25.6k Mustang51 Comments

  • Me-109E 5.6 years ago

    @yuri26 cool! There’s been a lot more WT players here lately

  • Name Help!!!! OVER 5.6 years ago

    @teodor99 I can’t actually see it anymore since my notifications are full (from other things too) but probably like 18-20 hahaha

  • Mig-17 5.6 years ago

    @BillyTheKid1138 it’s not about different goals. It’s about what constitutes as “better” since there is no objective answer when it comes to this. However, stating that your unrealistic plane flies better than realistic ones is objectively false as this is something which can be measured. When it comes to replicas, realism is better (hence the name replica)

  • prototype 26 5.6 years ago

    I gave you a few for the excess you gave me. Thanks again!

  • Name Help!!!! OVER 5.6 years ago

    @teodor99 oh my goodness I just looked at my notifications and it was just full hahahaha. You gave me more than needed so thanks for that!

  • Mig-17 5.6 years ago

    @BillyTheKid1138 lol you don’t get it buddy.

  • Falcon 9 5.6 years ago

    @ToastyTaco the answer is both yes and no. So you can make the shape of the wings using fuselage parts but you need the actual wing parts to generate the lift. What I do is make the shape without any wing parts and then when it’s done, I add the wings but I scale them down to 0.1,0.1,0.1. If you take a look at my last couple builds and take them apart, you can see what I mean a bit better. If you’d like help working with custom wings though feel free to ask!

  • Me-109G 5.6 years ago

    @yuri26 no problem!

  • Mig-17 5.6 years ago

    @BillyTheKid1138 lol sure thing kiddo

  • Name Help!!!! OVER 5.6 years ago

    @teodor99 lol yeah that’s fair enough

  • Falcon 9 5.6 years ago

    @ToastyTaco no problem! Looking forward to seeing your future builds!

  • Name Help!!!! OVER 5.6 years ago

    @teodor99 hahaha I will but only if all of them come with landing gear hahaha

  • Name Help!!!! OVER 5.6 years ago

    @teodor99 jeez well thanks man! Hahaha. And trust me I know... when I had to give all the upvotes for my challenge it was so damn annoying

  • THE GameBreaker 5.6 years ago

    @Diloph I’ll send you the bill for it if you do 😜

  • Mig-17 5.6 years ago

    @BillyTheKid1138 well not really since It doesn’t perform at all the way a real MiG-17 does. The MiG-17 also was not designed for supersonic flight. It’s max speed was around 700mph. It also isn’t very stable and stalls easier than many other mig-15/17s on this website, meaning it doesn’t handle better. It’s okay to be proud of your build but don’t overdo it.

  • Name Help!!!! OVER 5.6 years ago

    @teodor99 I just saw the rewards system. Does this mean I get 5 or 15 upvotes? Lol

  • Mig-17 5.6 years ago

    It looks alright but no, it does not fly better than any other MiG-15 or 17 on here. The turn rate is far too unrealistic (especially for the speeds which they are pulled at), it’s unstable and stalls immediately whenever harder pitch is induced while at a steep angle of bank, and it’s acceleration is much too fast. The CoM needs to be moved further up the aeroplane for it to be more stable. I will say it does look pretty good for a bronze user though.

  • EXAUSPHUS 5.6 years ago

    This looks pretty awesome!

  • f150 B 5.6 years ago

    This is a really cool looking and functioning aircraft. It flies well at mid to higher speeds, but at low speeds it can’t turn very well without exiting flight. You should move the CoM a little further from the CoL in order to fix this. Also I would recommend making the nose a little longer. It fits the builds shape and size better that way

  • Pelican Sub-Hunter 5.6 years ago

    @F4Mustang thanks man! I remember I had a great time building this one. Thanks for all the upvotes buddy!

  • AV-8b 5.6 years ago

    @Wangpeir I didn’t even have to use it! Most VTOL planes on SP fail to fly completely without their gyro but yours didn’t

  • Ferdinand SAB II A (50mm) 5.6 years ago

    So the idea behind this is pretty cool and it looks good but it just doesn’t really fly too well. It’s can go forwards and sort of climb but turning is impossible. Also if you want an idea for something cool and not too hard to build, go for a WWI bomber!

  • Me-109G 5.6 years ago

    I see you made another. This one definitely feels more like what it’s supposed to be. Nice work

  • BC Beancan 5.6 years ago

    @BraggyCorporation hahaha I figured it was based off the Robin. I’d love to drive one some day just for the fun of it

  • AV-8b 5.6 years ago

    This is a really good harrier! It doesn’t even need a gyro to hover well

  • RJ Industries CR70 Fleet escort 5.6 years ago

    @RamboJutter I’m also very confused as to why this has so few upvotes. I really thought it would be one of your best. This is a build I would normally spotlight but as you know, it’s a little impossible for me to do that hahaha

  • Me-109E 5.6 years ago

    This is a really cool looking aeroplane! The nose doesn’t feel like the 109E version (maybe more of a G) but it still looks great!

  • B-1 standard 5.6 years ago

    @MaximilianTheThirst hahaha it’s not about being famous but it’s just nice when everyone is able to use a build. But that’s fair enough

  • Name Help!!!! OVER 5.6 years ago

    @teodor99 awesome! I’m really glad you liked the names and the others are great too!

  • pull my finger 5.6 years ago

    @Diloph that was actually pretty cool. No lag and my phone is happy

  • pull my finger 5.6 years ago

    @Diloph this is going to destroy my phone isn’t it?

  • J-8II 5.6 years ago

    @410461765 no problem!

  • MK-630AutoFlightSystem 5.6 years ago

    This is pretty cool! You should put some more instructions on how each part is used like saying roughly how far from the runway you need to be to use the auto landing. Also at what altitude to engage it at for each runway

  • cruising plane 5.6 years ago

    @Mechboy9000 post it unlisted and tag me in the comments

  • TB-10 5.6 years ago

    @GERMANGAMER1 it’s always good to have the right amount of space between the CoM and CoL. The perfect spot is different on each aircraft but play around with the wings and deadweight until it flies the best. Take a look at where the CoM and CoL are on some of my builds for examples if you’d like

  • TB-10 5.6 years ago

    It might not be a BF-110 but it does look really cool! It flies alright but it would be better if the CoL was a little more to the rear

  • Cessna 208B Super Cargomaster (FedEx Feeder) 5.6 years ago

    This is a lovely build!

  • Lockheed L1011 5.6 years ago

    This is a cool build. Did you make it yourself?

  • J-8II 5.6 years ago

    This is really well made! The profile is great, there’s a good amount of detail, and the cockpit canopy shape is perfect!

  • Rotodyne 5.6 years ago

    This is a really cool build! Very ambitious one too but you made it really well

  • Sandstorm 5.6 years ago

    Okay that’s fair enough then. If you give it more wing area it’ll move even better in that case

  • Sandstorm 5.6 years ago

    So this looks really good but it’s CoM needs to be moved forward quite a bit. If you do that, it will be stable

  • AC-M47E Libellule (MR) 5.6 years ago

    This seems to be the exact same plane as it’s predecessor. You might want to take a look at the rules. Click here to read them

  • Curtiss P-48 Hammerhead 5.6 years ago

    @Brendorkus thanks for all the upvotes! I appreciate it

  • TW Spotter Plane2 5.6 years ago

    Cool build! It’s a really nice looking plane

  • Flying Warship 5.6 years ago

    This is really pretty awesome!

  • cruising plane 5.6 years ago

    @Mechboy9000 just a propellor. A normal one is also called a tractor propellor and a backwards one is called a pusher. Try making a pusher one maybe. That would look cool. Look up the Avanti 180

  • Trintess V-40 Divebird 5.6 years ago

    @Brencool35 no problem!