff like that. The weight, yeah, I know now from GuyFolk and you can disable PSMs with ag1 but that does not work extremely well. This is my first attempt at a legit PSM plane so I hope I will improve greatly for my next PSM project. Thank your for all the critiques!
@GuyFolk ok, I might revamp flight model another time. Thank you!
@PapaKernels go into the horizontal stab FT and just make it more sensitive with trim, it should be near the end of the code. And there should be FBW which provides artificial stability so you do not need to move the CoM. I know I didn't do well with the FT
@LeviTheCleaningFairy @RongahSah thanks
@JeffChandler lmao
@Simpleplayer1 thanks?
Thank you to @GuyFolk for some help on this. Don't worry, every part on this plane was placed and coded by me, yes ME! But he did indeed give priceless advice and help.
@SPC1471 actually, on second thought I would rather do this thing solo. Sorry, good luck!
@Ruvien0Republic0Officer yeah that would help a LOT
@rexzion category 6; black hole
@Ruvien0Republic0Officer lol you realize you fool nobody with that
What category are you in!
I am #2 -- absolute nobody
@FishMiner reload
The canards make me cry
@BogdanX oh yeah now I see. That is annoying that he uses default spoilers. @realSavageMan do they at least have a smooth function on them?
@BogdanX although you would need more than just one spoiler here because of the change in dihedral and wing flex. Also, what picture do you see the spoilers in?
@realSavageMan let's just say I agree with you