@WereOutOfNamesArentWe I did not see the vehicle anyways on the 10+ flights I did. I used Sledriver’s Auto Trim thing cause it had good high and low speed performance, so every time I was able to take a close look at each convoy. They all didn’t have a single tank, though I still think this thing is new and not just two vehicles stuck together.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/Forums/View/1225297/The-entire-SP-Community-will-probably-hate-me-for-this-but?showAllComments=true#comment-3239554
please read this. Behind the hate, just take at least something helpful (link cannot work so just copy and paste into the bar) @KnightOfRen
@AbuHafsh cause it would be more civilized if we don't bring that up. It adds to anger, making us sound less helpful and more hateful to him. Besides, with those big dramas we've had through this year, I think a lot of us are tired of another large one happening.
@AbuHafsh Hey let's try not talk about his behavior here. This is about his strangely high upvote counts, and talking about that here may cause a drama
Ok everyone, I've decided to do some research into this cause I was curious where it started. KoR has been tagging people on his builds ever since his first one. It appears he had originally done it to show to his former friend, Cobrahuey, what he had made. After a few builds, he had began adding people into tagging through requests and through asking. The first unsolicited tagging that happened (I think) was with Dclass, since I couldn't find any interactions between the two before he began tagging them. I may be wrong.
@WarHawk95 yeah he was talking about the "quality usually has more upvotes" thing and probably deleted his comment cause it's technically prolonging drama.
@BogdanX usually meaning not all the time, i find that more upvotes usually means that people just liked the plane. This is a strange case though.
(also pls no bring up gc here)
I think that instead of him spending time on tagging people in his posts he should be really be taking some advice. He doesn't take kindly to negative criticism, only looking at the positive ones, even promoting it. Hopefully he changes this and looks at both, cause his fellow friends appear to be babying him instead of providing some useful advice to help his planes fly better.
It's actually cause he farms upvotes. If you scroll down on his builds (and forum posts), he basically tags a bunch of people, with and without their consent. The people tagged are then obligated to upvote it, which is reflected by the peculiarly low download/upvote ratio on his builds.
Some issues with this plane I am aware of (and cannot fix) is that when you unload the car, the plane is considered detached from the main cockpit (which is in the car so that the cannon works), so as you are flying without the car, you are not using your own fuel, but rather, the car's. I've added some more fuel in the car because of this.
Oh yeah, and either reduce the elevator's deflection in Overload, or simply make the elevator's control surfaces a little smaller. The plane easily stalls out cause that elevator.
When I first saw this Corsair, I was a little worried about the flying characteristics, but holy crap it's good. The plane is decently maneuverable, and I believe some of my planes would have a hard time dealing with it given it's high speed. I'd saw a downside would be the cockpit, if it was XML'ed to look more blunt, it would look more Corsair-like, and it's missing decals (I am totally fine with that, heck I don't decal my planes, I just was a little surprised since your last two had some). Another one could be the gear's position. I agree with that retraction system being cool, but if the gear was angled more to the wing's dihedral it would have looked more smooth with the plane. Keep up the good work ValtTeck, your planes are a great combination of simple and charm. :)
Some tips for this plane: Adding smoothing on the cockpit windshield would make it look better, and coloring it with a color that gives off more of a "gloss/semi-gloss" shine would look nicer than using the flat colors. Also, adding an activation group for the turret's gun and rotator would be nice, too. I love your little planes!
@ACEPILOT109 Sure! You just mentioned that you were drawing plans so yeah.
this plane is actually kinda cute
@ACEPILOT109 bruh share plans please
I wonder where the convoy's files are?
+3@BagelPlane Either it was fake or it was censorship.... hm......
RIP the post got deleted, guess it was fake after all...
@BagelPlane I think the plane I'm using for these recon flights is strong enough, since it appeared to have survived a bunch of hits from AA tanks.
Wait the new "tank" is that aggressive?
@WereOutOfNamesArentWe I did not see the vehicle anyways on the 10+ flights I did. I used Sledriver’s Auto Trim thing cause it had good high and low speed performance, so every time I was able to take a close look at each convoy. They all didn’t have a single tank, though I still think this thing is new and not just two vehicles stuck together.
@RAF1 if that's true I just wasted 2 hours of my life flying to Maywar from Wright repeatedly just to see this occurrence
I'm doing some recon right now, haven't seen anything like it...
+1Awesome! It's crazy that it has only 48 parts!
+1ah yes another he-162 ripoff called the Skink
I may or may not have made one too lol
@KnightOfRen well you can always make one, besides it’s free and allows you to have a place to upload images of your plane to use in your descriptions
+1@KnightOfRen How is not having discord relevant to this?
@EternalDarkness Thank you so much.
@SavageMan Yeah the fact you created this on your iPad is like the same thing as someone making a really detailed plane on mobile lol. Good job!
+1@DeezDucks oh yeah tru
@EternalDarkness Suggestion on that, can there be a warning sent to those that do it, and if they keep doing it, it would result in a tempban?
FleetingBrightness has spoken
+9Question, what about unsolicited tagging?
@KnightOfRen I mean like links.
Also, do you realize why people are confused/mad?
@SavageMan Maybe you could have used more glass? I just searched a a picture of the complex and it looks pretty reflective.
+1@SavageMan Were the buildings there actually supposed to be made of that? IMO, the buildings could use more light....
+1@KnightOfRen give me examples of this "destructive" criticism then.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/Forums/View/1225297/The-entire-SP-Community-will-probably-hate-me-for-this-but?showAllComments=true#comment-3239554
please read this. Behind the hate, just take at least something helpful (link cannot work so just copy and paste into the bar) @KnightOfRen
@KnightOfRen send me the link then. There was no forums before the Sopwith, so link me.
I come back and already there is a ton of drama :(
You did really well with the shading! There’s some perspective issues with the bottom two, but they turned out nice too!
+1@AbuHafsh cause it would be more civilized if we don't bring that up. It adds to anger, making us sound less helpful and more hateful to him. Besides, with those big dramas we've had through this year, I think a lot of us are tired of another large one happening.
+7@AbuHafsh Hey let's try not talk about his behavior here. This is about his strangely high upvote counts, and talking about that here may cause a drama
+1Ok everyone, I've decided to do some research into this cause I was curious where it started. KoR has been tagging people on his builds ever since his first one. It appears he had originally done it to show to his former friend, Cobrahuey, what he had made. After a few builds, he had began adding people into tagging through requests and through asking. The first unsolicited tagging that happened (I think) was with Dclass, since I couldn't find any interactions between the two before he began tagging them. I may be wrong.
+8@Hellosss38 it got those upvotes cause people liked it, and thought it was cool. KoR's planes got most of their upvotes cause of mass tagging.
+6@WarHawk95 yeah he was talking about the "quality usually has more upvotes" thing and probably deleted his comment cause it's technically prolonging drama.
+3@BogdanX usually meaning not all the time, i find that more upvotes usually means that people just liked the plane. This is a strange case though.
+1(also pls no bring up gc here)
What I said may or may not be taken into consideration by the knight. I hope it does.
+2@SavageMan eyyyy bedrock gang
Anyways that's pretty impressive. Question about those brown buildings... what blocks did you use for them?
100 downloads babyy
I think that instead of him spending time on tagging people in his posts he should be really be taking some advice. He doesn't take kindly to negative criticism, only looking at the positive ones, even promoting it. Hopefully he changes this and looks at both, cause his fellow friends appear to be babying him instead of providing some useful advice to help his planes fly better.
+14It's actually cause he farms upvotes. If you scroll down on his builds (and forum posts), he basically tags a bunch of people, with and without their consent. The people tagged are then obligated to upvote it, which is reflected by the peculiarly low download/upvote ratio on his builds.
+20@FoxTrotOne Thank you! I will look into it soon
@tsampoy but
@Pita Actually that's a fictional one that's supposed to resemble the K-7, but larger. It's not realistic, but it's a cool dieselpunk vehicle
We have now been vectored and stuckbugged, what’s next?
+5@FLOWRIDER0
@Highground
@Jake_
@KnightOfRen
Some issues with this plane I am aware of (and cannot fix) is that when you unload the car, the plane is considered detached from the main cockpit (which is in the car so that the cannon works), so as you are flying without the car, you are not using your own fuel, but rather, the car's. I've added some more fuel in the car because of this.
This plane is a bruh moment, it flies nice but I hate it's armament
Oh yeah, and either reduce the elevator's deflection in Overload, or simply make the elevator's control surfaces a little smaller. The plane easily stalls out cause that elevator.
When I first saw this Corsair, I was a little worried about the flying characteristics, but holy crap it's good. The plane is decently maneuverable, and I believe some of my planes would have a hard time dealing with it given it's high speed. I'd saw a downside would be the cockpit, if it was XML'ed to look more blunt, it would look more Corsair-like, and it's missing decals (I am totally fine with that, heck I don't decal my planes, I just was a little surprised since your last two had some). Another one could be the gear's position. I agree with that retraction system being cool, but if the gear was angled more to the wing's dihedral it would have looked more smooth with the plane. Keep up the good work ValtTeck, your planes are a great combination of simple and charm. :)
Some tips for this plane: Adding smoothing on the cockpit windshield would make it look better, and coloring it with a color that gives off more of a "gloss/semi-gloss" shine would look nicer than using the flat colors. Also, adding an activation group for the turret's gun and rotator would be nice, too. I love your little planes!
+1Recommendation: Make the gun move using a rotator that can be moved with VTOL, and make it activate with an activation group. This plane is awesome!
+1