the SU-34 being comparable to the F-15E and F-111 is a bit of an overstatement
the SU-24 and F-111 should be the ones being compared to each other
and even the F-15E with the SU-30SM or J-16
I get your frustration but its a game where you can post anything. If you want high quality builds, just use the tags feature, it is there for a reason.
@Noname918181818181818181 exactly, we are not even annoying him, we are saying on how we feel about his builds, that is how he is going to improve as a builder.
@TheNewSPplayer @JuliaAircraft Let him get criticism. Do you want him to improve as a builder? then let him listen, let him learn; we would respect him if he just did that instead of deleting our comments when we gave our criticism to him. You two act like we are attacking him, but all we want is for him to accurately scale his plane because it's a replica after all. I don't care if it's 3 feet shorter or 3 feet longer; all his planes are 10–20 feet longer than the actual planes he is trying to recreate. His F-16 is the size of an F-14, and hell, even the Beechcraft King Air 350i, which is a really small plane, is about the same size as an F-14. Do y'all really think I got my skills for building planes from nowhere? No, that is because of constructive criticism. I listen to it instead of making reasons, so why can't he do the same thing as well?
@TheNewSPplayer again, why would you let the people here resize it instead of him?? you don't have to defend him too much, just let accept the criticism instead saying "just do it yourself"
@JuliaAircraft my guy just accept the constructive criticism for him, if you want him to improve then let him accept what the people feel, you are defending him way too much.
why does your f-35 have a sonar?
wouldn't that fry the pilot?
when you eat, you swallow
+1took you long enough
concord
huh?
@OkaNieba ah good cuz i wanna modify it to look like the official concept art of the NATF-22
+1release the sea raptor
+1does this man use his tentacles on himself?
+1@RosaCossetteDelise wait nvm nvm its in the correct side
+1the probe is on the wrong side
+1the SU-34 being comparable to the F-15E and F-111 is a bit of an overstatement
+2the SU-24 and F-111 should be the ones being compared to each other
and even the F-15E with the SU-30SM or J-16
"discrimination of mobile players"
+1"I do not care if the build cant run your decade old phone, I will build more high part builds"
@LunarEclipseSP somewhere along that line, MAPA if he used proper blueprints and are scaled properly and PEA if it has more parts
+1@Graingy because the actual F-4 had them irl in all models, they are RWR domes
hot af
@VeroViper AAAHHHH
@TTL man really sent an unclassified document
+1@ThatOnePiaz you can either make a newer post or edit the xml but then again it will not really gain that much attention if you just updated the xml
@ThatOnePiaz here
@ThatOnePiaz do you want the fixed version? i have it
because it barely looks like a flanker
+1lamprey
rizz
+1I get your frustration but its a game where you can post anything. If you want high quality builds, just use the tags feature, it is there for a reason.
+2the f-22 is not an attack aircraft
+1that thumbnail tho, i like it
+3pretty sure you don't have to be gold or plat to know how to build something good
+3weird haircut
+1@FlyingPatriot the YA-9 had auto trim?
the a-10 if it was good
add a ski jump you got Kuubo Ibuki
+1@ArshvirPlayz I love you
@OkaNieba yeah the F-2 was actually based on the agile falcon concept except the canopy is different
+1the F-2 also has a 4 piece canopy instead of the 2 piece that is found on the F-16C
+1the F-2A has a much bigger wing span and a bigger elevator than the F-16C
+1you just answered your own question
+2@KenzarAircraft that's not even a teen series fighter
I think you forgot to unlist it
@ilovea330 there is no way for the missile to turn to the target without ignition
ignitionDelay
my guy we know its an F-5, you don't have to censor the designation
@KenzarAircraft the Protos are not included
+1can i finish it?
i am doing the entire teen series
@L3FT2R1GHT my guy its only constructive criticisms, criticisms can make you a better builder.
@Noname918181818181818181 exactly, we are not even annoying him, we are saying on how we feel about his builds, that is how he is going to improve as a builder.
+1@TheNewSPplayer @JuliaAircraft Let him get criticism. Do you want him to improve as a builder? then let him listen, let him learn; we would respect him if he just did that instead of deleting our comments when we gave our criticism to him. You two act like we are attacking him, but all we want is for him to accurately scale his plane because it's a replica after all. I don't care if it's 3 feet shorter or 3 feet longer; all his planes are 10–20 feet longer than the actual planes he is trying to recreate. His F-16 is the size of an F-14, and hell, even the Beechcraft King Air 350i, which is a really small plane, is about the same size as an F-14. Do y'all really think I got my skills for building planes from nowhere? No, that is because of constructive criticism. I listen to it instead of making reasons, so why can't he do the same thing as well?
+2@TheNewSPplayer again, why would you let the people here resize it instead of him?? you don't have to defend him too much, just let accept the criticism instead saying "just do it yourself"
+1@JuliaAircraft my guy just accept the constructive criticism for him, if you want him to improve then let him accept what the people feel, you are defending him way too much.
@MAPA again the size has nothing to do with the AI spawning, I literally have a low part eurotyphoon that is accurately scaled and it actually spawns
+1@MAPA the size has nothing to do with AI spawning, theres a reason why tutorial planes and twin props spawn