@YEEEETplane Yes. Connecting a rocket to a detacher and then activating the detacher will fire the rocket, but if you do not want the rocket to fly off after activation, connect the rocket to the detacher and another part of your aircraft.
selfDestructTimer
Setting this to some ridiculously large value such as 9999999999 will keep it from exploding for about 317 years (at 9999999999 seconds).
You can angle the main rotor a few degrees forward, or add a rotator to manually rotate it.
You could also add a rotator to the base of the tail rotor, so that it can be angled backwards after enough forward speed is gained (assuming you have a vertical stabilizer). A V-STAB should mostly counteract torque from the main rotor if you're going fast enough.
Is it single-rotor or dual-rotor?
If it's single-rotor, it needs a tail rotor. Though this may not completely stop the spinning. Your main rotor may also be spinning in the wrong direction.
@ThereIsNoahScape Hmm. I think discord works for this as well (if you have discord).
Other than that, I don't have another solution.
You might try searching the website for answers.
@ZeroWithSlashedO You wouldn't be entirely incorrect...
It is based on the X-29.
The next VSRA is going to based on the X-31.
However, it isn't a replica.
@CalebRepublic That's one way of doing it. Personally though, I prefer XML modifying the size of the stock jet engines, and putting them in a fuselage shell.
The sound, prop-blur effect, and RPM limitations of using propellers as jets is rather annoying.
But it works fine as a ducted-fan engine in this scenario, and it can be used in the WW2 challenges and propeller-only races.
@Aviator01 I might try that for a jet afterburner in the future.
However, since this is a ducted-fan engine and technically not a jet engine, I most likely won't add exhaust.
Thanks for the suggestion!
@ThereIsNoahScape In the future, try using different connection points on a part. Connecting the rotation end to the center attachment point of the rudder seems to work well.
I'm assuming there is supposed to be an image. However, it is not visible.
You might try using postimages.org, and if it still doesn't work, try re-uploading the image with a different URL.
Link to the aircraft.
@YEEEETplane Yes.
@YEEEETplane No problem!
@YEEEETplane Yes. Connecting a rocket to a detacher and then activating the detacher will fire the rocket, but if you do not want the rocket to fly off after activation, connect the rocket to the detacher and another part of your aircraft.
selfDestructTimerSetting this to some ridiculously large value such as
9999999999will keep it from exploding for about 317 years (at9999999999seconds).@MrCOPTY Thanks!
+1Thoughts or suggestions? Let me know!
@Echostar
@Dragoranos
@MrCOPTY
@BeastHunter
@Aviator01
@GildedCroissant
@Soardivision160th Ah, ok.
You can angle the main rotor a few degrees forward, or add a rotator to manually rotate it.
You could also add a rotator to the base of the tail rotor, so that it can be angled backwards after enough forward speed is gained (assuming you have a vertical stabilizer). A V-STAB should mostly counteract torque from the main rotor if you're going fast enough.
@LeaveUsAlone Thanks!
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/WDPDSg/C900-VSRA-2CANCELED-PROJECT
@GrandmasterPotato That's probably the reason.
In my experience, resizable wheels drift at high speeds.
You may need to change some traction settings.
@GrandmasterPotato Does the aircraft use custom landing gear with resizable wheels?
@Usatiger Try reversing the spin direction of the main rotor.
@GildedCroissant Thanks!
Is it single-rotor or dual-rotor?
If it's single-rotor, it needs a tail rotor. Though this may not completely stop the spinning. Your main rotor may also be spinning in the wrong direction.
@ThereIsNoahScape Hmm. I think discord works for this as well (if you have discord).
+2Other than that, I don't have another solution.
You might try searching the website for answers.
@ZeroWithSlashedO You wouldn't be entirely incorrect...
It is based on the X-29.
The next VSRA is going to based on the X-31.
However, it isn't a replica.
The screenshots are not visible.
+1Try using postimages.org. If it still doesn't work, try reuploading the images under a different URL.
You could try replacing the tail rotor yaw input with
+1Yaw-(YawRate*0.05).You may need to change the number for more or less sensitivity.
Link to the aircraft.
Link to the aircraft.
Link to the aircraft.
@CalebRepublic That's one way of doing it. Personally though, I prefer XML modifying the size of the stock jet engines, and putting them in a fuselage shell.
The sound, prop-blur effect, and RPM limitations of using propellers as jets is rather annoying.
But it works fine as a ducted-fan engine in this scenario, and it can be used in the WW2 challenges and propeller-only races.
@MrCOPTY Ok, will do.
@TheGliderGuy Thanks!
@JamesG771 No problem!
@Aviator01
@BeastHunter
@LeaveUsAlone
@xNotDumb
Thoughts or suggestions? Let me know!
There shouldn't be any issues. There are videos longer than 5 minutes on the website, so uploading should be fine.
@PPLLAANNEE Oh no.
+1Link to the update post.
@MrCOPTY That is classified information.
+1@MrCOPTY Sure.
+1@Aviator01 I might try that for a jet afterburner in the future.
+1However, since this is a ducted-fan engine and technically not a jet engine, I most likely won't add exhaust.
Thanks for the suggestion!
@MrCOPTY Ah, I see.
+1I am curious, did I request a tag?
+1Great aircraft by the way, considering it's made from basic parts.
@ThereIsNoahScape In the future, try using different connection points on a part. Connecting the rotation end to the center attachment point of the rudder seems to work well.
+1@ThereIsNoahScape As HuskyDynamics said, manually connecting parts seems to fix it.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/knkrcp/king-air-15-FIXED
Are you sure that the rotator is connected properly to the V-STAB itself?
+1The rotating end might be connected to the V-STAB, instead of the base end.
Thoughts or suggestions? Let me know!
I'm assuming there is supposed to be an image. However, it is not visible.
You might try using postimages.org, and if it still doesn't work, try re-uploading the image with a different URL.
@ChamDel7 I'll consider it. I haven't made any official plans at the moment regarding interior designs.
@X99STRIKER Ah, I see.
+1Nice one.
@X99STRIKER ?
+1@AEGIS No problem!
+1Try
+1clamp(VTOL, -1, 0).Additionally, you can look at this for more information on the
clampfunction.