See you reset pitch & upthrusted the engines, excellent! Somewhere in the intro, recommend a shout-out to the amazing cockpit view provided by @Skua Possible the best cockpit view on SP.
@Delphinus I have not read test rules. My propeller builds ace the Oceanview course, but miss a few silly "circle" markers. Same as other entrants. I could put a Cesnna 172 through all "circles" but, big deal, no contest. Will look into any new challenges, though.
@Delphinus Thx the Skycup Trials sound interesting. In the past, I've had my own personal approval issues with the SP "fly through the circle loop" digital semi-tests. Real pilot's testing is just not that simple. (Hey, I'm doing this for free, and fun, but validate Jundroo's phony testing? Likely not.)
Crazy fun! @Jacobhardy64 and @Nickasaurus. If you allowed, I could modifying the chassis, propulsion, and weapons...to bring major destruction to Murphy buildings, towers and bridges. Eventually I'll do an armored car, soon, anyway. Would be glad to share resulting points with you folks.
@JolanXBL Yeah, I could re-build a cargo sea ship or AN-225 for this, will think about that kind of entry. I'm not planning to dump a pile of red blocks somewhere, sit a tiny Cessna 150 on top. Do cargo blocks only need to move 3 feet, a full runway length, or between islands, @RocketLL
@flyingsteve88 Thx for reply - helps all of us. Re-tested my X-17 post: there are two clipped BFE engines in the thruster, and ACT=1 fires both off. Engine credit: @Nickasaurus
VTOL advertised as 20x for those highly effective torpedoes. Embedded VTOLs, low center mid-body are same. (I did not mod them, but when an XML modifier posted them, "check these out" I sure did so.)
Show some respect, dude, I just added computer-aided flight control. Or those fancy Lockheed AC would just crash. If a Lockheed AC ever pancaked on a desert floor, I see nothing, know nothing, no comment. @Delphinus
Since payloads can/will be mirrored infinite times (Windows only). the resulting 5 million lb air vehicle will look very "pretty" sitting on a ramp. and maybe get a few "up votes." As a cell-phone user, I cannot participate in this kind of "rigged" game. Good luck RockekLL.
Thank you! The upgrades were needed for the new Steam/SP flight physics. And, still, this puppy should go twice the speed. Wonder why, Jundroo? @flyingsteve88
You've almost described in detail 10 of my postings. I'll think about this proposal. If I can come up with something new that helps you and the general SP community, if...., I will submit something.
Up vote since it is mobile friendly. A large base design, I am going to post a tweaked modification where all the weapons work, using a very old Kindle.
@TheLatentImage Great, give thx to Skua!
Thanks, @Nickasaurus
Gotta sit in the cockpit for this one, @TheLatentImage
See you reset pitch & upthrusted the engines, excellent! Somewhere in the intro, recommend a shout-out to the amazing cockpit view provided by @Skua Possible the best cockpit view on SP.
Thank you, @TheLatentImage
@Delphinus Maybe. Maybe your mods are better.
@Delphinus Would luv to see you enter a Piper Cub.......haha, you could fly through every single SP "circle."
@Delphinus I have not read test rules. My propeller builds ace the Oceanview course, but miss a few silly "circle" markers. Same as other entrants. I could put a Cesnna 172 through all "circles" but, big deal, no contest. Will look into any new challenges, though.
Alien spider even has it's own radar; thanks for introducing a new level of creepiness into SP!
Stable, quick, fun!
@Delphinus Kidding me?
@Delphinus Thx the Skycup Trials sound interesting. In the past, I've had my own personal approval issues with the SP "fly through the circle loop" digital semi-tests. Real pilot's testing is just not that simple. (Hey, I'm doing this for free, and fun, but validate Jundroo's phony testing? Likely not.)
@Delphinus Yeah, but this one was intentionally about only 1,000 mph. Intended to launch mach 10 Vehicles.
OK, well maverikvii named it... @FrogmasterAereonautics
Already posted for @Skua as well @Nickasaurus
Uploading now. Multiple problems, have Skua test as well. @Nickasaurus
@Nickasaurus OK.
Update: this is a @Delphinus chassis. He's already posted a public chassis. @Nickasaurus how's your Heavy L-1000 coming?
Crazy fun! @Jacobhardy64 and @Nickasaurus. If you allowed, I could modifying the chassis, propulsion, and weapons...to bring major destruction to Murphy buildings, towers and bridges. Eventually I'll do an armored car, soon, anyway. Would be glad to share resulting points with you folks.
@Skua THx! That's the idea, easy, safe commuting!
@Kelemenaerospace Thank you!
@Hyperion6 Np.
Thank you, @SteadfastContracting
No, not any I-2000 that I could find. I'll post a Lockheed tav, if time allows, with your cockpit. @Nickasaurus
Thx for sharing with the community! Maybe will never use these shapes, but if I do it will be on OSX.
Congrats, you've captured the imperfect yet pretty VTOL version quite well!
Thank you, @Nickasaurus
Thank you, @flyingsteve88
@Delphinus see above comment, intended for you.
@Nickasaurus pls send a link, unsure which build you mean.
@JolanXBL Yeah, I could re-build a cargo sea ship or AN-225 for this, will think about that kind of entry. I'm not planning to dump a pile of red blocks somewhere, sit a tiny Cessna 150 on top. Do cargo blocks only need to move 3 feet, a full runway length, or between islands, @RocketLL
@Nxcaliburn Thx!
I like the idea & the shape of the model. Flight control (?) TBD.
@flyingsteve88 Thx for reply - helps all of us. Re-tested my X-17 post: there are two clipped BFE engines in the thruster, and ACT=1 fires both off. Engine credit: @Nickasaurus
Sweet commuter! Like a Learjet, the passengers had better buckle their seatbelts.
VTOL advertised as 20x for those highly effective torpedoes. Embedded VTOLs, low center mid-body are same. (I did not mod them, but when an XML modifier posted them, "check these out" I sure did so.)
@Delphinus Np.
Great missile fighter!
Show some respect, dude, I just added computer-aided flight control. Or those fancy Lockheed AC would just crash. If a Lockheed AC ever pancaked on a desert floor, I see nothing, know nothing, no comment. @Delphinus
OK. I've posted worse handling models. Another one is due in 15 minutes! @Nickasaurus
Naw, Jundroo disabled the added clipped thrust. But, with these small wings, it does not need much more power... @flyingsteve88
Since payloads can/will be mirrored infinite times (Windows only). the resulting 5 million lb air vehicle will look very "pretty" sitting on a ramp. and maybe get a few "up votes." As a cell-phone user, I cannot participate in this kind of "rigged" game. Good luck RockekLL.
Thank you! The upgrades were needed for the new Steam/SP flight physics. And, still, this puppy should go twice the speed. Wonder why, Jundroo? @flyingsteve88
You've almost described in detail 10 of my postings. I'll think about this proposal. If I can come up with something new that helps you and the general SP community, if...., I will submit something.
Thanks, @Noman0rumeral
Thanks, @JacobHardy64
Thanks @AlphaOneIndustries
Thank you, @Hyperion6 built a monster, I just added weapons. @Nickasaurus
Up vote since it is mobile friendly. A large base design, I am going to post a tweaked modification where all the weapons work, using a very old Kindle.
Somebody (I plead guilty) added a working torpedo and sunk the USS Tiny with this. And did not post it. Simple Plane, well done.