I would say use fuselages for wings, and learn about custom control surfaces and landing gear, but it seems like you mostly make cars. In that case, I cannot help you. (I’m an iOS builder too).
Oh, and you can pin comments.
@Noname918181 I am basing it off of the Lancaster, but it is gonna be different.
@jamesPLANESii MOAR. DAKKA. And the side turrets are more there for additional firing support.
@LockheedLover *whistle *
Before you continue, may I recommend taking time on one to make it look really, really good? Like me, for instance, I always try to challenge myself to learn something new with every build, and I’m trying to learn detailing and camouflage now. Just take one of your projects and add fuselage parts for wings, or add some hollow fuselages on the outside to make it look like paneling.
I think we should clear some things up here. On my list, I’m currently reorganizing everything based off of how much of a payload it can carry. Here’s how I’m grading:
For fighters:
Light: minimal levels of missiles (0-2), no bombs, or all guns.
Medium: Moderate levels of missiles (3-10), a couple bombs (less than 1,000-2,000lbs, depending on missile load)
Heavy: lots of missiles (10+), heavy bomb load (2,000+lbs)
For bombers:
Light: 10,000-10,000lbs Bomb load, small size
Medium: 10,000lbs-40,000lbs Bomb load, small-medium size
Heavy: 40,000+lbs Bomb load, massive size
.
Notes: plane can be smaller than normal size, but it has to be realistic. A fighter-sized aircraft cannot be a heavy bomber, and a bomber-sized aircraft cannot be classified as a fighter.
@LockheedLover Well, at least in this universe, heavy bombers seem to be straight winged, slow, and absolutely MASSIVE. I’d leave it as is, and just continue on with a new heavy bomber.
That’s what I’d do, though. I’m currently working on a British heavy bomber based on the Avro Lancaster, with a pinch of Tu-95 in it.
@LockheedLover It’s not about the size, it’s about the weight. The Argus has a payload weight, at least in this model, of 56,604 lbs (20x Boom 50s, 16x Cleavers, 4x Guardians), while yours has a payload weight of 8,500 (30x Boom 25s, 2x Boom 50s, no ATA weapons). Classification of bombers has almost always been about the weight it can carry, not about the amount.
When did this happen? And where? And what?
I would say use fuselages for wings, and learn about custom control surfaces and landing gear, but it seems like you mostly make cars. In that case, I cannot help you. (I’m an iOS builder too).
Oh, and you can pin comments.
T
Yes, definitely, absolutely.
Wut
@Megamonster @Strucker will do it first, correct? Then I’ll go after him and touch it up.
@FranzPeterSiegfried Crash already said he’d help, but thanks for the offer!
@FranzPeterSiegfried Ayup
I don’t mind being put in this.
Looks baller AF
Don’t know what that means, but I assume it’s good
Good to see you back!
@Jim1the1Squid Don’t worry, I left that in my review.
@Jim1the1Squid Still applies. Lol
Or better yet, you haven’t raged enough when your plane gets deleted due to the undo glitch
@Nerfenthusiast That makes sense. Or the pilot inside decides to get rid of them anyways due to panic
There are times where I go underwater but still have weapons, but that’s only if I skim or go slightly under the water.
No, not in the near future
Glad you’re back! Fantastic work as usual!
Delicious. Finally, some good bombing food.
@AZAMGAMING
P
Strucker starts.
@Strucker that’s fine!
@JamesBoA the community. It’s still a budding community, not as full force as here
Cool. Strucker, wanna go first, then have me go next?
Edit: nvm, you already said it
@Megamonster ok, that sounds cool.
@Megamonster I can try.
@Megamonster I use this site, but I can’t do custom thumbnails.
@AZAMGAMING ooooooohhhhhhh, RIP your CPU then.
@CrashFighter05 It was an old laptop (5+ years old)
@CrashFighter05 Sweet! I’ll tag you in the prototype.
My computer had a hard drive failure a while back, and now I’m waiting to save up for a new one. I get how you feel.
@JamesBoA It’s still pretty young.
Would you care if I put this under the Soviet Union?
@Noname918181 I am basing it off of the Lancaster, but it is gonna be different.
@jamesPLANESii MOAR. DAKKA. And the side turrets are more there for additional firing support.
@Noname918181 Oh, I guess I missed that. Thanks!
@HarrisCraft wut? Then how are you able to make formations?
@Noname918181 they work fine for me.
@HarrisCraft yw! I wish I could have cool squadron pics like that, but I’m an iOS player, and can’t figure out how to do that.
Suh-weeeeeet!!
@Cashewisacoolcat ah ok
@Sm10684 tagged the wrong guy, buddy. @Planeacceleration
@LockheedLover Oh, right. Whoops, sorry about that (‘´v`)
@Sm10684 sorry, couldn’t resist.
That’d be a really flat toilet.
@CruzerBlade I think I know, but it’s been a while since I’ve been on.
@LockheedLover *whistle *
Before you continue, may I recommend taking time on one to make it look really, really good? Like me, for instance, I always try to challenge myself to learn something new with every build, and I’m trying to learn detailing and camouflage now. Just take one of your projects and add fuselage parts for wings, or add some hollow fuselages on the outside to make it look like paneling.
@LockheedLover Those would classify under naval attack.
That’s a lot of planes.
I think we should clear some things up here. On my list, I’m currently reorganizing everything based off of how much of a payload it can carry. Here’s how I’m grading:
For fighters:
Light: minimal levels of missiles (0-2), no bombs, or all guns.
Medium: Moderate levels of missiles (3-10), a couple bombs (less than 1,000-2,000lbs, depending on missile load)
Heavy: lots of missiles (10+), heavy bomb load (2,000+lbs)
For bombers:
Light: 10,000-10,000lbs Bomb load, small size
Medium: 10,000lbs-40,000lbs Bomb load, small-medium size
Heavy: 40,000+lbs Bomb load, massive size
.
Notes: plane can be smaller than normal size, but it has to be realistic. A fighter-sized aircraft cannot be a heavy bomber, and a bomber-sized aircraft cannot be classified as a fighter.
@LockheedLover Well, at least in this universe, heavy bombers seem to be straight winged, slow, and absolutely MASSIVE. I’d leave it as is, and just continue on with a new heavy bomber.
That’s what I’d do, though. I’m currently working on a British heavy bomber based on the Avro Lancaster, with a pinch of Tu-95 in it.
@LockheedLover It’s not about the size, it’s about the weight. The Argus has a payload weight, at least in this model, of 56,604 lbs (20x Boom 50s, 16x Cleavers, 4x Guardians), while yours has a payload weight of 8,500 (30x Boom 25s, 2x Boom 50s, no ATA weapons). Classification of bombers has almost always been about the weight it can carry, not about the amount.
@TheKraken3 Or Kraken Technologies, Kraktech for short.