@IceCraft well I was referring to the length of his consist (70-85ft with 2 4 wheel coaches) but frankly the Thomas prop is actually pretty thin compared to the others
@50CalChicken yes, thus making the plane's fuselage invisible. It's also a pain doing it because you gotta set it to -0, refresh XML Tuner & set it to your preferred negative value
@PointlessWhyshouldi most aircraft or airships at the time didn't need that much space. There's solid record of an aircraft landing on the forward deck of HMS Furious, so landing on a 260 meter long flight deck would be a relative breeze
@PointlessWhyshouldi yes but the better ones were in service around the same time as Olympic's military aquisition. She wasn't even the first, seaplane tenders were already an old concept
(Insert Orgasm Sounds) so good.
+1@SPMistatopi Believe it or not it flies straighter than a fair few aircraft I’ve built
This ain’t a failure, it flies really well. That being said the engines and wings should swap places to aid it in taking off.
@HamV2 well it’s a mere glitch so anyone can do it, so feel free to do so
@IceCraft well I was referring to the length of his consist (70-85ft with 2 4 wheel coaches) but frankly the Thomas prop is actually pretty thin compared to the others
except for that 1 guy who called me a colourful collection of slurs under the Casablanca prototype this isn't for you
@50CalChicken yes, thus making the plane's fuselage invisible. It's also a pain doing it because you gotta set it to -0, refresh XML Tuner & set it to your preferred negative value
Esta máquina tem alguns controles e manuseio interessantes, mas no geral é um trabalho impressionante
@PlanePlaneThe66373637 yes I'm poor and maintaining a hilariously obsolete IPad
Can't exactly afford to spend £300 right now
This is honestly a really impressive design
@BobTheAttackChopter alright, also word of warning. The rear stabilisers are angled by 1°
@BobTheAttackChopter I wouldnt advise it. This thing handles like a fishing trawler
@MajorSix ah
I'm using that name for the heck of it now
@Zoowarp this thing has quad miniguns and a pair of cannons. Considering this is a SWAT Chopper I think that's enough
@randomusername probably not
You just deserve an upvote for that HECCIN C H O N K E R
@PointlessWhyshouldi most aircraft or airships at the time didn't need that much space. There's solid record of an aircraft landing on the forward deck of HMS Furious, so landing on a 260 meter long flight deck would be a relative breeze
@PointlessWhyshouldi yes but the better ones were in service around the same time as Olympic's military aquisition. She wasn't even the first, seaplane tenders were already an old concept
@PointlessWhyshouldi Olympic was literally the size of RMS Titanic.
@PointlessWhyshouldi we are talking about the British Empire at its peak. They could 100% afford to do it
@Skyler717 evidently I forgot something after changing a part
Why have a flying car when you can have a driving plane?
@ND40X fair
"D plus" ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
This was never intended to be even close to the scope it reached
@Sm10684 see last 2 text posts by me
@Minecraftpoweer
It's worse
Much worse
@ND40X easy enough
This is one of the best first build's I've ever seen!
@Minecraftpoweer notice the flash
Notice the shell distinctly right beneath it
T
@bps21 I gave you the Saturn on a silver platter
Maybe you should try land based aircraft
@hobbitfrog yes
Quite a unique design, but I raise a question
How does the pilot see?
@BlackhattAircraft like I was as I fell after launching into a ceiling
@CrashFighter05 how do you make it worse
@CrashFighter05 it came out in 2002
Quite a unique concept with marvellous execution
@Mustang51 this gives me more 20's/30's Soviet vibes TBH
@winterro have fun with that
I'm gonna build Northumbrian out of it.
I can't actually improve it so I'm literally copying George Stephenson
"This'll put testes on your chest"
"It's put hair on my eyeballs"
That's the vibes this gives off. I like it
Ok boomer
Get me in the screenshot Reddit
Make it 6.
I'm unlucky but stubborn
@RailfanEthan gee, why didn't I think of that?
@Zlmainka I was talking about the carriage it's on.
The Recoil would send it either through the planet or over 5 borders & an ocean
@TrislandianAlliance speeding up Brexit
Ok but seriously in relation to the fuselage that's a pretty standard ratio. The fuselage just so happens to be huge
I use an integer limit (567 million) fuel tank though. It's even exposed on some of the "bees"
Ok I know it was called the Hypermax but I HAD TO after that designation
I may have entered in something I built in April but that thing was decently good