25.5k Souplane Comments

  • BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) 1.6 years ago

    very epic

  • Amusement Ride Challenge [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    rewards may take a while due to upvote cooldown

  • Amusement Ride Challenge [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    good job

  • Amusement Ride Challenge [CLOSED] 1.7 years ago

    1st place: @ChamDel78
    2nd place: @ThatDr42

  • gremen see-wun traitor 1.7 years ago

    I just realized that I named the build as something not very family friendly and I cannot update XML because android is being weird

  • Spoil your builds Challenge 1.7 years ago

    Can I submit multiple entries? I have too much builds that can be completely pooped on

  • Aerofirm F/A-34 1.7 years ago

    Ok I understand now

  • Aerofirm F/A-34 1.7 years ago

    @FairFireFlight Hold on. can you rephrase that? I'm not understanding

  • North Pacific Aviation - F-34-37A-TX "Mikan" 1.7 years ago

    aerodynamics travesty

  • AH-1G Paimon 1.7 years ago

    Looks yummy 😋

    +2
  • yeet bois 69420 website flaw something something 1.7 years ago

    Funny thing about internet points...

    I've heard all pro and cons opinions about the SP upvotes. Some people (including me) consider them as a display of appreciation for a good build, others a morale boost (especially for beginners, for me was nice when I was a silver and a respected veteran like Thealban upvoted me ), others a display of status (gold or platinum player demand more respect... right). Others consider those points worthless, not real etc...

    I respect all opinions. Personally, upvotes on this community means less and less lately. It was exciting for me at first. Probably cause I love RPG games when you gain XP and levels...Now, I have 12 finished projects, well, finished like 95%, cannot find motivation to go the last 5% and upload them.

    Points are easy to make. Post the same build 3-4 times, with different colors. Host a challenge. Post silly things, your friends will automatically upvote because social obligations.

    Now the funny thing 🤣
    Did a little detective work (slow boring Sunday) on people claiming upvotes are nothing 🙂 Guess what I found?

    So, if those points mean N0thing to you, why do you have platinum rank as a GOAL in your bio?

    Why do you have "anniversary" posts like "50k". Forums or airplane post.
    Why do you upvote those posts and congratulate the owners?

    Whatever
    The smart thing to do is to stop blaming people for having different views and opinions. Let them love or hate points. That includes me, calling a member of my primate clan a point farmer for posting different liveries of the same aircraft.

    +1
  • C723 Starship 1.7 years ago

    I really love the looks of this but i do think its a bit small for a regional airliner

    +1
  • Bug thread for v1.12.128 (current version) 1.7 years ago

    The VR clipboard/map can collide with objects. I noticed this when I clipped the clipboard into a seat attached to a detacher and it moved, and eventually exploded when I fiddled with it enough (Using this craft, should be easily replicated). This bug may have also caused my plane to explode but I'm not too sure about that.

  • [PC click old] Buffalo airways DC-3 1.7 years ago

    Hello, nice plane but the yoke acts really weird? I VR tested it and when I roll the joystick base moves left. Also the trim, landing gear and VTOL levers are a bit far

    +6
  • Lightning Aircraft Industries Falcon FR Mk.IB 1.7 years ago

    @FeatherWing About the turret, since it automatically returns to its neutral position it's essentially impossible to aim for keyboard users
    EDIT: I was not thinking about mouse controls

    +1
  • Lightning Aircraft Industries Falcon FR Mk.IB 1.7 years ago

    @FeatherWing Idk why I couldnt find it lmao

  • Lightning Aircraft Industries Falcon FR Mk.IB 1.7 years ago

    As much as I love this build, there are a few problems:
    1. Turret movement isn't the greatest, I feel that it could have been better with something like sum((-Roll)-(Roll))
    2. No trim, trim would be useful if the turret is in use

  • Passenger Conversion Challenge 1.7 years ago

    This is a pretty cool challenge, but maybe extend the deadline to something like the 20th? I feel that would make this challenge more assessable to more people but idk lol

  • Grumman C-1 Trader 1.7 years ago

    @RobloxMan It's superior anyways lol

  • Vane Anemometer 1.7 years ago

    @NatsukiHoshino Those points are confusing, I think you mean headwind component and crosswind component relative to a set heading

  • Scrambler 1.8 years ago

    @DatRoadTrainGuy19 control yourself

    +1
  • Car Sim 1.8 years ago

    amazing

  • F35B Lightning II (V2) 1.8 years ago

    Very nice! It looks detailed but simple

    +1
  • PR-4 "Hole Puncher" 1.8 years ago

    This is pretty cool but where is the ammo stored?
    Edit: Theres only 10 shells that makes sense

    +3
  • H.A.R.V cockpit update 1.8 years ago

    This is cool. I've actually seen the harv irl it's pretty cool

    +1
  • How Europeans See the US 1.8 years ago

    @Dathcha I can confirm that is true

  • Union Pacific GE Evolution 1.8 years ago

    May I take the wheel assembly of this to use for my own locomotive? I'm not smart enough to do it myself :P

  • highwaystar 1.8 years ago

    build by @realSavageMan find the build here

  • Grumman C-1 Trader 1.8 years ago

    If the propeller explodes and/or doesn't produce thrust, please download the Non-Vr Version: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/knwC4F/Grumman-C-1-NON-VR

  • Grumman C-1 Trader 1.8 years ago

    @OPwindu Download the Non-Vr version linked in the description

    +1
  • Grumman C-1 Trader 1.8 years ago

    @alexJgameYTukraine The original plane was probably like this as the main landing gear on the real thing is very far forward

    +2
  • bowlus gowlus 1.8 years ago

    @Maximan You sure can lol, remember to add the wing braces that I forgot to add. Although I am planning to improve this also.

  • bowlus gowlus 1.8 years ago

    @MitchellAviation you got it!

  • I OWN Simpleplanes! 1.8 years ago

    ok

    +1
  • Engine 1.8 years ago

    @Reworkable yes

  • Engine 1.8 years ago

    what if i jump in

  • ShartCart 1.8 years ago

    @LockheedLover Happy birthday hope you enjoy this

  • Grumman C-1 Trader 1.8 years ago

    @Keth I may but it seems a bit beyond my building capabilities

    +1
  • ShartCart 1.8 years ago

    @InsertNameHere01

  • Percy 1.8 years ago

    @sausage978 Pitch

  • Grumman C-1 Trader 1.8 years ago

    @Vincent Can you make this build a successor to Walvis' Airlift Challenge? Thank you in advance.

    +1
  • F-8J Crusader 1.8 years ago

    Nice build but no variable incidence wing >>>>>:((((((

    +2
  • -1×Please Don't Upvote & Download 1.9 years ago

    @MrCOPTY This is Vectors plane on drugs

    +2
  • chicken 1.9 years ago

    May I use the walking code for one of my builds?

  • It's Coming 1.9 years ago

    @MitchellAviation yes

  • R-2 Coastal Reconaissance Plane 2.0 years ago

    This is very cool, but why are the control surfaces so small lol

  • SchArCo Trident 2.0 years ago

    This is nice, but I feel like this would get shot down instantly if you tried to sink a ship.
    Edit: I have tested this and I do get shot down in a few seconds

  • Eco Challenge [CLOSED] 2.0 years ago

    Any idea when the results will come out?