@Johawks1976 Subtle message to A. Garrison and others. When I can no longer use iOS for plane builds, I'll just build silly pots and pans and maybe flags on SP in my spare time. Thx for the vote.
@Thelaw11 SP moderators advised me to keep my prior models posted (rather than deleted). I hope that you can copy/apply anything you find to future builds. With my permission.
@Flash0of0green Thx, good question. Does NOT fly like a Piper Cub. Does exceed standard SR71 cruise speed. Missiles are symbolic, above 2,000 mph Sunray out-flies the missiles.
Propeller aircraft that can glide to landing: Semi-symmetrical or flat. Jet models are different. Jet AC use a combination of semi, flat, and symmetrical wings in the real world. Somehow, SP got lucky and yes, you can use any sim wing you choose and create a SIM SP model that both flies fast and also lands.
Even if it ain't really practical, this "graphics cockpit" is a great step forward for Jundroo SP models. Hope you allow others to integrate it. (Not me I mean others.) iPhone dinosaur users (me), well, impractical. Tested on my OSX, as a test baseline. If mobiles are ignored by Jundroo, then Jundoo's fate is sealed.
2nd note: mainly you got my vote for adding the pitot tube (which was one of many Northrop shortfalls in design). The handling is decent within the SW sim boundaries provided by Jundroo SP. Sim speed is close to the real "clearance area" article tested. By accident, I suppose...... good job!
@TheLatentImage @WhiteWing upon testing it appears that @SpritusRaptor found the same engine that I sometimes use on my builds https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/sblk42/HAWKE-Tournament-vEXP
SP has some messed-up things going on with the latest SP updates for iOS devices, for example, they no longer seem to allow the creation of new subassemblies, and the "Load Aircraft" selection brings up a blank black screen. I've already messaged AndrewGarrison on the second issue. Just a head's up. @TheLatentImage
@Johawks1976 Subtle message to A. Garrison and others. When I can no longer use iOS for plane builds, I'll just build silly pots and pans and maybe flags on SP in my spare time. Thx for the vote.
Thanks @AlphaOneIndustries
Thanks @SUPERSAMROCK
Thanks @Nickasaurus
Thanks @Steadfastcontracting
Thanks @flyingsteve88
Recommend vtol control to top bar, use normal (short) runway takeoff. Creative and good build!
An experiment from old V1.0 SP Blocks (which have stronger SW glue than the newer SW blocks) Thanks, @Delphinus
Thanks @Nickasaurus
@Thelaw11 SP moderators advised me to keep my prior models posted (rather than deleted). I hope that you can copy/apply anything you find to future builds. With my permission.
Thanks, @Planefun
Thanks, @Steadfastcontracting
Thanks, @PlanesAndThings
Thanks @Himynameiswalrus
@Flash0of0green Thx, good question. Does NOT fly like a Piper Cub. Does exceed standard SR71 cruise speed. Missiles are symbolic, above 2,000 mph Sunray out-flies the missiles.
Thank you, @Thelaw11
Glad you enjoyed enjoied a sci-final classic, Thx @Thelaw11
Thank you @Thelaw11
@Nickasaurus Hi, but realize that real-world AC like the FA-18 and SR71 always landed via a controlled crash with extremely skilled pilots.
Propeller aircraft that can glide to landing: Semi-symmetrical or flat. Jet models are different. Jet AC use a combination of semi, flat, and symmetrical wings in the real world. Somehow, SP got lucky and yes, you can use any sim wing you choose and create a SIM SP model that both flies fast and also lands.
Thanks @Nickasaurus
Thanks @Steadfastcontracting
Thanks @bjac0
@Rohan More STOL, more! Keep building this incredible stuff.
Gotta admit vtol is tricky. This is a great build. Fun to fly!
Thank you, @Planesdude
Excellent replica!
Even if it ain't really practical, this "graphics cockpit" is a great step forward for Jundroo SP models. Hope you allow others to integrate it. (Not me I mean others.) iPhone dinosaur users (me), well, impractical. Tested on my OSX, as a test baseline. If mobiles are ignored by Jundroo, then Jundoo's fate is sealed.
Thx, it works well! @Rohan
@PlanesAndThings Thanks, yes it was not easy to make it SP operational, e.g. blow up bridges!
Amazing build; great cockpit, wings and a very nasty weapons delivery system!
Thanks @bskngshrk
Thanks @bskngshrk
Thanks @bskngshrk
Thanks @bskngshrk
Thanks @bskngshrk
Thanks @bskngshrk
Thanks @bskngshrk
Thanks @bskngshrk
Thanks @bskngshrk
Thanks @bskngshrk
@Stellarcrazyargonaut Thx for voting!
2nd note: mainly you got my vote for adding the pitot tube (which was one of many Northrop shortfalls in design). The handling is decent within the SW sim boundaries provided by Jundroo SP. Sim speed is close to the real "clearance area" article tested. By accident, I suppose...... good job!
Northrop, ugh. Design+build outstanding!
You even remembered to install the forward Optical+FLIR sensor. Great build!
@TheLatentImage @WhiteWing upon testing it appears that @SpritusRaptor found the same engine that I sometimes use on my builds https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/sblk42/HAWKE-Tournament-vEXP
SP has some messed-up things going on with the latest SP updates for iOS devices, for example, they no longer seem to allow the creation of new subassemblies, and the "Load Aircraft" selection brings up a blank black screen. I've already messaged AndrewGarrison on the second issue. Just a head's up. @TheLatentImage
Try the vtol thruster from the following link https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/9C2ogq/Hi-powered-Thruster-with-Built-in-Fuel
More power is possible for main nacelles, https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/9C2ogq/Hi-powered-Thruster-with-Built-in-Fuel
Nice first Vengance!
As you know, that vtol embedded engine, rotated, is quite an accomplishment. Thx for sharing!