Thanks @nickasaurusrex -- thought more people had seen the show. Kind of a newer version of the "Firefly" series. The Raza model used on the show is kinda vague, so this one is based on the original artist's concept for the show.
Well that expensive trick was needed for carrier ops, I concur. On SP simulation, at least I gave it correct in-flight dihedral wings. Thx @Jacobhardy64
@Delphinus True VTOL in SP is extremely tricky, not suited for this platform model. Gotta start from scratch since my un-posted VTOL model files vanished at the recent SP upgrade. Anyway, thanks for commenting.
@Delphinus OK -- I should have specified runways +grass (yes, tested). The Tiny is a very extreme "controlled crash" platform, and you were brave to try it. A completely new model, with airbrakes, would be needed.
Okay. But look at the results. On this parculiar kind of build, the left & right sides are no longer perfectly smooth. I've also posted plane models that worked well, but had non-smooth fuselages. Not going to do that anymore, FYI. @grantflys
Anyone who wishes to copy this body (it's simple) and improve their version has my permission. @nickasaurusrex @Delphinus @JacobHardy64 @jheffernan @PlanesAndThings @Garuda1
Because I like the Mig-21 design as well! Hint: this type of build where the fuselage requires lots of clipping really cannot be mirrored, gotta do one side at a time, which is slow but effective.
Thanks @jheffernan -- Yes re pitch, but this Heavy model needs to be around 500 feet altitude and 600 mph before proceeding level over the ocean to 900-1,000 mph speeds at 3,000 feet for controlled turning. Ergo, the take-off pitch is strong.
Agree per pitch, this could have been tweaked, but since level, gentle control worked in-flight, the excessive pitch is needed for runway launch. @nickasaurusrex
Thanks @nickasaurusrex -- I lost all subassemblies on 2 platforms due to SP new-releases. But the original simple A-12 design is a very efficient one (built for the USAF as a missile-launching fighter).
With a test fuselage-rebuild test I got it to perform uncontrolled loops. First, correct the center section wing since there are 2 overlayed (hidden) panels attached. Good luck- it will perform better, maybe, with only half the engines there now!
Thanks @nickasaurusrex -- thought more people had seen the show. Kind of a newer version of the "Firefly" series. The Raza model used on the show is kinda vague, so this one is based on the original artist's concept for the show.
Thanks @TheLatentImage
Thanks @nickasaurusrex
Thanks! @nickasaurusrex
Thanks, this took a while to build, but the unique design is classic @WWIIPlaneBuilder
Thanks @PlanesAndThings
Thanks @Dynimerous
Good control, good flight!
Thanks @Delphinus
OK, like this concept. Still submit one entry.
Well that expensive trick was needed for carrier ops, I concur. On SP simulation, at least I gave it correct in-flight dihedral wings. Thx @Jacobhardy64
Thanks @Dynimerous
Thanks @Jacobhardy64
@Delphinus True VTOL in SP is extremely tricky, not suited for this platform model. Gotta start from scratch since my un-posted VTOL model files vanished at the recent SP upgrade. Anyway, thanks for commenting.
With VTOL slider full up, this contraption actually flys!
@Delphinus OK -- I should have specified runways +grass (yes, tested). The Tiny is a very extreme "controlled crash" platform, and you were brave to try it. A completely new model, with airbrakes, would be needed.
Thanks @draymond
Thanks this glider was fun @Delphinus
Thanks @nicasausursrex
Thanks @AceMcCloud -- For me, it was a very experimental learning experience to arrange that replication front cone!
Thanks @JShay
Thanks @Aviation
Thanks @JShay
Thanks @AnonymousUser99
Thanks @AnonymousUser99
Thx for the comment, I can re-build assemblies as needed, just takes a while... @JShay
Okay. But look at the results. On this parculiar kind of build, the left & right sides are no longer perfectly smooth. I've also posted plane models that worked well, but had non-smooth fuselages. Not going to do that anymore, FYI. @grantflys
Thanks @AndrewGarrison
BTW @JShay I'll attempt an entry to this challenge, if my iOS platform cooperates. No beta parts needed, but will use your cockpit, of course.
The update already happened on my Amazon Fire Android SP platform -- I lost all planes pending posting and all subassemblies.
Flys great, Simple, I like it!
Yep. Gotta use what I've aleady posted, which is only about 1/2 of what pended posting. Now, so far, my iOS version is intact. @Delphinus
Anyone who wishes to copy this body (it's simple) and improve their version has my permission. @nickasaurusrex @Delphinus @JacobHardy64 @jheffernan @PlanesAndThings @Garuda1
Thanks @PlanesAndThings
Thanks @Garuda1
Because I like the Mig-21 design as well! Hint: this type of build where the fuselage requires lots of clipping really cannot be mirrored, gotta do one side at a time, which is slow but effective.
Thanks, the key was a very light model with proportional pure-delta wings. @nickasaurusrex
Thanks @jheffernan -- Yes re pitch, but this Heavy model needs to be around 500 feet altitude and 600 mph before proceeding level over the ocean to 900-1,000 mph speeds at 3,000 feet for controlled turning. Ergo, the take-off pitch is strong.
Agree per pitch, this could have been tweaked, but since level, gentle control worked in-flight, the excessive pitch is needed for runway launch. @nickasaurusrex
Thanks @JacobHardy64
Thanks @Delphinus
Thanks @nickasaurusrex -- I lost all subassemblies on 2 platforms due to SP new-releases. But the original simple A-12 design is a very efficient one (built for the USAF as a missile-launching fighter).
With a test fuselage-rebuild test I got it to perform uncontrolled loops. First, correct the center section wing since there are 2 overlayed (hidden) panels attached. Good luck- it will perform better, maybe, with only half the engines there now!
Thanks @grantflys
Thanks @Sergo585
Thanks @nickasaurusrex -- I was surprised by the glide of this model, it was only a test, but I had to post it.
Thanks @Dynimerous
Thanks @ramjet. -- I am catching up on SP posts. I'll look at yours.
Thanks @IceDragon416
Thanks @K692