THE NOSTALGIA AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHRJSHHSHHSDHSGFGSH
Also when I did this flight I became lost halfway through, missed all the remaining targets, and gave up
Right after that I realised that I was using the App Store version of SP, which didn't allow mods, and fell into despair (i have the Steam version now)
🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
also @Mastereldo you have only 445 more points to gold, keep it up!
@VinFage it would make the instructions more clear, but people like short and sweet thumbnails. Besides I've seen that most people here get what a "never built" plane is
Oh yeah, about my list of livery projects, I'm going to move the list to a forum post and link it to every airplane post after this one.
The advantage is that it makes the description look less wordy, I don't need to copy and paste the list every time, and I can place photos
@5cmPak38aufPzKpfwIISfl901
- Originality: 10/10 (extremely rare concept, also this looks like the only Martin 262 in SP)
- Looks: 12/15 (very nice, very accurate, but no fuselage wing)
- Performance: 12/15 (powerful and manoeuvrable, I had a fun time flying it and trying to shoot tankers down with it)
- Features: 5/5 (guns)
- Overall: 39/45 (good job! I'm saving this)
If anyone isn’t satisfied with their points, you can redo the plane and submit it as a new aircraft, and I will mark it separately. Do note however that you can only make at most 3 planes.
@Gabriel747 I’ve searched Google, and there was no actual concept for a passenger B-52 produced by Boeing, if there was I would have seen blueprints, models or maybe even prototypes. As such, I can’t accept the plane.
Found&Explained doesn’t just make videos about “never-built” aircraft, it also makes videos on “what if this plane was a passenger plane?”, which are purely hypothetical questions and NOT videos on real-life concepts, if you get what I’m saying.The passenger B-52 is one of those videos.
However, a passenger version of the Lockheed C-5 Galaxy was proposed, called the L-5000, so if you want to make it feel free to do so
@Hiimakeplanes
- Originality: 7/10 (the P6M's listed as one of the example aircraft, and there are several other P6Ms on the site)
- Looks: 9/15 (this is quite accurate but it's small, also i know that since it's a block plane the details are very simplistic and minimal and it makes it look nice, but I judge based on realism and detail. Also the actual plane has landing gear, despite being a seaplane)
- Performance: 12/15 (quite decent performance, very manoeuvrable)
- Features: 5/5 (has weapon)
- Overall: 33/45 (nothing else to say)
@Vincentmenard
- Originality: 9/10 (i never heard of this plane before this post)
- Looks: 9/15 (looks ok, but the real plane's bigger, and the nose isn't supposed to be this pointy. Also the nose gear's painted white and the default cockpit sticks out)
- Performance: 11/15 (flies ok, but pitches up a lot at full thrust without trim)
- Features: 5/5 (the experimental plane has no features, so)
- Overall: 34/45 (good, just work on the accuracy bit)
This should become the official SimplePlanes commercial
THE NOSTALGIA AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHRJSHHSHHSDHSGFGSH
Also when I did this flight I became lost halfway through, missed all the remaining targets, and gave up
+2Right after that I realised that I was using the App Store version of SP, which didn't allow mods, and fell into despair (i have the Steam version now)
Correction: 415 (because i upvoted both moais)
+1🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
+1also @Mastereldo you have only 445 more points to gold, keep it up!
Oh hey you got gold! Congrats! @Brololxd
+2@VinFage it would make the instructions more clear, but people like short and sweet thumbnails. Besides I've seen that most people here get what a "never built" plane is
LESSSSGOOOOLD
I will forever cement this as the plane that brought me to gold, even though that may or may not be true
+2Accepted
I literally just watched the found&explained video on this lol
So a challenge is now officially my most upvoted plane
Oh yeah, about my list of livery projects, I'm going to move the list to a forum post and link it to every airplane post after this one.
The advantage is that it makes the description look less wordy, I don't need to copy and paste the list every time, and I can place photos
copa
Nice, I’m working on the United Airlines version of this plane
+1Also T
T
@LoneSpaceGaming ok
@TheSonOfThunder yes you can
@AirJMC nice
+1tbh i don't really play TFS anymore, my friend does though
@CooperFilms001 isn't that just a Boeing 707 with a t-tail? lol
+1@5cmPak38aufPzKpfwIISfl901
- Originality:
10/10(extremely rare concept, also this looks like the only Martin 262 in SP)- Looks:
12/15(very nice, very accurate, but no fuselage wing)- Performance:
12/15(powerful and manoeuvrable, I had a fun time flying it and trying to shoot tankers down with it)- Features:
5/5(guns)- Overall:
39/45(good job! I'm saving this)@CooperFilms001 the -400 didn't have 4 wings, they just changed the engines to propfans (although now that you mention it, a 727 quadjet sounds good)
+1Reminds me of the YB-49
+3At this point I have exactly 4,727 points
+4Coincidence? I think not
Little bit of self-promotion: I just made a new plane, it's fictional though
@JustWingIt 🤪
When the new player aggressively spams the mirror tool on the tutorial plane (yes I know that's not how it works it's a joke)
@Kmserika are you talking about the german flying wing bomber?
@alexJgameYTukraine000000 only real planes allowed
@MOSAstroBoy that would be political
+1Most normal countryball in ohio
Also the Ohio countryball shape is different, so it can challenge you
Make ohio countryball (i guarantee you’ll get upvotes)
Approved
another person posted a very similar plane (the XP-54) 2 days ago
+1Oh no I saw it
Congratulations on finally discovering the forums
So you’re saying that this comment can VTOL, since you can see it? @Hiimakeplanes
@Gabriel747 Nice drawings, it’s just that the An-225’s out of scale
Also here’s an A320NEO I drew from memory yesterday
my bad
am joining
@Vandermone 那些就可以
@Vandermone 不算，它必须是一架打算生产的飞机
Salmon sushi is my favourite
+1Big Brother is watching you!
Also T
+1If anyone isn’t satisfied with their points, you can redo the plane and submit it as a new aircraft, and I will mark it separately. Do note however that you can only make at most 3 planes.
@Gabriel747 I’ve searched Google, and there was no actual concept for a passenger B-52 produced by Boeing, if there was I would have seen blueprints, models or maybe even prototypes. As such, I can’t accept the plane.
Found&Explained doesn’t just make videos about “never-built” aircraft, it also makes videos on “what if this plane was a passenger plane?”, which are purely hypothetical questions and NOT videos on real-life concepts, if you get what I’m saying.The passenger B-52 is one of those videos.
However, a passenger version of the Lockheed C-5 Galaxy was proposed, called the L-5000, so if you want to make it feel free to do so
Approved
ooh a tail-sitter
@Vincentmenard you can submit up to 3 aircraft, so if you make an updated version I’ll consider it as your 2nd aircraft
@Gabriel747 no, since a passenger B-52 was never a real concept
æ on the tail
+1bonus: uh sir i hit a rock
@Hiimakeplanes
- Originality:
7/10(the P6M's listed as one of the example aircraft, and there are several other P6Ms on the site)- Looks:
9/15(this is quite accurate but it's small, also i know that since it's a block plane the details are very simplistic and minimal and it makes it look nice, but I judge based on realism and detail. Also the actual plane has landing gear, despite being a seaplane)- Performance:
12/15(quite decent performance, very manoeuvrable)- Features:
5/5(has weapon)- Overall:
33/45(nothing else to say)@Vincentmenard
- Originality:
9/10(i never heard of this plane before this post)- Looks:
9/15(looks ok, but the real plane's bigger, and the nose isn't supposed to be this pointy. Also the nose gear's painted white and the default cockpit sticks out)- Performance:
11/15(flies ok, but pitches up a lot at full thrust without trim)- Features:
5/5(the experimental plane has no features, so)- Overall:
34/45(good, just work on the accuracy bit)