@Halcyon215 barak 1, as far as I remember is jointly developed by Israel and india, and they both use it. Or was it barak 8? I don't really remember. Is there a barak 8 to begin with?
Go to the overload menu of the button/switch > button/switch and add interactionType and set that to Toggle.
If it's already done then it's probably a bug.
All mods are inside the "mods" Folder. Or you could search for them in the files. If you remember their file extension, it will make things easier for you.
The part about this being"mobile friendly"is not a lie. Granted, you have to play with graphics settings low and without too many AI aircrafts spawned in. And you know what's the craziest part?my 2gb ram phone, which is more than 5 years old, could run this on max settings. Of course shadow and physics was at low and no other aircraft was spawned in. But still,it ran pretty well.
@Erc90F4RU part count isn't that much of a problem. As long as you can keep the performance cost around 2k, you're good. Trust me, I was surprised myself. I avoided high performance cost by not using rotators and hinges. Instead, I used control bases. Less costly and they are 4 in one(rotator, hinge, piston and suspension).
@Sense2 does it work now?
@Halcyon215 barak 1, as far as I remember is jointly developed by Israel and india, and they both use it. Or was it barak 8? I don't really remember. Is there a barak 8 to begin with?
@Sense2 it's bugged then.
Go to the overload menu of the button/switch > button/switch and add interactionType and set that to Toggle.
If it's already done then it's probably a bug.
@YarisSedan uhh. But why though? Is it a threat to national security or what?
How do you people make things under 100 parts and still make it look good?
My fuselage alone can near 100.
😂
@Maajidin no problem ;)
@cooldude321 if it's better, then no need to stop.
@cooldude321 uh
Homeschooled, as if you are taught everything at home?
@V ohh. I should have known that.
But why?
All mods are inside the "mods" Folder. Or you could search for them in the files. If you remember their file extension, it will make things easier for you.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 i was unsure what blueprint I had back then. So i just left it as "foxhound".
Maybe I will make a proper MIG-31 later.
Looks good
How to overthrow the government?
.
.
.
I won't be taking questions
gais?
@SPsidearm that's a good way to break your game.
@SPsidearm uhhh.... Just grab an interceptor.
Finally, the martian decided to make something.
Probably a weaker version of the in game interceptor.
@Halcyon215 not that i know of.
If you can make it go fast enough , it will go through the terrain.
@Lestout the AI is talking about the wrong fighter, buddy.
@BARREND ho ho hooo
Center mass maybe too forward. Try to keep it in the middle or slightly behind the floaters. That will also help with take off.
@BARREND alright
You mean something like this?
It is possible. You will need lot of funky trees.
Huh?
Tried restarting the game?
Probably something to do with the text label over there. You do have a backup, right?
Simply put, it's just simple.
Use blueprints or reference images.
The part about this being "mobile friendly" is not a lie. Granted, you have to play with graphics settings low and without too many AI aircrafts spawned in. And you know what's the craziest part? my 2gb ram phone, which is more than 5 years old, could run this on max settings. Of course shadow and physics was at low and no other aircraft was spawned in. But still,it ran pretty well.
@Erc90F4RU part count isn't that much of a problem. As long as you can keep the performance cost around 2k, you're good. Trust me, I was surprised myself. I avoided high performance cost by not using rotators and hinges. Instead, I used control bases. Less costly and they are 4 in one(rotator, hinge, piston and suspension).
@YarisSedan you got it
I can't get too ambitious either, because of my phone that's basically a potato cosplaying as a mobile.
once you start warthuder, there is no stopping. Whether you like it or not.
Why though?
@LoganAviation there is just no way that the government doesn't know what they are.
It's definitely the US government and they are definitely trying to hide something else.
@Yoinkus go to your engines variable menu and give it a variable output. And use that variable as the input.
There is no way of turning of engine sounds. Atleast, I don't know any.
I have no idea how it happened.
@KevincastleSP that's the neet part, I don't remember following.
You didn't put any input in it. By default, they only show the RPM of heli rotors.
How did I get a notification on this post? why did I get a notification on this post?
@YarisSedan you did. And get pinned.
@ShinyGemsBro 😭