If we find the derivative with respect to x of 9 + 10, we get 0 since both 9 and 10 are constants.
Then, integrating that 0 with respect to x, we get C.
C is an arbitrary constant and thus, could be equal to 21.
.
it's 19 lol
@SyntheticL J-7II would be cool, maybe
@GAMINGOTAKU66 Yep! I hate fighting this thing in an uptier.
@JustLookingForFriends NATO is kinda all over the place with their codenames. Sometimes you get something cool like Flanker or Fulcrum, but then there's stuff like Fishbed and Hormone.
@JustLookingForFriends fagot
/ˈfaɡət/
noun a bundle of sticks or twigs bound together as fuel. a bundle of iron rods bound together for reheating, welding, and hammering into bars.
.
Blame NATO
Technically, you probably could.
Using FT, you could have the gun fire when a target is in a certain targetDistance, targetHeading, and targetElevation.
Not sure what that code would look like exactly though.
@Kangy For some reason i got a bad feeling about this...
Should've realized Gaijin would monopolize off the most anticipated aircraft in the game ever. Fair play I guess. Ground RB will be crazy when the update drops.
@Korzalerke I know about this, but I only use it for decreasing lift actually. When I resize wings, I decrease the liftScale to compensate for the "increased" wing area. (i.e. 0.5 scale wings produce twice as much lift as same size 1 scale wing.)
Increasing liftScale beyond it's normal value can lead to unrealistically low AOA and other weird flight characteristics.
o7
+1Good memories.
el plan
Its kinda weird how similar it still looks to the F-14 from certain angles
+2@R2d2hunter C̷̱͉͎̤͍̣͔̬̻̈̐͛̒͝ǫ̸͔͎̠͇͑́́̅̌̐̑̃̔̉͑̕ĉ̸̨̜̯̪̳̯̩̥̳̜̹̠̀̂̅͝͠ͅk̶̰̱̹̓̓̾̑̿͌̒̓̔̉͝͠
+3@leekedleek based
@PssyalperdnaEgg With a lot of fuselage cutting.
+2image
Unexpected MGS
+2@OsazPeople that is a common misconception
+1If we find the derivative with respect to x of 9 + 10, we get 0 since both 9 and 10 are constants.
Then, integrating that 0 with respect to x, we get C.
C is an arbitrary constant and thus, could be equal to 21.
.
it's 19 lol
Mom, can we have a pedestal wing fighter?
+2We have a pedestal wing fighter at home.
The pedestal wing fighter at home
@SyntheticL ...male chicken?
+3@SyntheticL J-7II would be cool, maybe
+2@GAMINGOTAKU66 Yep! I hate fighting this thing in an uptier.
@JustLookingForFriends NATO is kinda all over the place with their codenames. Sometimes you get something cool like Flanker or Fulcrum, but then there's stuff like Fishbed and Hormone.
@JustLookingForFriends
+8fagot
/ˈfaɡət/
noun
a bundle of sticks or twigs bound together as fuel.
a bundle of iron rods bound together for reheating, welding, and hammering into bars.
.
Blame NATO
Be careful what you wish for
+1bote
Pog plane
+1@CarrotSlicingCompanyCat Truth is, the game was rigged from the start.
+24Technically, you probably could.
+1Using FT, you could have the gun fire when a target is in a certain targetDistance, targetHeading, and targetElevation.
Not sure what that code would look like exactly though.
Night vision should be pretty easy to add at the very least.
+2Just some postFX filter when you switch to the camera
@DualizedRain ON THE WAY!
+3Yes
+1Manually edit the connections so that each missile you want to fire is connected to the bottom of the same pylon
this is what V2 was for
+1ono
+2@Korzalerke 👍 done
+1SuMi-76 Flogfritter?
+2When it's perfectly mirrored
+1But there's assymetric drag
I wouldn't mind a remastered map.
+9High effort andrew content 👌
+6I concur
+1@Kangy For some reason i got a bad feeling about this...
+1Should've realized Gaijin would monopolize off the most anticipated aircraft in the game ever. Fair play I guess. Ground RB will be crazy when the update drops.
@Kangy What a weird coincidence :l
+1I bet they're doing the A-variant tho
porpoising go brrr
@Chancey21 Anything is a STOL runway if you're brave enough
+4Lookin good!
+1You should be proud of that part count
Steam Link
+2Except you still need a PC lol
@Sparky6004 I used the same FT code to decrease the turn rate at higher speeds as my other aircraft, so I might remove that actually
@Korzalerke I know about this, but I only use it for decreasing lift actually. When I resize wings, I decrease the liftScale to compensate for the "increased" wing area. (i.e. 0.5 scale wings produce twice as much lift as same size 1 scale wing.)
Increasing liftScale beyond it's normal value can lead to unrealistically low AOA and other weird flight characteristics.
@ZeroWithSlashedO They're not the nicest mavericks, but they are part efficient
+1@ThatDr42 i was thinking of this
@SCPCalebkid
+1@CarrotSlicingCompanyCat
+1@Bobyo
@AirCrashInvestigationFLR
@Almost
+1@Bryan5
@donkski
@ZeroWithSlashedO
+2@KDnotSpy
@BeastHunter
are they within 6 feet of each other?
@rexzion do you mind if i release the a10 or do you still want me to wait?
Beehive shells! Or at least i think that's what they were called
@WolfHunter9111
+1d/d🗿(🗿^n)=n🗿^(n-1)
∫(🗿^n)d🗿=[(🗿^n+1)/(n+1)]+C
hi
+2@SCPCalebkid 😳
+4I'm a canon normie: F-15C or F-22A
+1@AeroAeroTheMen I think the XFA-27 is probably the best all rounder in the game
Those MSTM's are no joke