The rules really need to be updated.
We can't say REDACTED JAPANESE CAR COMPANY like you said, but label art is also discouraged afaik.
Someone else also mentioned adding a dedicated challenge section to the website and I think that's a pretty good idea too.
@BestBuilderEverNOCAP I will admit to being a bit of an F-111 fan. Maybe EF-111
@Ihavesnowball The values for the pitch FT and energy retention FT were slightly changed.
Little known fact:
Owning a cat is not owning a pet, it is coexisting with a genetically engineered killing machine that you do not own because it owns you.
@TheCommentaryGuy I found those after I finished the plane on an X-Planes 11 modding forum as well. I'm guessing the model is ripped from AC7 since it has the laser pods. If I do a darkstar again, I'll use them and see how off I was.
@FujiwaraAutoShop Lockheed Martin's website page for the Darkstar makes no mention of the designation SR-72.
.
In this article, a Lockheed Martin Spokesperson states that the Darkstar shown in the film is not representative of the work actually happening at Lockheed Martin.
.
Additionally, the Darkstar is manned while the SR-72 is projected to be a UAV, according to Lockheed Martin as of 2015.
.
While it is commonly referred to as SR-72, I have not seen the Darkstar designated SR-72 in neither the film or official statements from Lockheed Martin yet. And I can't think of a reason to reveal your new military tech in a movie? (Then again, this is America...) AlThOuGh It'S tHe GoVeRnMeNt AnD tHeY'rE oBvIoUsLy HiDiNg SoMeThInG or something.
I wish I could spotlight this.
+3Low part builders gang rise up
The rules really need to be updated.
+2We can't say REDACTED JAPANESE CAR COMPANY like you said, but label art is also discouraged afaik.
Someone else also mentioned adding a dedicated challenge section to the website and I think that's a pretty good idea too.
Quick comment, thanks devs for adding the ability update XML! This feature has been extremely useful.
sin(x)/cos(x)
Karma in action
Ceiling
Fuselage cutting may be a headache but it is such a blessing
+3"Abandoned at an air force museum outside of Moscow is a relic of a machine that looks like it came from outer space. Designed 50 years ago by an eccentric visionary, it was to be the most versatile flying machine ever built. An aircraft that can take off vertically, hover in mid air, land on any surface, cruise at high altitudes, and harness the ground effect. But the story of this remarkable machine and its inventor are still shrouded in mystery."
+1Didn't Gura commit war crimes the last time we gave VTubers fighter jets?
Awesome job avoiding paneling on the nose. I'm gonna have to use this technique. :)
+3@BestBuilderEverNOCAP I will admit to being a bit of an F-111 fan. Maybe EF-111
+1@Ihavesnowball The values for the pitch FT and energy retention FT were slightly changed.
@BeastHunter 🍪
@BeastHunter not quite
+1all gas no such thing as brakes
:D
+1Little known fact:
+2Owning a cat is not owning a pet, it is coexisting with a genetically engineered killing machine that you do not own because it owns you.
@OrionIndustries I didnt even realize it was all your stuff lol
I just see callsign in the title and monke brain gets neuron activation
Simpolplans 2???🤨
+9<<This is AWACS FartStar, confirmed. Intercept and identify the bogies.>>
FOR THE EMPEROR!
+1I also made some slight changes to the F/A-18F's flight model to be consistent with this one.
@TRD @Ren @BestBuilderEverNOCAP
@TheCommentaryGuy @BeastHunter @donkski
+1@TheCommentaryGuy I found those after I finished the plane on an X-Planes 11 modding forum as well. I'm guessing the model is ripped from AC7 since it has the laser pods. If I do a darkstar again, I'll use them and see how off I was.
This should be closed now, shouldn't it?
+1@AdmiralWheatman Yes, it is going through final checks
@asteroidbook345 I always associated that song with the war in general, but I guess it's more of a huey vibe lol
IAS/343 will give you mach at sea level.
+1There probably is a way to make it account for altitude but I haven't tried that
using it i think
<<This is AWACS PooperScooper, you are to take off and fly heading 070 and yeet some bogies.>>
+2time to celebrate
before the green
@FujiwaraAutoShop Lockheed Martin's website page for the Darkstar makes no mention of the designation SR-72.
+4.
In this article, a Lockheed Martin Spokesperson states that the Darkstar shown in the film is not representative of the work actually happening at Lockheed Martin.
.
Additionally, the Darkstar is manned while the SR-72 is projected to be a UAV, according to Lockheed Martin as of 2015.
.
While it is commonly referred to as SR-72, I have not seen the Darkstar designated SR-72 in neither the film or official statements from Lockheed Martin yet. And I can't think of a reason to reveal your new military tech in a movie? (Then again, this is America...)
AlThOuGh It'S tHe GoVeRnMeNt AnD tHeY'rE oBvIoUsLy HiDiNg SoMeThInG or something.
@Harder258 @FujiwaraAutoShop It is never referred to SR-72 in the film. The SR-72 is a completely and slightly more real different development.
+2You're gonna have to take them from my cold, dead hands!
Tell a friend?
@Nerfaddict That is innaccurate
+2@Reworkable im weird and like the low poly aesthetic
@asteroidbook345 Find out next time on...
+1@Ren @BestBuilderEverNOCAP
@G2 @OkaNieba @donkski
@TheCommentaryGuy @X99STRIKER @Bryan5
@HighMike @TheFlyingHusky @BeastHunter
+1How stable is it in VTOL?
Always save before undoing
I miss the dislike button...
big rip
+1Welcome to the club
+1suspension
@HuskyDynamics01 you did the thing
+1smooth(brain,0)
+5