The new upvote system does not show deleted accounts upvotes inside the post. That means that the people who deleted accounts after upvoting still count for the total number outside of the post, but inside, it only shows the accounts that still exist. (This happens on other posts too, just the disparity is not as large)
The real number is outside the post.
@ThatKindaWeeb
Yeah, that would be nice. No need for hiding wings inside of fuselage. But if they did a cross sectional editor, like in flyout, that would be just perfect.
@ComradeSandman
Not bad at all. I would suggest using calamity to rime with tragedy in some of the places, to avoid repetition. And the last paragraph is a bit awkward. But other than that, it is quite good. That second to last paragraph is just perfect, 10/10 May as well change your username to Shakespeare.
@Graingy
That’s not how I meant it. Yes, obviously you care about who reads it, I was saying who cares about the reminder, as it was not assigned to me.
@SajabAerospace
lol. Also, I suggest you replace one of the tags with the VR tag, so that way the devs will test it, and if they think it is ok for SPVR they will curate it. (Meaning even more people can see it, and fly it.)
Cockpit is pretty good, so it would probably be ok.
The number of thumbnails lol
+1Plywoodmouth
+1@Graingy
+1Nope ;)
The new upvote system does not show deleted accounts upvotes inside the post. That means that the people who deleted accounts after upvoting still count for the total number outside of the post, but inside, it only shows the accounts that still exist. (This happens on other posts too, just the disparity is not as large)
+1The real number is outside the post.
Good luck! See you soon! (I hope;) )
+1T
+1@Majakalona
+1Well, its a funny thing, but the people who pirate the game are almost always lazy, and almost never work very hard.
hmmmm
Yeet bois?
+1@Zaineman
+1Yep, I just got back from testing it. Its quite fun to fly.
@Zaineman
+1Lol. Thanks ;)
@Zaineman
+1Oh lol, got here too early. I see the other comment now.
Wth?
+1English gardenburgers
+1Jk.
Congratulations!
+1T
+1I like hyper-saber.
+1@Majakalona
+1lol. That is not what I was referencing.
@Majakalona
+1Lol.
@ThatKindaWeeb
+1Yeah, that would be nice. No need for hiding wings inside of fuselage. But if they did a cross sectional editor, like in flyout, that would be just perfect.
@ThatKindaWeeb
+1Yeah. And it would mean that the total number of parts on builds could be significantly lowered.
Cool idea. I doubt it will be that detailed (at first anyway)but a way to group mesh parts would be awesome.
+1Wheeeeeee!
+1@SajabAerospace
+1Just btw, congratulations! Your plane is now curated for VR!
@Rob119WithA105mmHowitzer
+1Hi.
@Graingy
+1Lol
Nice! Thumbnail was awesome. I like that type.
+1Its a very hungry bear ;)
+1T
+1@FishbedFive
+1Hmm. Maybe talk to @Monarchii? He loves stealing kneecaps.
@Majakalona
+1Its 11 parts.
@Majakalona
+1Another pfp change lol.
I am sad now.
+1@Majakalona
+1We will see… they all say that.
@Graingy
+1Look on this monster, and be afraid.
@Majakalona
+1I would guess slowstone, as it is quite tall.
What in the actual ####???
roblox chat filter has kicked in
+1@Rb2h
+1Yeah, next time use wing-2 from the start, to avoid that.
@Omoriboy
+1Oh lawdy lawdy, what have thou done?
@ComradeSandman
+1Not bad at all. I would suggest using calamity to rime with tragedy in some of the places, to avoid repetition. And the last paragraph is a bit awkward. But other than that, it is quite good. That second to last paragraph is just perfect, 10/10 May as well change your username to Shakespeare.
Wow, this thing is ancient!
+1@Graingy
+1Depends. Sometimes, they even just use blocks.
Change all wing parts from wing-3 to wing-2 in overload, and then reconnect the parts. It will fix the problem.
+1@Graingy
+1That’s not how I meant it. Yes, obviously you care about who reads it, I was saying who cares about the reminder, as it was not assigned to me.
And there are also several links near the bottom of the description, (the credit ones) which could be made clickable, just for ease of use.
+1@SajabAerospace
+1lol. Also, I suggest you replace one of the tags with the VR tag, so that way the devs will test it, and if they think it is ok for SPVR they will curate it. (Meaning even more people can see it, and fly it.)
Cockpit is pretty good, so it would probably be ok.
Out of spotlights :(
+1Remind me later please, this deserves one.
Why don't you make a clickable link though at the beginning? You do them like this:
+1[text that you want to be clickable](link)Wow. This is just awesome. The amount of work you put into this, and it just looks so good!
+1Just waiting for the submarine to implode like: 🤩
+1T. Lol, at first I thought the submarine one was flying, and that was weird.
+1