@Rework Thanks!
I actually have done most of the flight testing, and its flight characteristics are to my liking.
But you are welcome to post an improved or "reworked" version of the aircraft after it's released.
Very nice! I tested the aircraft and it does perform as needed.
There is small problem with the airbrakes colliding with the missiles when deploying the airbrakes. There is also a missing airbrake on the left side of the aircraft, but it poses no significant problem.
The top missiles will also destroy the aircraft if they are deployed while the airbrakes are open.
Other than that, the aircraft works great!
I've checked connections, XML properties, and tried multiple methods to fix the issue. However, I couldn't find a solution.
There's a possibility that it's a bug of some sort, but I could be wrong.
You can reduce the WWII propeller engine to just the propeller by setting hide to true under CowlFlaps. This will give you much better engine power in a smaller space compared to the smaller propeller engine.
@ThereIsNoahScape I'm fairly certain that it's a De Havilland Comet.
Edit: the Comet has the squared windows similar (if not identical) to that which is shown in the picture, and it also has a similar nose shape to that of a Comet, so my final guess is the Comet.
@asteroidbook345 I didn't know either, until I found out while looking through older
+1partTypeid's.@OUGHTO It can be done by changing the
+1partTypefield via the XML editor.The game still contains the old
partTypecodes for the older parts.Autotag: @MrCOPTY
Thoughts or suggestions? Let me know!
T
@Kiv Thanks! I'm glad you like it!
@SPXML Thanks!
+1@MrCOPTY
Thoughts or suggestions? Let me know!
@MrCOPTY Generally I only tag people who have requested tags.
But, if you would like, I can always tag you on an aircraft post.
Link to the aircraft.
Link to the aircraft.
@BeastHunter
@Rework
Thoughts or suggestions? Let me know!
Click [here.](URL)@Rework Thanks!
+1I actually have done most of the flight testing, and its flight characteristics are to my liking.
But you are welcome to post an improved or "reworked" version of the aircraft after it's released.
Very nice! I tested the aircraft and it does perform as needed.
There is small problem with the airbrakes colliding with the missiles when deploying the airbrakes. There is also a missing airbrake on the left side of the aircraft, but it poses no significant problem.
The top missiles will also destroy the aircraft if they are deployed while the airbrakes are open.
Other than that, the aircraft works great!
@HamV2 Sure! I would highly recommend installing yaw control for the best VR experience. Most likely by using a rotating flight control stick.
@XAircraftManufacturer I should also mention that the unarmed aircraft is actually only 65 parts.
I've checked connections, XML properties, and tried multiple methods to fix the issue. However, I couldn't find a solution.
There's a possibility that it's a bug of some sort, but I could be wrong.
@CRATE52PART2 Ah yes, I remember that.
@asteroidbook345 Yep, I'm familiar with that aircraft.
+1@XAircraftManufacturer Simple, yet functional.
+1Thoughts or suggestions? Let me know!
It should be labeled as
+1Fire Weaponsin the control settings menu.@Sharkfin227 Thanks!
Link to the aircraft.
Link to the aircraft.
Link to the aircraft.
@weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
@MrCOPTY
@X99STRIKER
@NARGII
@BeastHunter
Thoughts or suggestions? Let me know!
@asteroidbook345 Ok, thanks!
@asteroidbook345 Would moving the nose wheel backward also work?
You can reduce the WWII propeller engine to just the propeller by setting
hidetotrueunderCowlFlaps. This will give you much better engine power in a smaller space compared to the smaller propeller engine.@ThereIsNoahScape I'm fairly certain that it's a De Havilland Comet.
Edit: the Comet has the squared windows similar (if not identical) to that which is shown in the picture, and it also has a similar nose shape to that of a Comet, so my final guess is the Comet.
It works now.
The link causes an "Error 404: Page Not Found".
+1@Dragoranos This?
Thoughts or suggestions? Let me know!
@Sparky6004 FRIDGE.
+1@Winterfield That might be a good idea for a future post.
@Winterfield Have you tried
14.49.119.147? That's the one currently being used as the main server.@PPLLAANNEE Heh, that's an interesting idea. Maybe I should make a second version with guppy fish colors.
Note: if you want better flight performance, change the engine horsepower from 2000hp to 2500hp (the number is 5000 for 2500hp in the XML editor).
@DejmianXYZ I tested it, and it does fly significantly better at 2500hp.
Thanks for the suggestion!
Unfortunately, after doing some experimentation, I was unable to find a solution.
+1However, someone else may have a solution.
I'll experiment with this and try to find a solution.
+1Thoughts or suggestions? Let me know!