These ratings are for a slightly modified version, where the right canard is angled up 5 degrees to compensate for the roll.
Design: 8/10
Turn rate: 3/10
Top speed: 13/15
Climb rate: 15/15
Overall rating: 9/15
The turn rate is dragging you down a bit- everything but design was averaged between the original and the modified-canard one- but overall, very good submission!
@Enthusiastic1planes ...This is based on the first ME-262 prototype, which had a propeller engine. Even if it's disqualified, can you still rank it so i know what to improve on?
I made an 'improved' version of this... it probably wouldn't score much higher, but it's a pointer for improving off of this design, if you want to make another submission... you do get 2 more, after all...
@jamesPLANESii , i've gotten into something of a competing position with AeroTactical, so can you make a backstory for this for my company standpoint? It was going out of business till the YAF-173 was built, and then the company(me) made the KR-19.
@Unwanted wat
@Unwanted I can't, i'm on mobile lol
@thatrandomguywholikesSP
Wanna join?
@Unwanted then lemme know when theres another one >:P
@Unwanted lmk when you start one of these again, i'd like to join one
@Unwanted k
@Unwanted then do you want me to be a company on your side? i have a bomber currently in the making that i could retrofit
ayo, i might have to join in on this war
is there a spot available?
You have oil that is not under my possession. Hand it over now, or face war.
-America talking to Saudia Arabia
I'm back-
JESUS CHRIST HOW MANY OF YOU ARE THERE
After reading your description and researching what it's based on, i'm raising your score from 9/15 to 12/15. That was a pretty hard-to-find aircraft!
(cough cough, definitely didn't forget to read your description before rating the plane)
These ratings are for a slightly modified version, where the right canard is angled up 5 degrees to compensate for the roll.
Design: 8/10
Turn rate: 3/10
Top speed: 13/15
Climb rate: 15/15
Overall rating: 9/15
The turn rate is dragging you down a bit- everything but design was averaged between the original and the modified-canard one- but overall, very good submission!
Loving the asymmetry! Currently flying this, hold on for a rating.
@AmethystAircraft Oh jesus christ.
@Enthusiastic1planes ...This is based on the first ME-262 prototype, which had a propeller engine. Even if it's disqualified, can you still rank it so i know what to improve on?
Done! Hope you enjoy flying it!
Making a submission.
I made an 'improved' version of this... it probably wouldn't score much higher, but it's a pointer for improving off of this design, if you want to make another submission... you do get 2 more, after all...
That is a... very bad performance cost you have, there...
I can't even grade this normally.
13.5/15.
Fellow function over form builder! :D
@AeroTactical Thanks for the upvote! I've made a version with an all-moving tailplane, so let me know if i should post that as well.
Tasty- dies from eating lava
@Warthundertypegy1 @MiG15bis What?
Oh jesus christ.
@WzNick It's physically impossible to stress me out with this challenge. I have another one going at the same time.
Alright, thanks for the clarification @WzNick ! @Halcyon215 , that would be a fine thing to build!
@Warthundertypegy1 how did a literal 2nd generation jet comment on this post?! @MiG15bis ?!?!
@WzNick Thanks for the spotlight!
@Halcyon215 Sure!
Alright, that'll take a while but it's not impossible.
While testing this just now, i figured out it can kind of fly with all of the main wings on one side missing. Don't ask how i figured that out.
@jamesPLANESii , i've gotten into something of a competing position with AeroTactical, so can you make a backstory for this for my company standpoint? It was going out of business till the YAF-173 was built, and then the company(me) made the KR-19.
@jamesPLANESii Alright, thanks!
@SupremeSpeed25 You don't get into this, this is a 'competing companies only' argument.
I don't know what that is, @Halcyon215 . Go ahead.
@Enthusiastic1planes Rated it and spotlighted it.
I have one issue, it noses down very hard with the slightest turn in Supersonic mode. 8/10 though, pretty good!
@Warthundertypegy1 I agree with @USAMustang . This is absolute cinema- i'm sorry for the brainrot, but it's true.
@Enthusiastic1planes Now, is that sarcasm?
Design: 10/10
Top speed: 9/10
Turn rate: 14/15
Climb rate: 10/15
Final rating: 14/15
I'm not even joking, this thing might actually win the contest.
@Halcyon215 I'd love to see your take on this challenge!
@Halcyon215 You're not wrong. I assume he used a Boom 25 because it's lighter.
@AeroTactical Alright, i deserved that one.
@AeroTactical Just you wait and see.
@AeroTactical Soon, we will be competing fiercely...
@ThatrandomguywholikesSP Would you like to make an aircraft to compete with the KR-19 i just recently posted?
@AeroTactical A competing company emerges...
If this gets 5 upvotes, i will make an even more asymmetric aircraft.
@Halcyon215 Use this on the ice base. You will very rapidly see it's not.
The new one, @ThatrandomguywholikesSP , got a higher rating, so i'm taking that one for the contest.