50.4k Stingray Comments

  • Narada (Star Trek) 9.9 years ago

    Yes, this requires a desktop, and thank you! @Layne

  • No. 1 Punk Fighter 7,000 mph 9.9 years ago

    Thank you @Ctracerx2 ... This model and future WIP posts will likely defy SP physics. Because, sometimes, they use modded -288 lb fuel tanks posted by @Ctracerx2

  • F14 Tomcat Top Gun 9.9 years ago

    Thanks you, @Ctracerx2 ! I guess most users do not realize or test the variable wing sweep.

  • TheOwlAce Uber Graf-Zepplin-B 9.9 years ago

    @TheOwlAce here is your big Uber Graf-Zepplin-B back. Less fuel, but still way to big for a mobile. A nice idea, here, hope you enjoy.

  • LS-17 Bear VTOL (fixed) 9.9 years ago

    Simple to take-off, and the pitch is just fine. Excellent VTOL/STOL!

  • Sport Helicopter (Sly HX140) 9.9 years ago

    Now you go and show the rest of us how to build helicopters (sigh). This is 100% functional and a fantastic model!

  • F-X 97 "phoenix" 9.9 years ago

    Simple beauty. I love the water take-off approach!

  • 0WaterAircraftChallenge-Stingray-Chopper 9.9 years ago

    Thank you, @Delphinus

  • 0WaterAircraftChallenge-Stingray-Chopper v3.0 9.9 years ago

    Good upgrade! Was designed to use a flat non-lifting rotor. At 50% power (no more) I can easily fly this upgrade from Tarpley to Murphy and back.

  • Walrus Parts 9.9 years ago

    Thx PM'd them, they responded, apparently there was no scheduled Amazon upgrade. No big deal, then, hopefully it was user error, lol. @WalrusAircraft

  • Uber Graf-Zepplin-B 9.9 years ago

    I'd have to modify it on my desktop, and repost to do that. With your permission, only. @TheOwlAce

  • Uber Graf-Zepplin-B 9.9 years ago

    Ik. Smaller size&weight needed. @TheOwlAce

  • Uber Graf-Zepplin-B 9.9 years ago

    Mobile Friendly next, so we can test it?

  • Walrus Parts 9.9 years ago

    Looks like something I can use, to share better models with the SP community. Thx! (Subtext the recent Jundroo SP upgrade about 24 hours ago deleted all my Amazon components for SP.)

  • Su-34 Fullback 9.9 years ago

    Beautiful!

  • Merchessmit BF 109 9.9 years ago

    Well-mannered and a gorgeous plane!

  • Alert Five 9.9 years ago

    Thank you @Layne This is,of course, the Hollywood top gun model. Glad that you found it funny/amusing!

  • Spaceship "Raptor" III (BSG) 9.9 years ago

    Thank you, @Layne

  • Basic Trainer Cessna 310 9.9 years ago

    Thank you, @Nickasaurus

  • Basic Trainer Cessna 310 9.9 years ago

    Thank you, @Planefun

  • Fast Challenge 9.9 years ago

    I'll give you a prop plane that reaches 700+ mph at 80,000+ feet. ALL STOCK. Just for fun, no other reason.

  • Water 2 9.9 years ago

    Advise stock engines on Water on SP. Retest with stock engines, test, you decide.

  • Contender 9.9 years ago

    @karlosdarkness But, I took your plane from Tarpley to East Island runway, tricky but possible approach, touchdown on runway.

  • Contender 9.9 years ago

    @karlosdarkness Yes, and it was fun!

  • Contender 9.9 years ago

    Amazing stuff! Could land it and takeoff again on another island (East Island).

  • Water 9.9 years ago

    Luv the sleek water style! Hint: I had to change the rudder to "roll" vs "yaw" and invert=no to test it on my mobile. Then it works fine.

  • Basic Trainer Cessna 310 9.9 years ago

    Thank you, @Ctracerx2

  • Small Stunt Jet 9.9 years ago

    Thank you, @TheLatentImage

  • Basic Trainer Cessna 310 9.9 years ago

    Thank you! @dsr1aviation

  • Basic Trainer Cessna 310 9.9 years ago

    Thank you! @TheLatentImage

  • Basic Trainer Cessna 310 9.9 years ago

    Thanks, and it's there for the fun of other SP users! I found the original Twin kinda boring... @Delphinus

  • No. 1 Punk Fighter 7,000 mph 9.9 years ago

    Yeah, cause I gave it enough weight to "sit" on the runway. In-air. the wings are only for control. Air is like water to some of my SP posts. It does defy physics.@BattleBulge

  • Basic Trainer Cessna 310 9.9 years ago

    Thank you for testing and upvoting @Cjredwards

  • No. 1 Punk Fighter 7,000 mph 9.9 years ago

    Thank you @AlphaOneIndustries

  • No. 1 Punk Fighter 7,000 mph 9.9 years ago

    @BattleBulge Amen. I have an unposted model, same Steampunk aircraft, that reaches 20,000 mph as it overflys the other island, then blows up mid-air, and I decided to not to post that version.

  • The Prodigy (Steampunk Airship) 9.9 years ago

    Fantastic construction!

  • Great goose: water speeder 9.9 years ago

    You're approach to small single-engine is similar to the one I posted, yours w/o gear, similar speeds (engine limit). I like it!

  • No. 1 Punk Fighter 7,000 mph 9.9 years ago

    Thank you! @BattleBulge

  • No. 1 Punk Fighter 7,000 mph 9.9 years ago

    Thank you! @okilus

  • No. 1 Punk Fighter 7,000 mph 9.9 years ago

    @Delphinus Opinion, this model is just as factual as the LRSB. Google LRSB.(Tounge in cheek kidding).

  • Steam Punk Dreadnaught Argo 9.9 years ago

    Thank you! @Ctracerx2

  • Steam Punk Dreadnaught Argo 9.9 years ago

    Thank you! @PlanesAndThings

  • Small Stunt Jet 9.9 years ago

    Thank you, @AlphaOneIndustries

  • Small Stunt Jet 9.9 years ago

    Thank you @Nickasaurus

  • Small Stunt Jet 9.9 years ago

    @Planetinker You did good homework. Thx.

  • No. 1 Punk Fighter 7,000 mph 9.9 years ago

    @TheLatentImage Yes, but this post is the sub-20,000 mph version. At least it's stable, with room for improvement. My beta unlisted version exceeds 20,000 MPH; then runs out of fuel, so it's still WIP for "faster". Thx for you comments!

  • Small Stunt Jet 9.9 years ago

    Thank you @Delphinus

  • Small Stunt Jet 9.9 years ago

    Thanks! I agree, it's close, I wanted a base design that would carve through the sim air, and maneuver, even with that tiny engine. @JacobHardy64

  • SRI 9.9 years ago

    Clean design!

  • Acheron Air Sea Master 9.9 years ago

    Oh, I posted a spare part that I couldn't see on my desktop editor? OK. Not worth a re-post though. Checkout my Steam Punk Dreadnaught Argo, an all-new build that is better than this one. @AeroEngineering