@griges That might be a good place to start. Like I said, I have very little experience with PID controllers and only know the basics. It'll likely take a while to get it tuned just right.
Also, no problem! If you want, you can bookmark this page to your browser so you can refer back to the comment.
@griges
The Target is the value you want the controller to achieve.
The Current is the variable that you want to be controlled (it can be Altitude, AngleOfAttack, or pretty much any data value). The controller will attempt to change whatever the Current is so that it's equal to the Target value.
The p value (proportional) is how much output the controller should give.
The i value (integral) is how quickly the controller should try to meet the Target value.
The d value (derivative) is how careful the controller should be. This is to prevent overcorrecting/overshooting the target value. It's essentially an input dampener for the controller.
The Target, p, i, and d values are supposed to be numbers (though I'm pretty sure the Target value can be a different data value as well).
The format should look like this: PID(Target, Current, p, i, d).
An example of what this could look like: PID(0, AngleOfAttack, 0.005, 0.001, 0.0025).
@griges I've considered this.
I have a bit of experience using PID controllers, but not enough to make a forum about it.
There's actually a Funky Trees guide that breaks down PID controllers here.
When using postimages.org, it should give you the option for what type of image link you want. Use the Direct Link option and not the Link option.
When Jundroo can find the time to do so.
SimplePlanes isn't dead. The simple fact is that Jundroo has greater priorities at the moment with Juno (formerly SimpleRockets2).
I'd also like to note that Andrew himself stated that they would be paying more attention to SP this year. It's not improbable that we may get an update towards the middle/end of the year.
@ReinMcDeer It works quite well actually. It takes a bit of getting used to flying the thing because the elevons tend to induce asymmetric drag while using Pitch and Roll at the same time. It'll sideslip a bit while turning unless you give some yaw input.
@ReinMcDeer This is a true flying wing.
It uses YawRate and AngleOfSlip programmed into hidden airbrakes.
I also gave it some slack on the stability to have a little more drift (like a pre-fly-by-wire flying wing).
Interesting. I'd seen asin() acos() atan() listed in the Funky Trees guide but wasn't aware that an atan2() was present.
Now I'm curious if sinh() cosh() tanh() are present as well.
Depends on the plane and propeller specifications (not the engine, just the prop on its own).
I'm also by no means an expert on props. These are just basic things to consider.
I'd recommend trying different pitches to see what works best.
@BeeEngineer While the M50 was unable to pass Mach 1, the wing design was not the only factor.
There have also been several examples of aircraft that had/have delta wings with straight/mostly straight trailing edges, and I can't find sufficient data suggesting that they had significant issues with it.
So while it may present such challenges realistically, it really shouldn't present a large issue if the aircraft is aerodynamically and structurally sound.
If you have an article regarding trailing edge flow in this manner, could you provide a link? I've been unable to find one that addressed this specifically.
@MalkaAmilaine @SOVIET1991 @alexJgameYTukraine000000
Jundroo can't do anything about mods for mobile devices.
As far as I'm concerned, Google removed modding capabilities.
In the case that adding mass isn't favorable, you can also take the large rotator and scale it down to your liking (it doesn't have the same joint flex problem).
The startup engine flame effects may or may not be included in the final version. If you think it should be included in the final version, let me know!
The original video/audio can be found here.
Este é de longe um dos projetos de aeronaves particulares mais interessantes.
Muito bom, gosto muito!
Nota: peço desculpas se estiver usando a tradução errada. Corrija-me se eu estiver.
@griges That might be a good place to start. Like I said, I have very little experience with PID controllers and only know the basics. It'll likely take a while to get it tuned just right.
Also, no problem! If you want, you can bookmark this page to your browser so you can refer back to the comment.
@32 I completely forgot about that. That would explain it.
@griges
The
Targetis the value you want the controller to achieve.The
Currentis the variable that you want to be controlled (it can be Altitude, AngleOfAttack, or pretty much any data value). The controller will attempt to change whatever theCurrentis so that it's equal to theTargetvalue.The
pvalue (proportional) is how much output the controller should give.The
ivalue (integral) is how quickly the controller should try to meet theTargetvalue.The
dvalue (derivative) is how careful the controller should be. This is to prevent overcorrecting/overshooting the target value. It's essentially an input dampener for the controller.The
Target,p,i, anddvalues are supposed to be numbers (though I'm pretty sure theTargetvalue can be a different data value as well).The format should look like this:
+1PID(Target, Current, p, i, d).An example of what this could look like:
PID(0, AngleOfAttack, 0.005, 0.001, 0.0025).@griges I've considered this.
I have a bit of experience using PID controllers, but not enough to make a forum about it.
There's actually a Funky Trees guide that breaks down PID controllers here.
@griges No problem!
And yes, those ` marks will prevent the image from appearing.
@griges Yes.
@griges I'm not seeing it (yet).
If it continues to not function, try using Discord instead.
@griges Those marks that insert
red textalso should not surround the image link text, otherwise it will not work.@MLGHerobrine Haha, I understand, no problem!
+1@griges Hmm... Let's test this. Copy this into the description as-is:
When using postimages.org, it should give you the option for what type of image link you want. Use the Direct Link option and not the Link option.
When Jundroo can find the time to do so.
+4SimplePlanes isn't dead. The simple fact is that Jundroo has greater priorities at the moment with Juno (formerly SimpleRockets2).
I'd also like to note that Andrew himself stated that they would be paying more attention to SP this year. It's not improbable that we may get an update towards the middle/end of the year.
Screenshot guide.
Online photoshop.
These two should serve as a decent basis for creating better thumbnails.
@Maosulli Yes.
+1@pcgmr It wouldn't work.
Google removed modding support for mobile devices.
⊥
+1@p2013125 I think it's been mentioned that they would like to do that, but it's not top priority at the moment.
@Maosulli Did you copy the entire command?
@ReinMcDeer It works quite well actually. It takes a bit of getting used to flying the thing because the elevons tend to induce asymmetric drag while using Pitch and Roll at the same time. It'll sideslip a bit while turning unless you give some yaw input.
+1@ReinMcDeer This is a true flying wing.
+1It uses YawRate and AngleOfSlip programmed into hidden airbrakes.
I also gave it some slack on the stability to have a little more drift (like a pre-fly-by-wire flying wing).
Type "T" for tag requests.
@Maosulli Type this command into the command console:
+1say "your message with quotes"
@L0RR3B0RR3
Interesting. I'd seen
+3asin() acos() atan()listed in the Funky Trees guide but wasn't aware that anatan2()was present.Now I'm curious if
sinh() cosh() tanh()are present as well.@CarMakerFry20 No. That IP is no longer valid.
The backup server IP changes with DDOS attacks.
@32 A soldier saluting. It's a bit chopped on mobile devices.
+1⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣴⣶⣾⣿⣿⣿⣦⣄⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
+4⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢰⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣤⡶⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣤⣶⣿⣿⠟⠁⢠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣄⣤⣴⣶⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⠁⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣤⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣤⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⠉⠙⠛⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣁⣀⡀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣤⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⢀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣤⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⣰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣄⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠘⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠈⠻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠙⠻⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣇⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡀
@xcong
160.251.58.131 - Main server.
61.82.248.121 - Backup server.
Would older/current builds even be compatible with such a change though?
+2⊥
⊥
Depends on the plane and propeller specifications (not the engine, just the prop on its own).
+1I'm also by no means an expert on props. These are just basic things to consider.
I'd recommend trying different pitches to see what works best.
Set
+1preventBreakingon the pistons totrue.Acceleration, weight, speed, turn rate, and thrust are probably the main ones.
+3@SimpleStudent That's the primary multiplayer server IP, not their personal IP.
@ReturnOfJeffChandler I don't think Google Translate will be able to help you here.
@BeeEngineer While the M50 was unable to pass Mach 1, the wing design was not the only factor.
+1There have also been several examples of aircraft that had/have delta wings with straight/mostly straight trailing edges, and I can't find sufficient data suggesting that they had significant issues with it.
So while it may present such challenges realistically, it really shouldn't present a large issue if the aircraft is aerodynamically and structurally sound.
If you have an article regarding trailing edge flow in this manner, could you provide a link? I've been unable to find one that addressed this specifically.
Autotag: @MrCOPTY
Autotag: @Bo1233
@funnyplaneman
@FlightFun
@BeeEngineer
@Applefan2019
@AirJMCAviation
@weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
@GabrielSatori
@AWACSgodess
@Planebuilder2123
@Mistral
@ThatRandomCouchPotato
@Bryan5
@KtaAviation
@Phox
Thoughts or suggestions? Let me know!
@MalkaAmilaine @SOVIET1991 @alexJgameYTukraine000000
Jundroo can't do anything about mods for mobile devices.
As far as I'm concerned, Google removed modding capabilities.
@Hiimakeplanes The site's been down for a bit.
In the case that adding mass isn't favorable, you can also take the large rotator and scale it down to your liking (it doesn't have the same joint flex problem).
Congrats!
+1Type "T" for tag requests.
The startup engine flame effects may or may not be included in the final version. If you think it should be included in the final version, let me know!
The original video/audio can be found here.
Este é de longe um dos projetos de aeronaves particulares mais interessantes.
+1Muito bom, gosto muito!
Nota: peço desculpas se estiver usando a tradução errada. Corrija-me se eu estiver.