It's like an M1 Abrams had a baby with a freaking Panzer III. You need to SLOPE that front by a lot more to make it look 'better' IMO, but otherwise cool!
This is pretty great for a phone build! I'd suggest remembering a turret ring next time. It's always a bit disconcerting to see a turret just sitting on a tiny rotatory.
The tail looks a bit too flared out and a touch ugly, but other then that, beautiful plane!
I'd also suggest using U.S. designations for aircraft. This would be a FA (or F/A) Fighter/Attacker instead of just an Attacker. There's few pure attackers operating in the western world right now, and this doesn't really meet the criteria for a pure ground attack aircraft.
@atgxtg Well, thanks! Really though, I spent only a single night making this. It's sorta crap. ^_^; But I do agree with the buoyancy. Might make a sea-landing variant soonishkies if I get up to it.
@RailfanEthan There's a lot of really good suspension models, but after testing a few I just went with this because it's both simple and it works really well both on and off roads.
@sandyshores You tail is a 'normal' tail piece. Get Overload and Fine Tuner ASAP, and use a Structural Wing, since those don't flap around, and use Fine Tuner to edit in the ability to add flaps. It's pretty easy all things considered, and if you don't have the ability, then just DL a craft that does and save the wing.
Wings should be further back and with less of an angle, with a straight junction between them and the fuse. Tail is pretty close, but don't be afraid to 'hide' the engine (and any other part) inside something like a backwards inlet, and double the inlets up so you can get that 'lip' that the tail sits on.
Take a look around at the top-rated planes to figure out how people did their better designs, then take a look at the blueprints, and see about re-making this because you have plenty of promise!
Pretty good for a first timer!
Get Finetuner and Overload mods ASAP, then take a look at some of the more detailed models out there to figure out building techniques.
My suggestion? Don't be afraid to make things with larger part counts, that will take longer to build. People spend quite a lot of time making their crafts look and act awesome, and it's honestly worth it.
Only criticism I can say is that it needs a fancier cockpit! You have a low part count so feel free to make the cockpit a bit more dynamic and smoothed out!
@MPlanes I would suggest returning to this design and making it much, much bigger. It's about the size of a patrol boat, and not big enough for a landing pad, non-the-less stable enough for high-power rocket launches. Also, don't be afraid to make it tall, wide, long, ect, and add a nice bottom to it. More parts and complexity isn't a bad thing!
It's like an M1 Abrams had a baby with a freaking Panzer III. You need to SLOPE that front by a lot more to make it look 'better' IMO, but otherwise cool!
Add some of the more essential details (like a cockpit, or drone eyes), then you'll definitely get me.
I'd say give the wings sharper leading edge. Take a look at the Stratofortess and how it's wings look in terms of thickness. Otherwise, looks good!
+1German Space Magic: The Gun
@CrashFighter05 The power of the 90s and ugly box cars!
@Vidal99977 It's an emoji for saluting. Was popularized by EVE Online if I remember correctly.
o7
Love everything about this except the cockpit.
@BogdanX I was going to add it, but decided not to. This car has been annoying me far too much.
Will give suspension when I make a police version outta it.
FOR THE GOD EMPEROR!
May this post live!
Good show! It's easier to use a gyroscope though. Play around a bit and XML mod one to see what results you can get without RCS!
I ruined 69 upvotes. Sorry. :P
The Little Bus That Could
@breitling Are you fat shaming my heli? Also totally stealing that for a song eyoooo~!
@JettStorm More like an F-18 IMO. Honestly can't go wrong with an F-18 build!
This is pretty great for a phone build! I'd suggest remembering a turret ring next time. It's always a bit disconcerting to see a turret just sitting on a tiny rotatory.
The tail looks a bit too flared out and a touch ugly, but other then that, beautiful plane!
I'd also suggest using U.S. designations for aircraft. This would be a FA (or F/A) Fighter/Attacker instead of just an Attacker. There's few pure attackers operating in the western world right now, and this doesn't really meet the criteria for a pure ground attack aircraft.
+1@spefyjerbf It's good! Just gotta be careful to not burn out. The late-game grind is actually getting better, and the story missions are killin it!
@Ephwurd TWWWOOOO GRAKATA!
@LiamW THUMBSUP INTENSIFIES
+1@atgxtg Well, thanks! Really though, I spent only a single night making this. It's sorta crap. ^_^; But I do agree with the buoyancy. Might make a sea-landing variant soonishkies if I get up to it.
That's a much smarter stabilizing system then I came up with, and that's an awesome CWIS system!
Good job!
@BaconRoll ...This is a brilliant idea. I'm glad I thought of it! :P
@RailfanEthan There's a lot of really good suspension models, but after testing a few I just went with this because it's both simple and it works really well both on and off roads.
BTW, thanks everyone!
@BaconEggs I've gone through so many variations that I finally decided to just stop and go 'Z! THAT'S IT! WE'RE DONE!'
Intensive mouse wiggling
+3@sandyshores You tail is a 'normal' tail piece. Get Overload and Fine Tuner ASAP, and use a Structural Wing, since those don't flap around, and use Fine Tuner to edit in the ability to add flaps. It's pretty easy all things considered, and if you don't have the ability, then just DL a craft that does and save the wing.
My Coats need many guardings, yes.
+5@Carbonfox1 "We're cool too, right? Right...? We're basically the navy, but with style!"
@desertkid8 A what now?
Very nice!
0/10 there's no 'Throw Doctor Off Plane' action. Not realistic enough.
Wings should be further back and with less of an angle, with a straight junction between them and the fuse. Tail is pretty close, but don't be afraid to 'hide' the engine (and any other part) inside something like a backwards inlet, and double the inlets up so you can get that 'lip' that the tail sits on.
Take a look around at the top-rated planes to figure out how people did their better designs, then take a look at the blueprints, and see about re-making this because you have plenty of promise!
Pretty good for a first timer!
+2Get Finetuner and Overload mods ASAP, then take a look at some of the more detailed models out there to figure out building techniques.
My suggestion? Don't be afraid to make things with larger part counts, that will take longer to build. People spend quite a lot of time making their crafts look and act awesome, and it's honestly worth it.
Only criticism I can say is that it needs a fancier cockpit! You have a low part count so feel free to make the cockpit a bit more dynamic and smoothed out!
+1@PriyanshuRoy As someone who's made H's, it's either one way or another and there's bloody autorotate or sweet spot.
@BlazeInfinity I agree with this. I say add and offset the other 'half' island on a jut from the side. Would give a cool visual.
Giveth this manwom all the points! The Sea Gods demand it!
This is a beautiful jet!
+1Cyka blyat rush b Pingu!
+1That's adorable. You've already got me as a follower, so please keep it up!
@jamesPLANESii I keep forgetting to do that. ;-;
@Milo1628xa Si mi amigo.
@SSSvaSSa That was quick!
@Ilikepotatos O bby
Best Korea
@MPlanes I would suggest returning to this design and making it much, much bigger. It's about the size of a patrol boat, and not big enough for a landing pad, non-the-less stable enough for high-power rocket launches. Also, don't be afraid to make it tall, wide, long, ect, and add a nice bottom to it. More parts and complexity isn't a bad thing!
I would say re-make this. Elongate and take some cues from the F-35 and some Russian designs. Can greatly increase payload as well if you do that.
@Jfalix Re-download and try again? It works for me, but again, the rotators are glitchy and crappy to work with in general.