If anyone isn’t satisfied with their points, you can redo the plane and submit it as a new aircraft, and I will mark it separately. Do note however that you can only make at most 3 planes.
@Gabriel747 I’ve searched Google, and there was no actual concept for a passenger B-52 produced by Boeing, if there was I would have seen blueprints, models or maybe even prototypes. As such, I can’t accept the plane.
Found&Explained doesn’t just make videos about “never-built” aircraft, it also makes videos on “what if this plane was a passenger plane?”, which are purely hypothetical questions and NOT videos on real-life concepts, if you get what I’m saying.The passenger B-52 is one of those videos.
However, a passenger version of the Lockheed C-5 Galaxy was proposed, called the L-5000, so if you want to make it feel free to do so
@Hiimakeplanes
- Originality: 7/10 (the P6M's listed as one of the example aircraft, and there are several other P6Ms on the site)
- Looks: 9/15 (this is quite accurate but it's small, also i know that since it's a block plane the details are very simplistic and minimal and it makes it look nice, but I judge based on realism and detail. Also the actual plane has landing gear, despite being a seaplane)
- Performance: 12/15 (quite decent performance, very manoeuvrable)
- Features: 5/5 (has weapon)
- Overall: 33/45 (nothing else to say)
@Vincentmenard
- Originality: 9/10 (i never heard of this plane before this post)
- Looks: 9/15 (looks ok, but the real plane's bigger, and the nose isn't supposed to be this pointy. Also the nose gear's painted white and the default cockpit sticks out)
- Performance: 11/15 (flies ok, but pitches up a lot at full thrust without trim)
- Features: 5/5 (the experimental plane has no features, so)
- Overall: 34/45 (good, just work on the accuracy bit)
@Rick09
- Originality: 9/10 (I never even heard of this plane until you posted it, good job!)
- Looks: 11/15 (looks nice at a first glance, quite accurate too, I really like the fact that it has a working cockpit. Just change the tail shape to make it more accurate, and make the cockpit look more 1940-ish.)
- Performance: 10/15 (flies quite well, only bad thing is that it's unstable, although the real plane's performance wasn't that good either)
- Features: 5/5 (it's suitable as a fighter, and has working guns too)
- Overall: 35/45 (good job!)
@HololiveFan2009 XML and Fine Tuner can be used on mobile as they’ve been preloaded into SimplePlanes, check the mods section in your game and you should see them there
More people are joining the challenge than I previously expected, so I’m making the prizes better (so that I can give back all the points I got from upvotes here)
The updated points list is above in the pinned comments
Weird stuff always gets the most upvotes, because they get attention or/and are funny
(for context look at my 2 most upvoted aircraft (the Turbo Lines RL-72, a turboprop flight simulator reference, and the Cessna 172X)
@Vandermone 那些就可以
@Vandermone 不算，它必须是一架打算生产的飞机
If anyone isn’t satisfied with their points, you can redo the plane and submit it as a new aircraft, and I will mark it separately. Do note however that you can only make at most 3 planes.
@Gabriel747 I’ve searched Google, and there was no actual concept for a passenger B-52 produced by Boeing, if there was I would have seen blueprints, models or maybe even prototypes. As such, I can’t accept the plane.
Found&Explained doesn’t just make videos about “never-built” aircraft, it also makes videos on “what if this plane was a passenger plane?”, which are purely hypothetical questions and NOT videos on real-life concepts, if you get what I’m saying.The passenger B-52 is one of those videos.
However, a passenger version of the Lockheed C-5 Galaxy was proposed, called the L-5000, so if you want to make it feel free to do so
Approved
ooh a tail-sitter
@Vincentmenard you can submit up to 3 aircraft, so if you make an updated version I’ll consider it as your 2nd aircraft
@Gabriel747 no, since a passenger B-52 was never a real concept
bonus: uh sir i hit a rock
@Hiimakeplanes
- Originality:
7/10(the P6M's listed as one of the example aircraft, and there are several other P6Ms on the site)- Looks:
9/15(this is quite accurate but it's small, also i know that since it's a block plane the details are very simplistic and minimal and it makes it look nice, but I judge based on realism and detail. Also the actual plane has landing gear, despite being a seaplane)- Performance:
12/15(quite decent performance, very manoeuvrable)- Features:
5/5(has weapon)- Overall:
33/45(nothing else to say)@Vincentmenard
- Originality:
9/10(i never heard of this plane before this post)- Looks:
9/15(looks ok, but the real plane's bigger, and the nose isn't supposed to be this pointy. Also the nose gear's painted white and the default cockpit sticks out)- Performance:
11/15(flies ok, but pitches up a lot at full thrust without trim)- Features:
5/5(the experimental plane has no features, so)- Overall:
34/45(good, just work on the accuracy bit)@AlivePan hello there
@Kingachuuu yes
Approved
Interesting plane
Approved
hmm a block plane
@qazedcujmyhn thx
Also can I use your engines for something I'm making? @qazedcujmyhn
@Rick09
- Originality:
9/10(I never even heard of this plane until you posted it, good job!)- Looks:
11/15(looks nice at a first glance, quite accurate too, I really like the fact that it has a working cockpit. Just change the tail shape to make it more accurate, and make the cockpit look more 1940-ish.)- Performance:
10/15(flies quite well, only bad thing is that it's unstable, although the real plane's performance wasn't that good either)- Features:
5/5(it's suitable as a fighter, and has working guns too)- Overall:
35/45(good job!)@CR929thenewSPplayer I’m at school, will do it when I get home
Accepted
but why does it look like a 767 (the real 7J7’s based off the 727)
@okand sorry what?
first comment...?
T... i guess?
Wait, did you literally get gold from just one plane
if you did that's really impressive 👍
@Emuoverlord sure, just remember to follow the rules
@CR929thenewSPplayer yes
also the abbreviation for “I don’t know” is IDK, not IDN
787
tutel
🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
@Legomaster0418 my bad
So yeah, I think the answer is clear now
@Rick09 besides your submission, there are already 3 other builds; go check the list of successors to this post
Approved
will judge it later
first plane (I mean car)
@ChronicMotors no, sorry
@AirJMC just attach the nose to a hinge rotator
@AirJMC oh the one with the swinging nose door
What does the 6-digit string of letters and numbers represent
2 hours, 41 upvotes
@Decembermin so who won the challenge?
This is now officially your most upvoted plane
@HololiveFan2009 is ok
@HololiveFan2009 ok i guess
@HololiveFan2009 oh wait no I said in the description that you can use XML and fine tuner, but other mods are banned
@HololiveFan2009 XML and Fine Tuner can be used on mobile as they’ve been preloaded into SimplePlanes, check the mods section in your game and you should see them there
More people are joining the challenge than I previously expected, so I’m making the prizes better (so that I can give back all the points I got from upvotes here)
The updated points list is above in the pinned comments
@1714 ohhhh
Weird stuff always gets the most upvotes, because they get attention or/and are funny
(for context look at my 2 most upvoted aircraft (the Turbo Lines RL-72, a turboprop flight simulator reference, and the Cessna 172X)
Just one more thing, if anyone’s thinking of building the Lockheed Flatbed, please try not to, as I have plans to build it
@HololiveFan2009 ah the T-4MS
@Hahahahaahahshs maximum of 3 is allowed (but try to have just 1)