Great! Dunno where you put all that fuel, at first flight this crashed my iPad Air. For other testers: pull up quick! The landing gear will not get me to the end of the Tarpley runway.
Yes, those engines stress SP simulation to it's limits. BTW, that's also what the real Blackbird did to real atmospheric conditions everyday it flew -- the titanium wings glowed red in-flight, and the leading edges glowed white when it was at top speed. For the record, top speeds have never been revealed. I do not know how fast it really was. @Fearoflightning
@JovianPat AC Carrier-airborne- or Launch to Orbit Spacecraft. AC Carrier was very sluggish on Jundroo. This engine requires my testing prior to a build.
@TheLatentImage Just realised that this moderator role should transcend the Reddit free-for-all brawl. Good luck, ask me if I can ever provide value-added ideas in the future.
Wings & powerful t-tail here are great! (Canards unnecessary on this model, that's your call). Set the inner (yellow) wing supports to semi-dihedral, add a bit of fuel near the nose, and it's very stable & fun to fly.
@Fearoflightning Amen to that. The real article has dual-cycle conventional jet/ram jet functional engines. The ram effect cuts in above Mach 1. My latest post Gen 6 Recon Mach 4 has dual-cycle engines in a quasi-F22 body. Check it out, you may want to borrow these engines.
Thanks @PlanesAndThings This first model of mine to use new fuselage blocks has kinks in it, when I find out what caused them, I'll post even better planes/boats for the community to enjoy.
Thanks @TheLatentImage this is my first model with all-new-fuselage blocks, and highly modded Blasto engines (The ACT=1 engine is clipped inside the outer one). Somebody, don't know who shared this clipped engine, many thanks to whoever did it!
Bandit is the most challenging, you have to get airborne Quickly! Tartly or Murphy work, I used all three. This model jinks to the left (hard) on takeoff -- dunno why-- then stabilizes when airborne. @Delphinus
@AnonymousUser99 I could not get it to fly, so I added fuel and re-positioned intakes. Just posted. I'll delete the post, it's your model. Download save and test recommended.
@grantflys OK I didn't have the newer fuselage parts to streamline the front & aft model for
fuselage, the wing-plan is an F-8 replica. The newer parts have been posted for the F-8 Crusader model by others, so I hope you'll like the other models better. This post is merely a munitions request by Rohan.
I agree and thanks! @nicasausursrex
Silly flys! Good idea!
This one I s easy to fly, folks. Faster model upcoming.
Thanks @PlanesAndThings
@Exumer Thanks. But I built this from scratch, it may or may not resemble an operational AC.
Great! Dunno where you put all that fuel, at first flight this crashed my iPad Air. For other testers: pull up quick! The landing gear will not get me to the end of the Tarpley runway.
Excellent looks, balance, and control!
Nice build, keep it up!
Incredible detail, love this model, and the "J" version did have six-bladed props!
Thanks for posting!
Yes, those engines stress SP simulation to it's limits. BTW, that's also what the real Blackbird did to real atmospheric conditions everyday it flew -- the titanium wings glowed red in-flight, and the leading edges glowed white when it was at top speed. For the record, top speeds have never been revealed. I do not know how fast it really was. @Fearoflightning
Nice C-130! Best launch was at Tarply runway.
Good web management idea. Will start to implement tags on prior posts, thanks.
Double check. "Wepage not Available on @TheLatentImage post. What's up with Amazon Android SW? @AndewGarrison
Sidenote @AndrewGarrison this will not download on my Amazon Fire quad-core fast Android. FYI.
Great! Vertical tail not needed, a simple mod and this is the updated stealth Spirit Bomber!
Flys great. forget the silly Tarpley Oceanview digital course markers! This one needs higher altitudes.
I'll think about this one. The Stock SP Oceanview Speedway was kinda a joke, IMHO. I could build a new AC for this Tarpley quiz. Thinking, maybe.
Thx @jacobhardy64 The original credit is due to @TommySchramm13 who built this model.
@JovianPat AC Carrier-airborne- or Launch to Orbit Spacecraft. AC Carrier was very sluggish on Jundroo. This engine requires my testing prior to a build.
Outstanding Reno Racer, easy to enjoy and fly!
Please copy and use my tweaked post of this plane. It's your build, and I like the plane, basically.
Couldn't get it to fly, posted it again with very minor tweaks. This is a fabulous airplane!
Copy my post, and then I'll delete it OK?
@TheLatentImage Just realised that this moderator role should transcend the Reddit free-for-all brawl. Good luck, ask me if I can ever provide value-added ideas in the future.
I like this challenge, but WWII AC were technically US Army Air Corp. I think you mean jets, correct?
Thanks for upvote fora truly unstable beta platform (but fun) @Dynimerous
I'll figure out some platform that needs this beast. Great work!
Wings & powerful t-tail here are great! (Canards unnecessary on this model, that's your call). Set the inner (yellow) wing supports to semi-dihedral, add a bit of fuel near the nose, and it's very stable & fun to fly.
@Fearoflightning Amen to that. The real article has dual-cycle conventional jet/ram jet functional engines. The ram effect cuts in above Mach 1. My latest post Gen 6 Recon Mach 4 has dual-cycle engines in a quasi-F22 body. Check it out, you may want to borrow these engines.
Thanks @PlanesAndThings This first model of mine to use new fuselage blocks has kinks in it, when I find out what caused them, I'll post even better planes/boats for the community to enjoy.
Thanks, it's your smart bombs (green) .... @Rohan
Thanks @TheLatentImage this is my first model with all-new-fuselage blocks, and highly modded Blasto engines (The ACT=1 engine is clipped inside the outer one). Somebody, don't know who shared this clipped engine, many thanks to whoever did it!
Bandit is the most challenging, you have to get airborne Quickly! Tartly or Murphy work, I used all three. This model jinks to the left (hard) on takeoff -- dunno why-- then stabilizes when airborne. @Delphinus
Thanks. I also like to fire weapons from these models, bombs OK, missiles better, IMHO. @ghostface4595
A tricky model to build, even with new update SP features. Flys great!
@AnonymousUser99 I could not get it to fly, so I added fuel and re-positioned intakes. Just posted. I'll delete the post, it's your model. Download save and test recommended.
Thanks @AnonymousUser99
Gets around on the ground!
Thanks @Delphinus @AnonymousUser99
Nice looking, easy to fly!
@Earthbenderrwefa Thx!
@Earthbenderrwefa Thx!
@draymond Thanks, and you're correct at full throttle. Normal controls can be re-established with power off.
@ramjet Yes, liked and upvoted it!
@Beast34 Thanks!
@grantflys OK I didn't have the newer fuselage parts to streamline the front & aft model for
fuselage, the wing-plan is an F-8 replica. The newer parts have been posted for the F-8 Crusader model by others, so I hope you'll like the other models better. This post is merely a munitions request by Rohan.
The front gear got messed up during posting, so I'll update the fixed version.
Thanks @AnonymousUser99
@Delphinus Thx indeed this one is not in production.
What's with the red shirt? @SFR