25.6k Mustang51 Comments

  • F-5E Tiger II 3.7 years ago

    This is perfect. Beautiful build

  • F-84C Thunderjet 3.7 years ago

    This is one of the best F-84s I’ve seen on SP! I have an abandoned build of one of these that I feel the need to finish now. The flight characteristics of yours are great (especially the relatively low acceleration and long takeoff roll) but it could bleed off more energy when in a high G turn, especially while climbing. Overall though this is magnificent. Great work!

  • Kloy-63 "Hextor" 3.7 years ago

    @AnIndonesianPanzer I just made a few changes. Took me only 10 or so minutes. I uploaded it unlisted and tagged you so you can see it :)

  • Mustang51 3.7 years ago

    @SussyBreadBoi haha I sent this before I messaged you there

  • Mustang51 3.8 years ago

    @BreadDoBeKindaSus hey buddy! It’s been ages. I haven’t been on SimplePlanes for quite a while. I’m doing good though. What about you?

  • Kloy-63 "Hextor" 3.8 years ago

    @AnIndonesianPanzer if you’d like I can fix it up for you so that it flies well but still looks almost exactly the same

  • A400M 3.8 years ago

    Looks cool but flight characteristics could be much better. The wing parts that you scaled down should have the aileron sections closer to the tip of the wings so that you don’t continue to roll after you stop inputting that command. There is also an enormous number of drag points which, together with the low wing area you gave the area, give it a bad glide ratio. Give it more wing area, distributed evenly throughout the wing, then reduce the drag points and you’ll have a nice flying aircraft

  • Kloy-63 "Hextor" 3.8 years ago

    Decent looking plane but, as you said, it’s flying isn’t great. What will help is removing the pitch control surface in the main wing. This will make it manoeuvre more like a real aeroplane. When it also comes to the cosmetic side of the plane, the stabilisers and engine exhaust lines up too much. If this were a real aircraft, the exhaust (especially with afterburner on) would damage or destroy the stabiliser and elevators. Overall though cool plane!

  • MiG-42 (Twin 21) 3.8 years ago

    @IceCraft what do you mean?

  • Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-105 Spiral 3.9 years ago

    This is really great! I wish we could just copy over builds from SimplePlanes to SimpleRockets2

  • Q3 Kakashek 3.9 years ago

    This plane looks pretty cool but it just unfortunately doesn’t fly well, if at all. Moving your CoM forward of your CoL will greatly help you with this

  • Mig-21 Triplit Air to Air Command fighter 4.2 years ago

    Even more copypasta. Nice!

  • Missile engine ignition 4.2 years ago

    @FeatherWing hey buddy! I see you changed your name. I’m doing all good. Just super busy with uni at the moment. I’m doing my dissertation and it’s taking up a lot of my time. How’s it been going for you?

  • Mig-21 4.2 years ago

    Ahhh yes, le copypasta

  • Missile engine ignition 4.4 years ago

    @FeatherWing I think I asked this there before and it just got buried in all the other messages hahaha

  • Missile engine ignition 4.4 years ago

    @FeatherWing Yup I’m pretty sure I am still there

  • B-20A Aerofortress 4.4 years ago

    @MrShenanigans yup! That’s what it’s supposed to be. It’s really just the front of the fuselage from my B-101 which is basically a jet B-29

  • Fc-912A 4.5 years ago

    Damn this thing flies so good. Fantastic build!

  • MiG-42 (Twin 21) 4.5 years ago

    @Casparcheng for what?

  • XF5F Skyrocket 4.5 years ago

    Sure thing! I can't wait to see it @lilgreen06

  • P-8A Poseidon 4.5 years ago

    Looks very good and accurate but the take off speed and stall speed are both incredibly high, even with flaps

  • MG-A 4.6 years ago

    Damn this thing looks very cool!

  • RJ Autogyro 2.0 4.6 years ago

    I love it!

  • About Taliedo Caproni 4.6 years ago

    Just to let you know, using images like that as your thumbnail for a non challenge post is against the rules. You should have made it a photo of your build because it looks cool!

  • 40k plus feet on Going the distance 4.6 years ago

    @Soviet your username says all I need to know about you

  • 40k plus feet on Going the distance 4.6 years ago

    @Soviet bruh this is 5 years old. Probably older than you are. The only thing unimpressive here is your attitude, little boy.

  • 40k plus feet on Going the distance 4.6 years ago

    @Soviet Mr big man over here with 45 points in three in a half years has something meaningful to say huh

  • 1st Armored Div. Cambington Mk V 4.6 years ago

    Quite a cool build! Lots of unique features that you don’t see on other planes. I also like how you made the bombs. Very creative build!

  • BAE SYSTEMS Vickers D Delta FGR.4 4.6 years ago

    @DOX no problem at all! Remember that dispute some of the issues it’s still a lovely build

  • BAE SYSTEMS Vickers D Delta FGR.4 4.6 years ago

    @FeatherWing oh shoot I sent the wrong link 😂

  • BAE SYSTEMS Vickers D Delta FGR.4 4.6 years ago

    By the way, here is a list of all the possible designations of British military aircraft in case you are interested: click me

  • Cessna SkyCourier 4.6 years ago

    Excellent! It is wonderful to fly and looks great! Lovely improvements

  • The Future of planes 4.7 years ago

    I like the shape of the fuselage, engines, and tail section but in my opinion the wings don’t fit it too well. Then again it’s just my opinion and overall this looks pretty cool

  • Bombardier Dash 8 Q300 4.7 years ago

    @KnightOfRen haha thanks! It’s an oldie but still one of my favourites

  • Save the planes! 4.7 years ago

    @KnightOfRen thanks man! I hope it helps

  • Race Sailing boat 4.7 years ago

    @Project8P8Manager np. Nice to see people coming back after a while hahaha

  • Da Doo Ron Ron 4.7 years ago

    Excellent video! I’m sure this was a lot of work but it would be awesome to see even more short films like this

  • Piper PA-48 Enforcer's evil twin 4.7 years ago

    Fantastic work! A very cool aircraft that seems to be forgotten by most

  • Northrop XP-56 Black Bullet 4.7 years ago

    Man your builds keep getting better and better! Beautiful work my friend!

  • F-86 4.7 years ago

    @Hedero I would love to upload but since I made a new plane while using the beta, there is a glitch on my app where I can’t change the colour of parts. Once that’s fixed though I’ll upload something

  • F-86 4.7 years ago

    @lancelot3340 will you give that a go?

  • F-86 4.7 years ago

    Also I would rebuild the nose using one fewer intake pieces since you can shape and angle one to give it a similar shape to that on the 86. I would then use panelling to shape it up a bit more. You could also make the entire nose section from panelling but it won’t be as rounded

  • F-86 4.7 years ago

    Not too bad! Intake is a little too small and it’s a bit fast but other than that it’s pretty good. Fun to fly and nice to look at

  • Regarding Mass Tagging 4.7 years ago

    @EternalDarkness okay thanks for the clarification!

  • Regarding Mass Tagging 4.7 years ago

    @Stickman Jetstream is great for that. I wasn’t on for about 2 weeks and had well over 200 notifications from that. It’s not as efficient as tagging one or two people which hardly gives you any points anyway

  • Regarding Mass Tagging 4.7 years ago

    @Stickman it’s a bit hard to see something if you’re not on SP everyday or even every week. I like it when I come back on after a while and get notifications from buddies who want to show me their builds they think I will like. Just because I wouldn’t have seen it otherwise doesn’t mean I wouldn’t care

  • Missile engine ignition 4.7 years ago

    @Jorgebr thanks for the help but I got it!

  • Missile engine ignition 4.7 years ago

    @rexzion hahaha if only that was a thing. Look up the piper enforcer to see a P-51 that actually had modern weapons

  • Missile engine ignition 4.7 years ago

    @Grob0s0VBRa oh my god how did I not even think of that on my own hahaha. Thanks man!

  • Missile engine ignition 4.7 years ago

    @BagelPlane is there an updated version with new inputs because i don’t remember it