41.9k Ren Comments

  • CT-7-A5 'Kämpfer' 4.7 years ago

    Me 262 wants to know your location

    +1
  • tank 4.7 years ago

    @BobBobTheLandia
    legit

    +1
  • Titan 3.0 4.7 years ago

    Design: 5/10
    Performance: 7/10
    Quality: 5/10
    Description: 3/10

    Overall grade: 6/10

    Notes: Don't judge a book by its cover. This is better than it looks.

    +1
  • Tupolev Tu-95MS6 "Bear" 4.7 years ago

    @Parehare
    Why?

    +1
  • Martin B-26B-55-MA Marauder 4.7 years ago

    Omg this is amazing! I'm speechless! The Marauder is a sick plane, and I'm glad to finally find a good one! They're pretty rare on the site. Excellent work dude.

    +1
  • Tupolev Tu-95MS6 "Bear" 4.7 years ago

    @Noahater5245
    Yeah sure!

    +1
  • Curtiss P-40 Warhawk [TEASER] 4.7 years ago

    T

    +1
  • Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-15 'Fagot' 4.7 years ago

    @RuvienRuvienTheCitizen
    Kinda odd that Fagot is the legit NATO reporting name lmao

    +1
  • Super Bored 4.7 years ago

    @RuvienRuvienTheCitizen
    Np

    +1
  • THANK YOU ALL!!! 4.7 years ago

    @KangaKangaTheRoo
    Thx!

    +1
  • GAMF-02A Camille 4.7 years ago

    @Highground
    I lost many braincells here

    +1
  • pet the andrew 4.7 years ago

    69 upvotes
    nice

    +1
  • Goodbye (sort of...) ok not really 4.7 years ago

    Bye

    +1
  • Angled U.S. Roundels 4.7 years ago

    Finally

    +1
  • [TEASER] My first paneled cockpit! 4.7 years ago

    @Strucker
    Thank you!

    +1
  • An Ace's Plane 4.7 years ago

    @F104Deathtrap
    That must've been terrifying! I'm working on a replica of his F-4C now

    +1
  • New Website Feature!! 4.7 years ago

    When the devs dont make a post so you make one for them:

    +1
  • An Ace's Plane 4.7 years ago

    P-38

    +1
  • Tupolev Tu-95MS6 "Bear" 4.7 years ago

    @LunchBox
    Me. Bagel took screenshots.

    +1
  • An Ace's Plane 4.7 years ago

    Damn thats sick

    +1
  • Tupolev Tu-95MS6 "Bear" 4.7 years ago

    @Archanis
    XD lol

    +1
  • Napalm Crop Dusting 4.7 years ago

    @Cabbage17
    Np! This is so cool!

    +1
  • okay... 4.7 years ago

    @banbantheman
    lol

    +1
  • okay... 4.7 years ago

    @banbantheman
    Not impossible. He is the unacceptably impossible and the word impossible itself

    +1
  • So many Robots... 4.7 years ago

    @Strucker
    Its a trend now

    +1
  • The Old Fashion MiG-3 4.7 years ago

    I hope this doesn't become a warzone for your sake. I know the experience personally and it sucks.

    +1
  • [TEASER] Antothicc An 225THICC 4.7 years ago

    @BeefyIsNotSus
    Beefy kinda sus NGL

    +1
  • Remember Parzival4741? Here's an update on him 4.7 years ago

    That must be terrifying. Tell him I wish him the best.

    +1
  • My username 4.7 years ago

    You're infected with the username plague

    +1
  • North American XB-70 Valkyrie 4.7 years ago

    Incredible! Its so good!

    +1
  • Degradation and SimplePlanes 4.7 years ago

    @Spacedoge12345plane
    I used to like this place ngl.....

    +1
  • [Tutorial] Build an Airliner step by step 4.7 years ago

    T. American

    +1
  • Degradation and SimplePlanes 4.7 years ago

    Shut up. I cannot count how many times my aircraft have been SPECIFICALLY called out by other users. I would like to agree with @Blue0Bull's comment, but, in SP, critique is "THIS BUILD SUCKS I HATE IT xdddddddddd". At least for me. Stop complaining about "Oh Ren got lots of upvotes and almost plat" and go let others enjoy the site. You minority are ruining it for everyone.

    +1
  • Tupolev Tu-95MS6 "Bear" 4.7 years ago

    @SPairforce
    Props to me for using Turboprops ?

    +1
  • North America B-25J Mitchell (AURI M-448) 4.7 years ago

    Those engines....WOW

    +1
  • Ekranoplan Korabl Maket 4.7 years ago

    t

    +1
  • New Tutorial Plane 4.7 years ago

    HELLKESHA, YOU'RE NEXT...

    That sounds like a threat lmao

    +1
  • Messerschmitt Me-262 A1-a 'Schwalbe' 4.7 years ago

    @RuvienRuvienTheCitizen
    Np. Just waiting for the cooldown...
    Ahhhhhhhhhhhh there we go

    +1
  • Messerschmitt Me-262 A1-a 'Schwalbe' 4.7 years ago

    @RuvienRuvienTheCitizen
    Np. Btw you are as active as me lol

    +1
  • I'm Plane66373637 4.7 years ago

    Hi PIane66373637! Im Dad!

    +1
  • HARUHI Suzumiya 4.7 years ago

    THANK GOD!! No dumpster fire!

    +1
  • Mikoyan Gurevich MiG-31 Foxhound 4.7 years ago

    You didn't tag me. No teaser. My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined.

    +1
  • Share your ideas here 4.7 years ago

    Make this: The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
    In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
    The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

    +1
  • Sikorsky S-72 "X-Wing" (Hybrid Helicopter) 4.7 years ago

    The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
    In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
    The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

    +1
  • SUH-13H "Orion" 4.7 years ago

    The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
    In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
    The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

    +1
  • why am I suffer 4.7 years ago

    The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
    In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
    The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

    +1
  • Why is everyone jumping onto the,"BoganBoganTheMan" trend? 4.7 years ago

    @FishMiner
    FishFishTheMiner

    +1
  • Rant about "Sorry for inactivity" posts 4.7 years ago

    Sorry for inactivity. I wouldve commented earlier, but I was inactive. Im so sorry community. Plzz forgive me.

    +1
  • I’m doing requests 4.8 years ago

    @KangaKangaTheRoo
    Yes. It is my job to permanantely moderate and watch his posts, and respond to all comments that come. It is my duty.

    +1