Yes. The FFRDC I used to work full-time for consulted NASA during the Shuttle years; also commercial stuff like Iridium, and various Comsat launchers. I also sometimes worked at NORAD and Cape Canaveral, and Vandenberg. Now I'm semi-retired, part-time. Still interested in aircraft designs; former Burbank Lockheed employee. @WalrusAircraft
@Nickasaurus @Himynameiswalrus @WalrusAircraft I'm definitely over 40, have not developed software (professionally) for over 15 years, USA - favorite hobby is driving my Camaro SS on S. Californian desert roads; occasionally tinker with SP. Trained in building & operations of international satellite vehicles. Part-time employed by a major corporation that must remain nameless. So, you'll continue to see various spacecraft in my posts.
No, the downward wingtips, where the wheels are mounted. If they were level or canted up, the aircraft model would be easier to handle. Still handles OK. @pitot
Hi! Thx for finding this build, the wings are mounted in a way that is new. This is an experiment, using old SP panels & new propulsion+missiles. @gregorjakob
The older mothership+shuttles got 2 0r 3 upvotes. I probably deleted most of them, no big deal. Until you try to build a mothership+shuttle using these rudimentary SP tools.) @Delphinus
Thx! (I've posted shuttlecraft landers, though, nobody on SP seems interested. I could easily add a shuttle to the mothership, but that was not the challange, here.) @Delphinus
Thank you! @KerlonceauxIndustries
Thanks @BobTheTitanSP This was a file xfer; there are some bugs in the trim for slower mobile platforms that I should have fixed
Thanks @Delphinus This was a file xfer; there are some bugs in the trim for slower mobile platforms that I should have fixed
Thanks @KerlonceauxIndustries This was a file xfer; there are some bugs in the trim for slower mobile platforms that I should have fixed.
Thank you, @flyingsteve88
Thank you, @KerlonceauxIndustries
Thank you, @Delphinus
Great looks! Flys, well, OK.
Thank you, @SteadfastContracting
Thank you, @Noman0rumeral
Thanks, this was an experiment that surprisingly worked! @Delphinus
Thx, you got it right -- could not believe this actually flew, had to post a test model... @MrMecha
Thanks @flyingsteve88
Thx! However I merely pushed SP physics to it's simple limits. For FTL, gotta leave the atmosphere. @PlanesAndThings
Thanks @PlanesAndThings
Yeah, thanks. This thing goes anywhere in the SP world, though, only.. Including Yeti runway and Prixus Gold flat strips. @exosuit
Yes. The FFRDC I used to work full-time for consulted NASA during the Shuttle years; also commercial stuff like Iridium, and various Comsat launchers. I also sometimes worked at NORAD and Cape Canaveral, and Vandenberg. Now I'm semi-retired, part-time. Still interested in aircraft designs; former Burbank Lockheed employee. @WalrusAircraft
Go ahead. I've already posted a faster version; it took wing updates in addition to engines. @FLOWRIDER0
@FLOWRIDER0 No, this slow model is a 100% stock parts competition.
@FLOWRIDER0 No, Warp means it breaks Jundroo physics.
@luciferxolotl1 actually @ThePlaneModifier copied this from my https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/5B4C11/Spaceship-Raza-Warp-Speed-Mk-I
@Nickasaurus @Himynameiswalrus @WalrusAircraft I'm definitely over 40, have not developed software (professionally) for over 15 years, USA - favorite hobby is driving my Camaro SS on S. Californian desert roads; occasionally tinker with SP. Trained in building & operations of international satellite vehicles. Part-time employed by a major corporation that must remain nameless. So, you'll continue to see various spacecraft in my posts.
Thank you, @SteadfastContracting
Thank you, @flyingsteve88
Thank you, @TheLatentImage
No, the downward wingtips, where the wheels are mounted. If they were level or canted up, the aircraft model would be easier to handle. Still handles OK. @pitot
The down dihedral makes flight tricky, yet this is a good build!
Thanks @Delphinus
Thanks @gregorjakob
@BobTheTitanSP Gotcha! Yet the comet Icarus remains somewhat strange.
Nicely done!
@gregorjakob I do not use Skype, no
Hi! Thx for finding this build, the wings are mounted in a way that is new. This is an experiment, using old SP panels & new propulsion+missiles. @gregorjakob
The older mothership+shuttles got 2 0r 3 upvotes. I probably deleted most of them, no big deal. Until you try to build a mothership+shuttle using these rudimentary SP tools.) @Delphinus
Thx! (I've posted shuttlecraft landers, though, nobody on SP seems interested. I could easily add a shuttle to the mothership, but that was not the challange, here.) @Delphinus
Nice simple design!
Gotta try your method, soon.
Thanks @flyingsteve88
Thanks @Flyingtacos
Thanks @Djbanana
Thx @RMark1
Thanks @Nickasaurus
Good mountain climber! Why use SP wheels when you can build your own......
Thanks @flyingsteve88
@Delphinus Thx for the comparative specs. When this tablet "dies in obsolescence" I'm thinking about something more like Nexus or similar.
@Stingray D**n autocorrect - 64 GB ( not BB).
Next the Terminator T-500 exoskeleton?
Very nice build!
Thanks for voting; did you test it on the various competion ranges mentioned ( built for stock performance not looks) /
2.2 Quad-core Snapdragon 800 CPU, Adreno 330 GPU. 2 GB RAM. 64 BB flash-drive memory. @Delphinus