@ollielebananiaCFSP if you don't like it then fine no one asked you to appreciate it but at least don't discredit the creator and call him lazy because he certainly isn't. There is a reason behind his platinum rank. Yes most of his creations are have low part count but that doesn't mean they are worse compared to other 1000 part planes. Also putting a control surface isn't necessary if you already have a good flight model and handling so I don't see any reason to complain here and it's not constructive in any way.
Felon Musk
小黑子开庭的时候带上你的背带裤
+2Kumiko looks cute
@Mantha And now, at last, we have a gateway to ascend to, over and over again...
+7This comment section is peak comedy💀
@MrZa Yeah I believe the B variant has a much shorter canopy due to the VTOL stuff at the back
@ShinyGemsBro Technically the Su-34 is a heavily modified flanker, it's just that the given NATO code name has changed to Fullback
+1@ShinyGemsBro Well you have Su-27UB, a bunch of Su-30s and Su-34
Harrier but on steroids
+1@realSavageMan 我是普陀的
How is this able to withstand multiple AA missiles without blowing up? Did you modify the placement of the cockpit?
+1Looks amazing
@teddyone02 How are Chinese fighter jets falling apart? Which one? Is this another China copies everything joke or am I missing something?
+1Will you make the SSC Tuatara?
Awesome! AC3 deserves more attention
+2@ollielebananiaCFSP if you don't like it then fine no one asked you to appreciate it but at least don't discredit the creator and call him lazy because he certainly isn't. There is a reason behind his platinum rank. Yes most of his creations are have low part count but that doesn't mean they are worse compared to other 1000 part planes. Also putting a control surface isn't necessary if you already have a good flight model and handling so I don't see any reason to complain here and it's not constructive in any way.
+2A C E C O M B A T
+8LoAd ThE nExT sHeLl