Yeah, these are SP wings or it wouldn't fly, the rear should shaped like the round part on a piece of pie. I could do that someday. The exhust pattern was what I was going for+altitude. @Aerobako
Thx. I tested a single-prop version, OK but not as fast. 2-props, only, was way two slow. Tri-prop version was highly experimental. I need to tweak the boom rudder and fuel amounts for easier landings (yes I can land it at 125 mph glide approach), but any variation of this design seems to top out between 720-725 mph level around 20,000 feet. @Himynameiswalrus
A new build. Potentially for the 700 mph stock engines prop plane challenge. This version of a new build is faster, but I'll also post an alternative build, which handles better. 100% stock everything.
Just a general observation folks, "clipped" engines have already been entered on planes for the 700 MPH challenge. Technical, these are not modded parts. These should be allowed, I think.
Unplanned schedule on that one; ideally CT can dig a "build" off his dad's desktop, and re-post. Doubt I could top his build. He sent some of us a link that did not work; needed to do an entire re-post. @Nickasaurus
Thank you, @Delphinus -- this desktop monster's performance actually exceeded my expectations, so I shared it. But, I prefer to remain mobile-friendly with other posts.
Thx, yes I did Independence Day "1400+ parts" ship also on a kindle. Here, those four outer HUGE engines were posted for public use, with the challenge that no one could really use them. Challenge accepted, accomplished. @bjac0
Yeah, these are SP wings or it wouldn't fly, the rear should shaped like the round part on a piece of pie. I could do that someday. The exhust pattern was what I was going for+altitude. @Aerobako
Thanks! @Nickasaurus
Thanks! @bskngshrk @Nickasaurus
Thank you, @Noman0rumeral
Thx. I tested a single-prop version, OK but not as fast. 2-props, only, was way two slow. Tri-prop version was highly experimental. I need to tweak the boom rudder and fuel amounts for easier landings (yes I can land it at 125 mph glide approach), but any variation of this design seems to top out between 720-725 mph level around 20,000 feet. @Himynameiswalrus
Thank you, @Oni789
Unfamiliar with that design. Dunno what star citizen is. @Oni789
Thanks, @Oni789
Thanks, @Delphinus
Thanks, @dsr1aviation
Well, highly re-designed with a similar paint scheme! Thanks, @Himynameiswalrus
Creative, I like it!
Thank you, @Noman0rumeral Check out my new tri-prop Carebear, I think its better all -around.
Thank you, @Oni789
A new build. Potentially for the 700 mph stock engines prop plane challenge. This version of a new build is faster, but I'll also post an alternative build, which handles better. 100% stock everything.
Just a general observation folks, "clipped" engines have already been entered on planes for the 700 MPH challenge. Technical, these are not modded parts. These should be allowed, I think.
Good hypno design!
@flyingsteve88 Thanks! A fictional Steampunk beast I dreamed up.
Thank you, @SteadfastContracting
Thanks, @Delphinus
Very similar flight to the original one.
Thanks, @Nickasaurus
Thanks @SteadfastContracting
@Customcargarage thx!
Thanks, @SUPERSAMROCK, @amazingperson124, @Meawk
Great detail, easy weapons release!
Interesting update. Flys high.
Thanks, @Nickasaurus
Good! Thx for info. @Nickasaurus
Unplanned schedule on that one; ideally CT can dig a "build" off his dad's desktop, and re-post. Doubt I could top his build. He sent some of us a link that did not work; needed to do an entire re-post. @Nickasaurus
Nice variable leading-wing build.
Thank you, @SteadfastContracting
@Nickasaurus Simple parts, good result. Nice in-body front intakes,
Thanks, @Steadfastcontracting
Thanks, @Steadfastcontracting
Thanks, @Steadfastcontracting
Thank you, @Nickasaurus
Thx! Yes the fiction is classic. The steam plane is just an idea of mine. @Astron1
Yeah, couldn't resist -- someone posted those ridiculous outer engines, saying no one could apply them. @Nickasaurus
Thanks, @Skua A simple radix error -- 40 million feet is much closer to 7,500 miles (not 7).
Thanks, @Nickasaurus
It was a very old movie, electricity was "magic." @Delphinus
Thx, @Delphinus I'm a fan of old movies. Nemo did all with steam and "magic" electricity.
Thankss, @frankensteinmoneymac This simple model has the largest prop-type engines I have come across on SP. For future reference.
At least you could download. My kindle would not download an item I built on the kindle. @Delphinus
Thank you, @Delphinus -- this desktop monster's performance actually exceeded my expectations, so I shared it. But, I prefer to remain mobile-friendly with other posts.
Thx, yes I did Independence Day "1400+ parts" ship also on a kindle. Here, those four outer HUGE engines were posted for public use, with the challenge that no one could really use them. Challenge accepted, accomplished. @bjac0
Thanks! My Kindle android crashed a few times when I built this one. Had to post via a faster desktop. @TehDuck
Thanks, @Delphinus
@Nickasaurus Np, since engines had enough boost. I used same delta wing on v3 and v4, the wings had to be appropriate to that 1960s design.