51.5k RepublicOfCursedPlanes Comments

  • ATR-72 2.1 years ago

    Proportions are a bit off but sure

    +1
  • VC-220 2.1 years ago

    When your Osprey doesn't VTOL:

    +1
  • Tol 2.1 years ago

    Russian plne

    +1
  • Grumman F-75 Shark 2.1 years ago

    Just wondering, why don’t you post aircraft with custom thumbnails? I’ve seen that you’re able to do it, so I just want to know why you choose not to. @Bryan5

    +1
  • Some sketches of places in the RCP 2.1 years ago

    @WisconsinStatePolice thanks!

    +1
  • Essay Suggestions 2.1 years ago

    Another reason why the penny should be abolished is because it is made out of zinc coated with copper, instead of high-strength aluminium. This prevents the penny from being able to sustain supersonic flight due to the high temperatures experienced during this flight phase. Additionally, the penny has a lack of advanced weapons, especially the AIM-9X. It also uses traditional avionics and an fully-analog control system, with a rudimentary autopilot that only provides heading and speed controls and does not contain any flight envelope protections. Hence, the penny is extremely outdated compared to more superior fighter jets like the F-22 and F-35, and should be removed from service as soon as possible.

    +1
  • BOAC Wright W-2000 [VR-compatible] 2.1 years ago

    @teddyone02 precisely, idk why everyone has to make such a fuss about it. It's their own decision, so we should just leave them alone.

    +1
  • HMS-Malta (1939) 2.1 years ago

    @Hiimakeplanes just tag me on your unlisted posts. If I don't reply, it means that I'm busy and won't be able to take screenshots for that particular post.

    +1
  • HMS-Malta (1939) 2.1 years ago

    If you want, I can help you take better screenshots, though I may not be available daily @Hiimakeplanes

    +1
  • BOAC Wright W-2000 [VR-compatible] 2.1 years ago

    @SasuValentin2 do you want me to get banned?
    Also, this is a plane game, not the United States of America. This is not the place for you to express extreme views, because having opinions is okay, but the moment you start escalating the situation, you are setting up a conflict and spreading hate, onto a community that is extremely diverse and is maintaining harmony. This is completely unacceptable.
    If you still really want to tell the entire world that you hate furries, sure, go ahead, but bear the consequences yourself. Do NOT try to push this responsibility onto other people, because these actions are YOUR decision, not mine.
    If you are going to further escalate this conversation, reminder that this is MY post, and I have the right to delete whatever you say.

    +1
  • Glidelite Model 55X 2.1 years ago

    @CooperFilms001 and try to show the entire plane

    +1
  • Something was wrong 2.1 years ago

    Yeah I got the same issues too; it's probably a technical fault

    +1
  • CA1 2.1 years ago

    @Yourlocalhuman you get at most 10 upvotes per build, which for a platinum user like you, isn’t much.

    +1
  • Points Challenge (CLOSED) 2.1 years ago

    Are we allowed to upload more than one build? @MrCOPTY

    +1
  • Moving reuploads on a seperate account 2.1 years ago

    Well that's great, hope to see your builds soon! :)

    +1
  • Demon 170 Teaser 2.1 years ago

    Letter after S

    +1
  • CA1 2.1 years ago

    @Hiimakeplanes in my opinion, the reason why you’re lacking upvotes is because you post too frequently. You may have a lot of free time, and you’re joining a war challenge, but the thing is that you’re posting 1-2 uploads per day. Very few people want to keep upvoting your stuff on a daily basis, and eventually they just don’t bother to upvote. So that’s why you don’t get many upvotes per build.
    Besides, once you post a new build, very few people are going to look at your previous build, because people only like the newest things. And with you posting a new craft 12 hours after the previous one, most of your upvotes will happen within that 12-hour frame. This is why I personally try to space out my post dates, keeping them at least 1 week apart, or at the very minimum, 2 days apart, so that I can “squeeze” the greatest possible number of upvotes out of them.
    I don’t expect you to quit the war challenge, but I’m just telling you that this is why your builds don’t have many upvotes, and it’s up to you to decide what to do with this advice.
    @Yourlocalhuman, the same thing applies to you.

    +1
  • Glidelite Model 55X 2.1 years ago

    Great design, but word of advice: the thumbnail photo should show the front of the plane, not the back; I was having trouble trying to figure out the shape of the plane from the thumbnail photo.

    +1
  • FDL-T1 Tara [LCA Challenge] 2.1 years ago

    looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong

    +1
  • MODERN Propeller Bomber 2.1 years ago

    I’m gonna be honest… the thumbnails are misleading, which isn’t allowed.
    Also, are those upvotes done by alts???

    +1
  • T-03 "Dorito" 2.1 years ago

    @SimpleStudent I don’t know, and those who do know are obligated to not share it.
    Oh, and JP11 just got banned too.

    +1
  • T-03 "Dorito" 2.1 years ago

    @100 That's fast

    +1
  • T-03 "Dorito" 2.1 years ago

    All tags were requested from my teaser.

    +1
  • Antonov An-218 2.2 years ago

    From the models, this plane looks like an A330 with the capacity of a 777

    +1
  • WDC: Walkers, Crawlers, and Harpies (1939) 2.2 years ago

    Soon we gonna have monsters fighting each other in this war challenge

    +1
  • Guys is Alivepan Banned? 2.2 years ago

    @CL125 and just when I finished making a submission for his challenge…

    +1
  • The Light Combat Aircraft Challenge (Closed) 2.2 years ago

    Also did you get a strike or something? I get redirected to the homepage when I click on your profile.

    +1
  • When I reach 1000 points 2.2 years ago

    Word of advice, it'd be better if you made the plane before you post a teaser

    +1
  • Korean War Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 2.2 years ago

    @LieutenantSOT Da Nang, Hue and Phong Nha

    +1
  • Korean War Specifications Challenge! [CLOSED] 2.2 years ago

    Me who's going to North Vietnam in 2 weeks:

    +1
  • 5 min challenge A320 (1 FOLLOWER SPECIAL) 2.2 years ago

    Cockpit looks workable, but other than that, yeah it doesn't look good. This is because the proportion of width to length is incorrect, and the primary wings are too small.
    Here's one thing you can do: use the blueprint tool.
    It can be found by expanding the "eye" icon and looking at the top left. When you open the blueprint tool, you can upload side and top-view blueprints of the aircraft that you're making. And these blueprints can be found on the internet, so it'll be easy.
    Using the blueprint tool really helps you get the length and wingspan of the plane right, and as a result it doesn't look ugly.
    Oh, and by using the blueprint tool, you can upload your own custom screenshots, and you won't need to post with views of the ugly designer anymore. It'll help you get a lot more upvotes.
    Hope I helped you, and if you have any (non-FT related) questions, just ask me.

    +1
  • Into the Jet Age / Cost of Innovation ~ 2.2 years ago

    @LonelyAustrianUhlan the fatigue was indeed highest at the windows (and doors), but my point is that it wasn’t the shape that was the problem.
    From this article:

    ”Many readers familiar with the Comet disasters might be wondering why, with this article drawing to its close, I have yet to utter the phrase “square windows.” But the truth is that “square windows” never had anything to do with the Comet crashes. The windows were not and never were square — in fact, you can see for yourself in the above image, which shows a Comet 1 window next to a modern Boeing 737 window. Can you tell which is which? You probably can, but not because one is any more “square” than the other.
    The cause of the Comet’s difficulties was not the shape of its windows, but de Havilland’s failure to predict the complex load pathways and stress concentrations in the material. And in terms of fundamental design deficiencies, the most significant fact was that the fuselage skin was simply too thin, leaving it unable to withstand the local stresses generated around its perfectly normal-shaped windows. The lessons of the twin disasters were therefore much more profound than the oft-repeated concluding line, “and no one ever built a jet with square windows again.” In reality, no one was ever that stupid! But the Comet crashes did fundamentally alter the process of designing airliners, bringing about a more thorough and regimented approach to the problem of metal fatigue. And the inquiry was a milestone of its own, establishing many of the techniques which form the basis of modern investigative practice, from mathematical modeling to underwater recovery. The story of the Comet, then, is a tale of firsts, both the positive kind, and the dangerous kind — the perils of pushing into the unknown. The solution to the Comet mystery was not reckoned in money or manpower, but neither was its creation. The only thing that would have saved the Comet was knowledge, but in the history of human innovation, seldom have we learned what we must do without first learning what we must not.”

    +1
  • LT-4 Azgrell 2.2 years ago

    Interesting colour scheme

    +1
  • burger king 2.2 years ago

    kurger bing

    +1
  • I ran yet another 20k part ship... 2.2 years ago

    @Aviator01 16GB installed, 8.96 being used so far

    +1
  • The Original SimplePlanes Launch Trailer 2.2 years ago

    Looking at this, I realise how far SP has come since it first started

    +1
  • Hi,I come from Viet Nam.This is my first post. 2.2 years ago

    Hi there, welcome to SP! I'm from Singapore too. And I'm going on a trip to Da Nang, Vietnam in 3 weeks so see you there I guess!

    Remember to read the rules and follow them, otherwise moderators will come for you.

    +1
  • Hughes MD530F-N4692F 2.2 years ago

    @Ajplebo some tips for making better thumbnails:
    - Increase width of the photo to make it fit into the screenshot box (this can be done by cropping the top).
    - Take the photo at 8.00 or 16.00 SP time; it can achieve the best colours. You can manually set the time in the game using the “Settings” icon in the pause menu.
    - If your phone has a photo-editing function, I recommend you use it. It really helps a lot.
    - Finally, use fonts that look “modern”, so that the text fits with this modern-looking helicopter. Some examples are Arial (bold), Roboto and Helvetica (I personally use DIN Alternate).

    Other than that, amazing helicopter. Hope these tips help to make more people notice your creations!

    +1
  • RNVS Defiant: Battlecruiser, Serpent Slayer 2.2 years ago

    I will never understand how people have the computer capacity to run this, let alone build it

    +1
  • There's quite a lot of teasers lately 2.2 years ago

    To be fair, the forums were kinda made for teasers...

    +1
  • Li-4 Airliner 2.2 years ago

    Looks a lot like an Electra (L-188)

    +1
  • Hmm, 6,009 2.2 years ago

    And no more 69 in your point count, we need to keep you clean!

    +1
  • Spoiler - New VR Project 2.2 years ago

    The fuselage colours remind me of a certain flag…

    +1
  • Thomas the tank : edit Thomas the dank engin 2.2 years ago

    i am crying at the sight of this beauty

    +1
  • Airship Challenge CLOSED 2.2 years ago

    Okay, I'm joining...

    +1
  • W O R M 2.2 years ago

    wrm

    +1
  • Where You From? 2.2 years ago

    I come from Singapore, Singapore (yes it repeats twice because the capital city is the entire country)

    +1
  • AI MiG-21 improved 2.2 years ago

    Imagine this as an AI chasing you around

    +1