Thanks @TheLatentImage I've had this on file for a couple weeks, at first it was a disaster in the air. Required weight on the bottom (VTOL engines for ballast) to finally work.
Thanks! @planesnthings - The USAF version with missiles also posted - called USAF 0-2A Duck. Both craft are the easiest things I've tried landing on SP - glide in at 99 mph to simple landings anywhere there land.
@mattmck Thx for rating, this had maybe test weapons in Vietnam as an USAF O-2 rescue plane, don't know too much about that. They had great long-range endurance, were used for military observation.
Bad habit, was up to 3 AM my time. At midnight I'd built 3 working versions of the Skymaster that did not please me in some way, so I re-built it from scratch, posted it then. Need to stop doing that... @TheLatentImage
Thx @Dynimerous yes had to be due to the excessive Walrus heavy nosecone, regular did not work, They are the most-minor mods possible (ultra-mods tried, also, and this thing crashes ASAP).
Thx @TheLatentImage Yes one set of nozzles is entirely inverted, for rotation canceling with the rear. Just one nozzle - I'll go look again, I posted this fairly late.
Thanks for the compliment @Wormforce
Thanks! @VonRichthofen
Thanks @TheLatentImage I've had this on file for a couple weeks, at first it was a disaster in the air. Required weight on the bottom (VTOL engines for ballast) to finally work.
Thank you @planesnthings This is one model no one else had posted yet, a classic with an impossible nose per SP building blocks.
Good collection, complex to do I know - the large panels on rotors look great!
Thank you @planesofold
Glad you liked and thanks @TheLatentImage
Thanks! @JMicah4
Thanks @planesnthings Next one will be stable, this is more of a stunt model.
Haven't tried that one yet, but will! @TheLatentImage
Yes, not perfect, but performs well if carefully flown @kyle123
Thanks for the rotors and comments! @WalrusAircraft
Note: @WalrusAircraft The blades do work. Thanks for creating them!
Thanks for the testing & rating @AlphaOneIndustries.
Thank you, @planesnthings
Thank you, @TheLatentImage
Thanks! @planesnthings - The USAF version with missiles also posted - called USAF 0-2A Duck. Both craft are the easiest things I've tried landing on SP - glide in at 99 mph to simple landings anywhere there land.
Thank you, these are great!
Excellent! The tri-wing controls on those Vipers is always tricky, you did it!
OK- Hey I just posted Flare Rockets on an USAF O-2A FAC Skymaster. Per one user's request.
Thanks @TheLatentImage
Thanks @JacobHardy64
@mattmck Thx for rating, this had maybe test weapons in Vietnam as an USAF O-2 rescue plane, don't know too much about that. They had great long-range endurance, were used for military observation.
@Jacobhardy64 - Fixed version- See: Cessna 337 Skymaster (fixed)
Fixed version- See: Cessna 337 Skymaster (fixed) @PlanesOfOld
OK - First I re-loaded a fixed Spymaster that does do much, much better! See: Cessna 337 Skymaster (fixed) @TheLatentImage
Bad habit, was up to 3 AM my time. At midnight I'd built 3 working versions of the Skymaster that did not please me in some way, so I re-built it from scratch, posted it then. Need to stop doing that... @TheLatentImage
Thx @Dynimerous yes had to be due to the excessive Walrus heavy nosecone, regular did not work, They are the most-minor mods possible (ultra-mods tried, also, and this thing crashes ASAP).
Thank you @Jacobhardy64
Thx @TheLatentImage Yes one set of nozzles is entirely inverted, for rotation canceling with the rear. Just one nozzle - I'll go look again, I posted this fairly late.
Tried them on version 1, need to double plane size: wing/cockpit/tail-boom to accommodate it, might do a larger build someday @PlanesOfOld
You must be a good model pilot! @TheLatentImage
Hey, thanks buddy @TheLatentImage
Thank you @TheLatentImage
Thx @TheLatentImage This is non-modded parts. For a modded stunt plane checkout : Ghost
Congrats!
Thank you @jacobhardy64 This is a wild one....
Thx @kevpilot
Thanks @Jshay
Pretty cool.
Yeah the thrust+artificial weight (anti-gravity) confuses SP software. Sorta did it on purpose. @GoneWest
This is so Rohan gets points. @GoneWest
For Future of Flight with @Rohan cockpit.
Thanks @gonewest Yes, if treated like a fighter this will spin out, gotta treat it like a passenger carrier, then its fairly normal in the air.
@Rohan you mean attach you cockpit?
Thank you! @jacobhardy64
@Rohan Here's a future idea of mine, for your Future of Flight Challenge.
@Rohan Yes already got a new design ready. All new, about to post "Futuristic Transport" aircraft.
@Intencer Well, I could build "stable" or "tricky to fly" and went with stable. The "trick" planes I've posted gather mostly complaints.
Thanks @Intencer and be sure to flight test!