I don't know what you mean exactly, but I can just give u some info about the physics system. The main difference lies in the amount of iterations the physics solver performs per frame. For low I think it was 15, medium 20 and high 25. The higher the solver iteration count, the "stiffer" the joints are.
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it know where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is, whichever is greater, it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't and, arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation; the variation being the difference between where the missile is and where it isn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it, too, may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows: because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is, however it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice versa. And by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
@MajorSix Do you have any idea about the amount of panels he's going to need to tediously nudge into position without breaking anything. The riveting and wiring the controls is hard too but at least it's a somewhat localized task.
Holy hell, you are absolutely right. Makes me wonder how many upvotes he would get if he cranked out a super build. He is on mobile though so he probably can't do much about it. Well, except for getting a pc and building the proper way hahaha.
This looks really, really good
With bone
You did a damn good job on that paint job
I don't know what you mean exactly, but I can just give u some info about the physics system. The main difference lies in the amount of iterations the physics solver performs per frame. For low I think it was 15, medium 20 and high 25. The higher the solver iteration count, the "stiffer" the joints are.
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it know where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is, whichever is greater, it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't and, arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation; the variation being the difference between where the missile is and where it isn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it, too, may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows: because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is, however it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice versa. And by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
+7Never add parts, add power.
@Gluck Borkpower
@Hellosss38 Horsepower Horsepower.
Horsepower
@Sunkray Horsepower
@Hellosss38 Horsepower
@banbantheman lad
@JeskoGoesVROOM Big horsepower
+1@Aldriech Predictable.
@Aldriech Horsepower is horsepower
@Hellosss38 Horsepower
Not enough horsepower
+2@hpgbproductions Good wattage. Horsepower
myes
@Aldriech @AWESOMENESS360 Horsepower
@KettleKip Be gone. Horsepower
@Sm10684 Horsepower
nice plen
Thats a lot of horsepower
+1How much horsepower
How much horsepower
Horsepower
Horsepower
@banbantheman Horsepower
+2Horsepower
@MajorSix Do you have any idea about the amount of panels he's going to need to tediously nudge into position without breaking anything. The riveting and wiring the controls is hard too but at least it's a somewhat localized task.
Good luck panelling, see you in 5000 years when it's done!
+5Your free trial of having an airplane has expired
+3Wholesome
@theUSSR bottom gear
+1@Spacedoge12345plane I remember those times. Makes me wonder what could have caused such a shift.
+1Really nice, drawing planes used to be my life lol.
I am fully backing this
+10The one below sea level
Why would u do dis
haha forums go brrr
+2T
@Highground our names rhyme
@ThePropellerIsAFan i am not a fan of drama
Holy hell, you are absolutely right. Makes me wonder how many upvotes he would get if he cranked out a super build. He is on mobile though so he probably can't do much about it. Well, except for getting a pc and building the proper way hahaha.
+2When do these sorts of thing happen? I wanna join in
A simple search wouldve done the job
+2I-it looks like an RV-8
+1From down below, an enemy spotted
+2@XP Lad