@ReinMcDeer @Th3Missil3
Also performance points!
One rotor is like 19 performance points 19 X 4 = 76 not including the bomb, detacher or fins. So 6 will be more than 456 performance points. And this is also without details.
@LunarEclipseSP
I just drove it now and what KtaAviation said was pretty valid (although I think it's cause of the mandatory input system). Other than that though, it drives awesome and looks awesome with all the details! Might borrow that 'turbo' if you don't mind...
Oh well I know where and when lol... Sorry..
@NAFASIRO
T! Where and possibly when?
@florky
Thanks
Also do I wait for the output? It seems to be unresponsive.
What else can I make with that?
Nice, although the fuselage kinda looks like the ACE combat Nosferatu from the side
@florky
You know what? It really does look like it
@DatMaluchGuy19
Thought you might like to see this.
This real orrr?
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes
Good one...
@FluffyWaffle45
+1You should enter This Challenge.
@NAFASIRO
Thanks!!
@32
Well whenever you do. I'm not really sure how to go about the body work but I have learned a lot about suspensions!
Should also update my bio... Eh... Future problems for future ToeTips...
@DatMaluchGuy19
+1Much appreciated bro!
@MrCOPTY
+1God that's true, that diamond shape being so difficult to replicate.
@MrCOPTY
+1Thank you "LightBringer"!
@MrCOPTY
+1Thanks my man✊
@DatMaluchGuy19
+1Yup! I'm going back to my roots as an S.P player
@ImZerkkZxe
Yeah i do!
@LoneSpaceGaming
@ImZerkkZxe
@Bluestboi
@DatMaluchGuy19
@MrCopty
@32
@Windshifter1
@4planes
@WADA
@Neruneten21
@Zaineman
@ImZerkkZxe
+1Thanks for the push! 10K!
😂😂🤣
Structural integrity left the chat
@ImZerkkZxe
Okay my guy
Hol up @LoneSpaceGaming
Will it still VTOL?
T
Saved to sub assembly armory
+3@Khanhlam
Boeing: Slaps canopy You can fit so many fifth gen fighters in here!
@ZeroWithSlashedO
"Why are you gae"
@ReinMcDeer @Th3Missil3
+1Also performance points!
One rotor is like 19 performance points 19 X 4 = 76 not including the bomb, detacher or fins. So 6 will be more than 456 performance points. And this is also without details.
Auto tag me
+1@AverageUMP45Simp
+1Don't worry I know, plus it made me chuckle a bit.
@Sm10684
You can adjust the FT and the steering angle does help. Also down force and 'grippy' tires also help.
@LoneSpaceGaming
Alright!
@LoneSpaceGaming
Eh, if life has taught me anything, is that there's more fishes in the sea, so there's no need to rush
@DTMF
Thanks
@ImZerkkZxe
+1Thanks
@LunarEclipseSP
+1Okay thank you!
@LunarEclipseSP
+1I just drove it now and what KtaAviation said was pretty valid (although I think it's cause of the mandatory input system). Other than that though, it drives awesome and looks awesome with all the details! Might borrow that 'turbo' if you don't mind...
@V
Do control bases work for low physics?
@KtaAviation
Can I put the code on a rotator? It still serves the same function
Who's the girl in the picture? She looks very cool!
+1@LoneSpaceGaming
Not gonna lie, I do, although like I said we could just make separate versions to post individually?
@LoneSpaceGaming
Oh? Well I mean it's still possible to make two separate versions.
@LoneSpaceGaming
Exactly...
@LoneSpaceGaming
The latest SU-57 he posted
@LoneSpaceGaming
Oh and she didn't answer?