@ThatKindaWeeb It's finnicky. You need to find the .xml file of your creation and open it with a text editor (i.e. notepad). At the top there should be a line saying url="". Take the six-letter code from the url of this post and paste it in between the quotes. Save and then try updating the XML via the site. Here's a better guide.
That being said, I'm not sure how this works on mobile.
@Graingy I mean
The F-16C V5 was my 6th F-16
The F-15C V4 was my 5th F-15
I think it's good to remake the same aircraft a couple times, it shows how much you've improved Something something practiced 10,000 kicks once vs practiced 1 kick 10,000 times
I also just like these planes :P
@Graingy Yeah true, this is my 4th Su-27 now so I kinda know what to expect
The color also helps for contrasting against the black and white blueprints
.
Actually, it's a cake
@EngieWeeb Ah that makes sense
I read up a bit more on the ML so I might work on the FM a bit more, didn't know how much the weight was reduced from the previous models
@Ac3Zodiac @Kangy Made an update to the flight model, guess I took the Constant Peg pilots' criticisms a little too seriously :P (And I guess they didn't have MLD's)
.
The poor turning at full-sweep was more due to excessive deflection of the elevators, so it now deflects less at full-sweep
@Khanskaya I would like to make a remastered F-5E at some point. Although since university is a thing, progress is extremely slow and I have other projects I want to do first.
@EngieWeeb It was actually easier than I thought
My dumb brain used to think 25% larger airframe meant it was actually scaled by 1.25 but its just longer fuselage and wider wings
@PriusCat I found out about Have Glass V on accident when looking for paint schemes for my first F-16 years ago
I suddenly remembered it recently and thought it would be cool on the V5 Viper
Could be rotators or pistons? If the head of a rotator/piston is attached to your aircraft's main body, it can disable collisions. That's what happened to my F-22 when I was making it
@EngieWeeb I just used it for a rough idea of what the cockpit and CFT's should look like. With how innaccurate blueprints can be online, as long as I get the general feel and look right I'm happy
.
What's even worse is when different views of the same blueprint don't align
@ThatKindaWeeb It's finnicky. You need to find the .xml file of your creation and open it with a text editor (i.e. notepad). At the top there should be a line saying
+1url="". Take the six-letter code from the url of this post and paste it in between the quotes. Save and then try updating the XML via the site. Here's a better guide.That being said, I'm not sure how this works on mobile.
@Graingy I mean
+1The F-16C V5 was my 6th F-16
The F-15C V4 was my 5th F-15
I think it's good to remake the same aircraft a couple times, it shows how much you've improved
Something something practiced 10,000 kicks once vs practiced 1 kick 10,000 times
I also just like these planes :P
@Graingy Yeah true, this is my 4th Su-27 now so I kinda know what to expect
+1The color also helps for contrasting against the black and white blueprints
.
Actually, it's a cake
@Graingy I do this with all my builds in the early stages to help me visualize things
+1I guess it does look a little silly :v
@rexzion the flanker from digital combat simulator!?!?!
+1@PlayMinecraft Nose Wheel Steering
+1NWS high lets the nosewheel steer more so you can taxi on a carrier easier
@TwoTurboMan It's been going, I'm redoing the loadouts at the moment
+1I took a bit of a break over Christmas and New Years
@EngieWeeb Ah that makes sense
+1I read up a bit more on the ML so I might work on the FM a bit more, didn't know how much the weight was reduced from the previous models
@Ac3Zodiac @Kangy Made an update to the flight model, guess I took the Constant Peg pilots' criticisms a little too seriously :P (And I guess they didn't have MLD's)
+1.
The poor turning at full-sweep was more due to excessive deflection of the elevators, so it now deflects less at full-sweep
Please use your jetstream 👇
+1@SPAircraftOfficial @MAPA @Khanskaya
@rexzion Ooh maybe
+1@Th3Missil3 Not really sure
+1I think I'm more focused on the MiG-23 so that'll be done first, but no guarantees
@ssenmodnar At the time of this teaser, it was around 200, but right now it is at 350.
+1lemonade
+1apple juice
beer
@All for more complicated builds, its best to mirror parts individually instead of using the mirror tool
+101000001 01101001 01110010 01110000 01101111 01110010 01110100
+1(Airport, computer-land)
A good looking stealth fuselage in less than a 100 parts...
+1That is actually nuts
@32 oof. Definitely not an open casket for this one
+1"Time to leave!"
+1- F-14A/B RIO Jester "The Ejector"
Should be fixed now :)
+1@TheOfficalMarylander @Majakalona Destruction 100
+1@Khanskaya I would like to make a remastered F-5E at some point. Although since university is a thing, progress is extremely slow and I have other projects I want to do first.
+1@EngieWeeb soon (tm)
+1He freestylin'
+1@DatMaluchGuy19 yeah np
+1You don't need to ask
[REDACTED]
+15th gen biplane doesn't exist it can't hurt y-
+1Please use your jetstream 👇
+1@ToeTips @Th3Missil3 @Hybridmotor
Kv-Su-152-100-85-2-Zis-5Y
+1Chonkhog
+1@ssenmodnar Thanks, can confirm
+1@EngieWeeb It was actually easier than I thought
+1My dumb brain used to think 25% larger airframe meant it was actually scaled by 1.25 but its just longer fuselage and wider wings
@V I just heard about it too.
+1The fact that people like that exist justifies my loss of hope in humanity.
@ssenmodnar I've been working on this one since before the F-15C was published
+1Please use your jetstream 👇
+1@AC13OJ
@X99STRIKER I don't know!
+1fling
PLAY OF THE GAME
+1.
A-10C Thunderbolt II GAU-8 (PGU-14/B API) Warrior IFV
@PriusCat I found out about Have Glass V on accident when looking for paint schemes for my first F-16 years ago
+1I suddenly remembered it recently and thought it would be cool on the V5 Viper
@Pilotgoose
+1flies past the missile launchers
I'm a genius!
is about to slam into the wall at the back of the hangar
Oh no!
Could be rotators or pistons? If the head of a rotator/piston is attached to your aircraft's main body, it can disable collisions. That's what happened to my F-22 when I was making it
+1Destruction 100
+1@EngieWeeb I just used it for a rough idea of what the cockpit and CFT's should look like. With how innaccurate blueprints can be online, as long as I get the general feel and look right I'm happy
+1.
What's even worse is when different views of the same blueprint don't align
+1map de_miragesv_cheats 1
@Th3Missil3 @ImAcarperson @Gabriel747
+1The sun never sets on the British Emp- err... Commonwealth
+1@Cir8 @Maverick09 @SourDoughBread Thanks!
+11337
+1Wait, it's all wing?
+1@Kangy to make it an integer :v
+1@Sundown You should have variables Turret1Elev, Turret1Hdg, and Turret1Range, which is where the elevation, heading, and range FT go.
In the rotators, you should have Turret1Elev and Turret1Hdg as your inputs. The FT for the gun goes into the activation group.
+1