Naval P-51 Mustang 6.0 years ago

Here is your result for this entry!
Design: 15/20
Functionality: 7/10
Performance: 10/15
Build quality: 10/15
Paint scheme: 4/5
Personal opinion 5/5
Overall: 51/70 (5 upvotes!)

+1

Thanks 6.0 years ago

Congratulations! You really deserve it!

1945-1950 Naval Aviation Challenge 6.0 years ago

Here is the result for this entry!
Design: 12/20
Functionality: 6/10
Performance: 9/15
Build quality: 10/15
Paint scheme: 4/5
Personal opinion 5/5
Overall: 46/70 (4 upvotes!)

Vought F4U-4M Ver.2 Corsair 6.0 years ago

Here is your score for this entry!
Design: 16/20
Functionality: 6/10
Performance: 14/15
Build quality: 11/15
Paint scheme: 5/5
Personal opinion 4/5
Overall: 56/70 (5 upvotes!)

Naval Aviation Flying Wing 6.0 years ago

Here are your results for this entry!
Design: 4/20
Functionality: 3/10
Performance: 9/15
Build quality: 4/15
Paint scheme: 2/5
Personal opinion 2/5
Overall: 24/70 (2 upvotes!)

F2S4-Super Spear 6.0 years ago

Here is your score for the challenge!
Design: 7/20
Functionality: 5/10
Performance: 9/15
Build quality: 8/15
Paint scheme: 2/5
Personal opinion 3/5
Overall: 34/70 (3 upvotes!)

Hal-Tevas Mk.4-KD 6.0 years ago

Here is your score for this entry. I do really like this build but it didn’t feel like an aircraft from the era so that’s why it didn’t score so highly.
Design: 5/20
Functionality: 2/10
Performance: 4/15
Build quality: 7/15
Paint scheme: 2/5
Personal opinion 2/5
Overall: 22/70 (2 upvotes!)

SP-49 "Avalanche" 6.0 years ago

@Noname918181 well that actually happens a lot. That’s why during turn fights, aircraft lose altitude very fast. They keep their noses aimed down so that they retain energy. If they kept heavily turning at the same altitude, they would lose a lot of energy very quickly

Martin Mauler - 1945-1950 Naval Aviation Challenge 6.0 years ago

@SimplyPlain so I want to give you the upvote prize but the problem is that I have already upvoted most of your builds before and now there are none left that I can. If you like you can let me know whenever you post a new build and I will upvote it or over the course of the next couple days I can spotlight all of your builds. What would you prefer?

+1

F7U Cutlass - 1945-1950 Naval Aviation Challenge 6.0 years ago

Here are your results for this entry!
Design: 19/20
Functionality: 9/10
Performance: 8/15
Build quality: 13/15
Paint scheme: 5/5
Personal opinion 5/5
Overall: 59/70 (5 upvotes!)

Kawanishi H11K Soku (1001st Sq. w/ Type 94 x3) 6.0 years ago

Here are the results for your entry!
Design: 13/20
Functionality: 10/10
Performance: 13/15
Build quality: 10/15
Paint scheme: 3/5
Personal opinion 5/5
Overall: 54/70 (5 upvotes!)

FJ-1 Fury - 1945-1950 Naval Aviation Challenge 6.0 years ago

Here is the result for this entry!
Design: 18/20
Functionality: 7/10
Performance: 10/15
Build quality: 12/15
Paint scheme: 5/5
Personal opinion 5/5
Overall: 57/70 (5 upvotes!)

Thanks alot for Gold! 6.0 years ago

@teodor99 congratulations buddy!

OH-12A Attacker 6.0 years ago

@MDDJB it was a good build!

Grumman F6F-3 Hellcat Tamiya 6.0 years ago

Here are your results for this entry!
Design: 15/20
Functionality: 7/10
Performance: 11/15
Build quality: 10/15
Paint scheme: 3/5
Personal opinion 5/5
Overall: 51/70 (5 upvotes!)

Douglas F3D Skyknight 6.0 years ago

And here are the results for this one:
Design: 11/20
Functionality: 8/10
Performance: 7/15
Build quality: 7/15
Paint scheme: 2/5
Personal opinion 3/5
Overall: 38/70 (3 upvotes!)

B.b_SeaMustang_Mk.I(NAC) 6.0 years ago

Here are your results for the challenge!
Design: 16/20
Functionality: 9/10
Performance: 12/15
Build quality: 12/15
Paint scheme: 3/5
Personal opinion 5/5
Overall: 57/70 (5 upvotes!)

Mcdonnell Douglas F-4E phantom 6.0 years ago

Here are your results for the challenge:
McDonnell Douglas F-4E Phantom - Lorileni (Plane is from outside of timeframe)
Design: 3/20
Functionality: 4/10
Performance: 2/15
Build quality: 5/15
Paint scheme: 2/5
Personal opinion 4/5
Overall: 20/70 (2 upvotes!)

+1

Lightning Aircraft Industries LT-70 6.0 years ago

Here are your results!
Design: 12/20
Functionality: 5/10
Performance: 12/15
Build quality: 12/15
Paint scheme: 4/5
Personal opinion 4/5
Overall: 49/70 (4 upvotes!)

OH-12A Attacker 6.0 years ago

Here is your score!
Design: 10/20
Functionality: 8/10
Performance: 11/15
Build quality: 8/15
Paint scheme: 2/5
Personal opinion 4/5
Overall: 43/70 (4 upvotes!)

TV WORKING!!! 6.0 years ago

@FlyinTheSky sure it’s kinda fun

SP-49 "Avalanche" 6.0 years ago

@Noname918181 the performance on this one is great! I really enjoyed flying in it

Highest rated for downloads and points 6.0 years ago

@BuiltBionixInd10 yes I know, but I’m not talking about that. I’m saying for most downloaded and most points, not upvotes

Gloster Lance MKI 7.7 6.0 years ago

I love this build

FAA Javelin FAW 0.9 6.0 years ago

And here are your results for your third entry!
Design: 16/20
Functionality: 9/10
Performance: 9/15
Build quality: 13/15
Paint scheme: 5/5
Personal opinion 5/5
Overall: 57/70 (5 upvotes!)

SP-49 "Avalanche" 6.0 years ago

Here are you results for this entry!
Design: 10/20
Functionality: 7/10
Performance: 11/15
Build quality: 12/15
Paint scheme: 4/5
Personal opinion 3/5
Overall: 47/70 (4 upvotes!)

Hawker Siddeley Harrier GR. Mk3 6.0 years ago

Magnificent build! One of my favourite jets of all time

+1

RicarJet G-1/A StormHawk 6.0 years ago

Here are your results for this entry!
Design: 15/20
Functionality: 8/10
Performance: 12/15
Build quality: 12/15
Paint scheme: 3/5
Personal opinion 4/5
Overall: 54/70 (5 upvotes!)

+1

Fish Hook Sea Plane 6.0 years ago

Here are your results for this entry!
Design: 6/20
Functionality: 6/10
Performance: 7/15
Build quality: 5/15
Paint scheme: 2/5
Personal opinion 3/5
Overall: 29/70 (2 upvotes!)

+1

Prototype Nexus 6.0 years ago

Lovely aircraft! Those union jacks on there look pretty awesome too. Also nice landing gear!

Results for Naval Aviation Challenge 6.0 years ago

@asteroidbook345 that is very true

Results for Naval Aviation Challenge 6.0 years ago

@asteroidbook345 you should definitely check out SimplyPlain though. He has some incredible builds with a great amount of detail

Results for Naval Aviation Challenge 6.0 years ago

@asteroidbook345 he is! He got third place and his other builds did very good too so he scored high

Results for Naval Aviation Challenge 6.0 years ago

@asteroidbook345 I quite enjoyed your aircraft, especially the pirate!

Customisable APC 6.0 years ago

The APC itself is okay but this concept for builds is amazing! I’d like to see more customisable builds like this one on SP

FM-K Pattern Skywhale 6.0 years ago

Very cool looking concept!

TV WORKING!!! 6.0 years ago

This is fire

ARV-1 Armord Reconnaissance Vehicle 6.0 years ago

Great build! Very fun to drive around

Scout Takahe 6.0 years ago

Finally some good old right hand drive on SimplePlanes! Beautifully built as well

Sukhoi Su-25 "Frogfoot" 6.0 years ago

This is really phenomenal! What a magnificent build

+1

Grumman F9F Panther 6.0 years ago

@Hedero no problem buddy!

RJ SeaDestroyer B1 1945-1950 NAC 6.0 years ago

@RamboJutter the cool down feature is the most frustrating thing. “Wait a few minutes before upvoting again”

“Realistic” Sniper rifle 6.0 years ago

Really cool!

+1

1945-1950 NAC Entry 6.0 years ago

@Baldovino no problem!

+1

A6M5 Zero 6.0 years ago

@TheMitsuboshiBoi I think you need more hahaha

Results for Naval Aviation Challenge 6.0 years ago

@emanuelga thanks very much! I really enjoyed your entries

+1

Vought F7U Cutlass 6.0 years ago

Here are the results for this entry!
Design: 17/20
Functionality: 8/10
Performance: 9/15
Build quality: 12/15
Paint scheme: 5/5
Personal opinion 4/5
Overall: 55/70 (5 upvotes!)

FH-1 6.0 years ago

Here is the result for your entry! I tested the other upload of yours but I’ll just leave this here.
Design: 10/20
Functionality: 4/10
Performance: 6/15
Build quality: 6/15
Paint scheme: 2/5
Personal opinion 3/5
Overall: 31/70 (3 upvotes!)

1945-1950 Naval Aviation Challenge Skynight replica (Second Entery) 6.0 years ago

Here is the result for this entry!
Design: 8/20
Functionality: 5/10
Performance: 7/15
Build quality: 6/15
Paint scheme: 2/5
Personal opinion 3/5
Overall: 31/70 (3 upvotes!)

RJ SeaDestroyer B1 1945-1950 NAC 6.0 years ago

Here is your result for this entry!
Design: 13/20
Functionality: 8/10
Performance: 13/15
Build quality: 13/15
Paint scheme: 5/5
Personal opinion 4/5
Overall: 56/70 (5 upvotes!)