@Tommytheplanes267 hey FYI if you want people to respond to you, and to notice you've said something to them, you need to click "reply" next to their name and it will say "@" with their names.
.
The turboprops you need will be kind of advanced. You could theoretically just slap the stock engines on there, but I recommend forming a fuselage cover for behind the engines. On the fuselage next to the engine, set it to width:1 and height:2 and set the corners to smooth
@Ergi you mean it's very "light" not "lightly" lol I know your learning English so maybe that helps. You only use "ly" when you're doing something that way. Example:
.
You landed that lightly
That ultralight is light
.
And glad you like it! This shape really inspired me too lol
@WiiMini I saw my first A350 and that was so cool yesterday. We got to fly to Wisconsin for a funeral, I would be sad but getting to go to the airport.... very weird of me but I care about planes too much
@WiiMini free flights on American!?!?!? My favorite airline bro, their livery is nice. I would just take round-trip short haul flights ALL DAY but did I tell you about the one time that I NEEEEEEEEEOOOOOOOOORRORRRRORORRROROOR isnt that funny dude?
What is your best build in your opinion?
What build of yours DL you sidh had the most upvotes?
Do you have any siblings?
What sports do you play?
Opinions on soccer?
In relation to other things in your life, how important is aviation?
Ever flown in a plane?
Favorite type of plane?(fighter, aerobatic, airliner, casual general aviation, sport aviation, experimental aviation?)
Do you find my builds of decent quality?
Does my point count reflect my build style and quality?
If not, why not, and is my point count too low or too high?
I actually tried to download this(it is twice my part limit) and got about 2 fps... but I was able to look at some of your FT and you might want to consider this:
.
The spoilers might want to have some sort of cue to work for roll only on some occasions. I recently was fortunate enough to have made two 737 flights(one -800 and one -900) in the past 4 days and made note of the spoiler/aileron movements. And, whoops, I forgot to check the aileron FT so sorry if I am saying stuff you have already adressed.
.
The 737 and 747 are obviously different planes but they are the same manufacturer and very similar time periods of development, they might be similar a bit in flight computers and stuff. And btw all of this is coming from the right side, should be similar enough to the right.
.
The ailerons didn't move nearly at all. I knew they wouldnt move much because of stress on the wing, adverse yaw, and similar stuff but even on climbout, we pretty much used spoilers for roll, which surprised me since the ailerons are obviously more efficient.
.
On our roughly last 5-7 minutes of approach, we had the spoilers about 1/6th out on average(and changes in deflection for roll and additional speed control), although I knew our engines were not at idle as they were fluctuating both up and down in noise. Obviously, IRL you can add spoilers and also add power but that isnt a thing in SP because you need to be at idle to add brake. I assume the reason for the above is so that the engines can be spooled up and have faster reactions. And this tracks because our engines were all over.
.
To fix this, you could make a true/false setup to make sure the user is descending, slowing in speed, has over 10 degrees flaps, gear down, and any other obvious "landing soon" indications. If all parameters are met, or if maybe 80% or more of them are(I can help with FT on the 80% true thing, I have some ideas), then you could set approach spoilers, and maybe set the other 20% of parameters to the approach setup? IDK it's your choice
.
Also, on both flights, the right aileron was slightly up. Not sure about the other one, but there is a chance both flights were needing right trim, just unlikely.
. TL;DR basically add some ft to the ailerons and spoilers and otherwise thanks for reading! It may have been interesting if anything.
@PlaneFlightX thanks m8!
+1@Tommytheplanes267 hey FYI if you want people to respond to you, and to notice you've said something to them, you need to click "reply" next to their name and it will say "@" with their names.
.
The turboprops you need will be kind of advanced. You could theoretically just slap the stock engines on there, but I recommend forming a fuselage cover for behind the engines. On the fuselage next to the engine, set it to width:1 and height:2 and set the corners to smooth
@Ergi you mean it's very "light" not "lightly" lol I know your learning English so maybe that helps. You only use "ly" when you're doing something that way. Example:
+1.
You landed that lightly
That ultralight is light
.
And glad you like it! This shape really inspired me too lol
@jamesPLANESii fancy meeting you here! I figured you might like/find this lol
So are a few others. The AeroWatcher and BushWatcher are even sharper in vision!
Wonderfull
Wonderfull
@jamesPLANESii @WiiMini roughly 420 weeks per day
@WiiMini how did I ever know that?!?!?
@AzureCorp I know, it was a helpless attempt at a joke
@BagelPlane thanks!
Have fun getting blown up from the cockpit!
Can you tag me on everything? I know it will be a pain but this might help me big time :)
Do you live near LAX?
@ACEPILOT109 ayyyyy thx m8
@ACEPILOT109 ohhhhhh just a typo
Looks like a bear but... not? Weird but sick
+1.
*checks comment
Haha it is a bear
@WiiMini yep!
@WiiMini @XP and I used to live in Virginia and have been to Dulles before too, in fact used to live under the approach line of it!
@WiiMini duh I'm a idiot
@WiiMini ye.
@WiiMini I saw my first A350 and that was so cool yesterday. We got to fly to Wisconsin for a funeral, I would be sad but getting to go to the airport.... very weird of me but I care about planes too much
+1@WiiMini free flights on American!?!?!? My favorite airline bro, their livery is nice. I would just take round-trip short haul flights ALL DAY but did I tell you about the one time that I NEEEEEEEEEOOOOOOOOORRORRRRORORRROROOR isnt that funny dude?
@RachataBLUesTH it is in the quality settings
Naaaa
@WiiMini yeah I bet! Wow I was going crazy when I saw an A320 from miles away yesterday I can only imagine living next to an airport....
@tsampoy yes, yes yes, @SavageMan needs to make that as well
Two more subs and your points equals your subscribers! Congrats, I guess?
@WiiMini luckyyyyy
@rexrexThezion like... a UAV? A UAV ultralight?!??!?
@thebanbehindtheslaughter thanks mate
@KLM_747 did you read it lmao
@JCCNtechnologies but... its mobile?!?!!!
@QuitePossiblyMangled yeah
@QuitePossiblyMangled thank you,l and sorry on #2, that's a MAJOR typo! Wow! I meant to say "which of your builds do you wish had the most upvotes"
hello @ShiroNeko !
+1@QuitePossiblyMangled I guess it was a trick question
.
PS you dont have to answer ALL of mine
@QuitePossiblyMangled @Highground facepalm it is 18
What is your best build in your opinion?
What build of yours DL you sidh had the most upvotes?
Do you have any siblings?
What sports do you play?
Opinions on soccer?
In relation to other things in your life, how important is aviation?
Ever flown in a plane?
Favorite type of plane?(fighter, aerobatic, airliner, casual general aviation, sport aviation, experimental aviation?)
Do you find my builds of decent quality?
Does my point count reflect my build style and quality?
If not, why not, and is my point count too low or too high?
I actually tried to download this(it is twice my part limit) and got about 2 fps... but I was able to look at some of your FT and you might want to consider this:
.
The spoilers might want to have some sort of cue to work for roll only on some occasions. I recently was fortunate enough to have made two 737 flights(one -800 and one -900) in the past 4 days and made note of the spoiler/aileron movements. And, whoops, I forgot to check the aileron FT so sorry if I am saying stuff you have already adressed.
.
The 737 and 747 are obviously different planes but they are the same manufacturer and very similar time periods of development, they might be similar a bit in flight computers and stuff. And btw all of this is coming from the right side, should be similar enough to the right.
.
The ailerons didn't move nearly at all. I knew they wouldnt move much because of stress on the wing, adverse yaw, and similar stuff but even on climbout, we pretty much used spoilers for roll, which surprised me since the ailerons are obviously more efficient.
.
On our roughly last 5-7 minutes of approach, we had the spoilers about 1/6th out on average(and changes in deflection for roll and additional speed control), although I knew our engines were not at idle as they were fluctuating both up and down in noise. Obviously, IRL you can add spoilers and also add power but that isnt a thing in SP because you need to be at idle to add brake. I assume the reason for the above is so that the engines can be spooled up and have faster reactions. And this tracks because our engines were all over.
.
To fix this, you could make a true/false setup to make sure the user is descending, slowing in speed, has over 10 degrees flaps, gear down, and any other obvious "landing soon" indications. If all parameters are met, or if maybe 80% or more of them are(I can help with FT on the 80% true thing, I have some ideas), then you could set approach spoilers, and maybe set the other 20% of parameters to the approach setup? IDK it's your choice
.
Also, on both flights, the right aileron was slightly up. Not sure about the other one, but there is a chance both flights were needing right trim, just unlikely.
.
TL;DR basically add some ft to the ailerons and spoilers and otherwise thanks for reading! It may have been interesting if anything.
Ummmm that is longer than I expected ^^^
And good STOL but the takeoffs are :/ flies nice otherwise
@5Ewok wait.. wrong one
@5Ewok wait yayyyyy
@5Ewok awwwwwwwww
@5Ewok Haha ps you should pin my comment
makes an ultralight in 10 minutes
Well a few more votes and I am a 3,000! Epic mate
.
edit: we made 3k with this!
@XP thumbsup to you!
+1@rexrexThezion maybe look in a mirror