42.1k Ren Comments

  • Ekranoplan Korabl Maket 4.9 years ago

    t

    +1
  • New Tutorial Plane 4.9 years ago

    HELLKESHA, YOU'RE NEXT...

    That sounds like a threat lmao

    +1
  • Messerschmitt Me-262 A1-a 'Schwalbe' 4.9 years ago

    @RuvienRuvienTheCitizen
    Np. Just waiting for the cooldown...
    Ahhhhhhhhhhhh there we go

    +1
  • Messerschmitt Me-262 A1-a 'Schwalbe' 4.9 years ago

    @RuvienRuvienTheCitizen
    Np. Btw you are as active as me lol

    +1
  • I'm Plane66373637 4.9 years ago

    Hi PIane66373637! Im Dad!

    +1
  • HARUHI Suzumiya 4.9 years ago

    THANK GOD!! No dumpster fire!

    +1
  • Mikoyan Gurevich MiG-31 Foxhound 4.9 years ago

    You didn't tag me. No teaser. My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined.

    +1
  • Share your ideas here 4.9 years ago

    Make this: The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
    In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
    The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

    +1
  • Sikorsky S-72 "X-Wing" (Hybrid Helicopter) 4.9 years ago

    The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
    In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
    The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

    +1
  • SUH-13H "Orion" 4.9 years ago

    The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
    In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
    The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

    +1
  • why am I suffer 4.9 years ago

    The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
    In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
    The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

    +1
  • Why is everyone jumping onto the,"BoganBoganTheMan" trend? 4.9 years ago

    @FishMiner
    FishFishTheMiner

    +1
  • Rant about "Sorry for inactivity" posts 4.9 years ago

    Sorry for inactivity. I wouldve commented earlier, but I was inactive. Im so sorry community. Plzz forgive me.

    +1
  • I’m doing requests 4.9 years ago

    @KangaKangaTheRoo
    Yes. It is my job to permanantely moderate and watch his posts, and respond to all comments that come. It is my duty.

    +1
  • Dear Builders, 4.9 years ago

    Donate at #cockpitviewmatters.com

    +1
  • Announcement about my ipads age 4.9 years ago

    Jokes on you because 200 parts lags my chromebook!

    +1
  • Share your ideas here 4.9 years ago

    B-2! F22!

    +1
  • [TEASER] Incoming MiG! 4.9 years ago

    @KangaKangaTheRoo
    Sounds good. :)

    +1
  • 4 months in SP 4.9 years ago

    @Gluck
    Thx! And I'll tag you!

    +1
  • Coming Soon... 4.9 years ago

    @MajorSix
    Agreed!!!!!!

    +1
  • Boeing B-52H Stratofortress/BUFF (Thanks for 20K!) 4.9 years ago

    @KangaKangaTheRoo
    Actually, I just suck at round panelling XD and didn't wanna steal someone elses

    +1
  • [Free To Use] Auto Roll Fixer 4.9 years ago

    @SavageMan
    Most of my planes have this issue. You are the god that saved the game from this curse

    +1
  • [Free To Use] Auto Roll Fixer 4.9 years ago

    THANK THE LORD

    +1
  • Boring Rocket 17 4.9 years ago

    @SouthEngine
    Is it not allowed to build for points?

    +1
  • A question to the community regarding uploads 4.9 years ago

    @KangaKangaTheRoo
    This is why I don't do stealth fighters....

    +1
  • SP's Community Review (October 2020) 4.9 years ago

    @Viridi
    NP

    +1
  • P-47 D-25 Thunderbolt 4.9 years ago

    Thanks for tagging me like I asked.

    +1
  • What are creator's "companies"? 4.9 years ago

    @Oramamonvehicles
    The aircraft IS the chat if its unlisted.

    +1
  • A message to blueobull... 4.9 years ago

    @EternalDarkness
    One
    Two
    Three
    Four
    Five
    Six

    +1
  • Push-configuration ! (TOURNAMENT) (CLOSED) 4.9 years ago

    Do 335 is coming soon, ya'll!

    +1
  • Futuristic General Aviation Challenge (CLOSED) 4.9 years ago

    God dammit i thought this was a high quality aircraft.....
    just a challenge with thumbnail

    +1
  • [TEASER] The Voodoo(s) 4.9 years ago

    @KangaKangaTheRoo
    Smh game developers

    +1
  • A message to Blue0Bull. 4.9 years ago

    @BoganBoganTheWoman
    No u

    +1
  • A message to Blue0Bull. 4.9 years ago

    You know who should get cancelled? You.

    +1
  • youtube thumbnails using SP pictures... 4.9 years ago

    LAWSUIT INCOMING

    +1
  • Boeing B-52H Stratofortress/BUFF (Thanks for 20K!) 4.9 years ago

    @EternalDarkness
    Could you please make it a successor to this challenge?

    +1
  • The General Lee | 1969 Dodge Charger 4.9 years ago

    That was an entertaining read lol

    +1
  • Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21PF Fishbed 4.9 years ago

    @SPairforce
    Your criticism is fine, and in fact apprieciated. These people just hate on the build because "Kor plane get more updoots than me WAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!" XD

    +1
  • Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21PF Fishbed 4.9 years ago

    @FoxtrotTheSergal
    Dude issa serious build...

    +1
  • Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-31 Foxhound 4.9 years ago

    @Cabbage17
    sup

    +1
  • LEAVING TIME. 4.9 years ago

    Why? Don't delete yur account plz

    +1
  • 4th gen fighter/interceptor challenge RESULTS!! 4.9 years ago

    @tsampoy
    The Typhoon ALMOST got 3rd, but then the MiG-31 came in XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

    +1
  • 4th gen fighter/interceptor challenge RESULTS!! 4.9 years ago

    @MobileFriendly
    @SavageMan
    @ollielebananiaCFSP
    Congrats on winning! Your prizes come soon!

    +1
  • Mikoyan-Gourevitch MiG-31 Foxhound 4.9 years ago

    You won!!

    +1
  • Mikoyan-Gourevitch MiG-31 Foxhound 4.9 years ago

    Design: 10/10
    Performance: 9/10
    Description: 10/10
    Quality: 10/10
    Bonus: 5+

    Overall grade: 15/10

    +1
  • A Jet 4.9 years ago

    @GriffonGriffonTheCrosswind
    Yup

    +1
  • Website glitch regarding successor aircraft 4.9 years ago

    Its to make sure you don't farm points from making successors to your own planes.

    +1
  • Coming soon (ish) 4.9 years ago

    Alt text! Coming soon!

    +1
  • I am mad 4.9 years ago

    @tsampoy
    Agreed

    +1
  • Boeing or Airbus? 4.9 years ago

    Boeing

    +1