Very cool! It looks great but could probably fly a bit better. I recommend adding around 100-150ft^2 of song area more but more importantly making the pitch control surface much bigger. Also, if you move the landing gear forwards to just behind the CoM, it will be much easier to take off with. Great looking plane you made here :)
This is so much fun to fly! You did have the perfect chance to add a detailed cockpit interior though! Overall I love flying this plane and it looks great too
Just to let you know, you might want to wait a little before you make your own challenge. Once you have more points and post some cool aircraft you made yourself, it’s more likely someone will take part. Also, it would be even better if you put a little more effort into building something for the thumbnail of this design. Giving more specific requirements, rules, and prizes (people need a driving factor to enter a challenge and this is usually an upvote prize of some sort) would be useful as well. I hope this helped and good luck in your SimplePlanes career!
since this is a request for help wouldn’t this be better as a forum post and an unlisted version? In regards to your question, reduction of overall wing area while increasing the elevator control surface area should help. If you remove all the wing parts (make wing area 0 except for rudders and verticale stabilisers), I can give it a fix.
@Natedog120705 hahaha no it’s because he usually tags me in builds which try to break the game or go to a speed which causes the game to crash. This was really fun to fly though!
@Trainzo that makes much more sense now. I have also felt that a bit but I didn’t know why it was harder. That explains a lot of problems I have been going through
@FlagsWorldwide great to hear!
@Shippy456 sure thing but it already has a lot of wing area
I love this series you’re making. How would you feel about adding the Dutch flag and maybe the Union Jack too
Very cool! It looks great but could probably fly a bit better. I recommend adding around 100-150ft^2 of song area more but more importantly making the pitch control surface much bigger. Also, if you move the landing gear forwards to just behind the CoM, it will be much easier to take off with. Great looking plane you made here :)
This is so much fun to fly! You did have the perfect chance to add a detailed cockpit interior though! Overall I love flying this plane and it looks great too
Just to let you know, you might want to wait a little before you make your own challenge. Once you have more points and post some cool aircraft you made yourself, it’s more likely someone will take part. Also, it would be even better if you put a little more effort into building something for the thumbnail of this design. Giving more specific requirements, rules, and prizes (people need a driving factor to enter a challenge and this is usually an upvote prize of some sort) would be useful as well. I hope this helped and good luck in your SimplePlanes career!
+3since this is a request for help wouldn’t this be better as a forum post and an unlisted version? In regards to your question, reduction of overall wing area while increasing the elevator control surface area should help. If you remove all the wing parts (make wing area 0 except for rudders and verticale stabilisers), I can give it a fix.
you're*
Something tells me you'd have an overload of business in Wuhan
+1@Lancematt Ahh I see. I get what you mean with MBTs but I’m not sure about the challenger having started being developed in that year
Congrats on silver!
+1This is really well made. Beautiful aircraft!
For one of your first uploads this is excellent!
This plane has a really cool shape to it!
+1Fabulous aircraft!
Beautiful! It’s finally done but the control columns are inverted!
+1@SimpleJoe np!
This is a very cool build! Nice one
This is really nice!
@Lancematt What’s with the 1956 actually?
+1@EnderEye767 yeah for me it was every missile
@Cvpigunguy cool. What changes will you make?
This is a very nice build! Great aircraft!
It’s pretty cool!
Very nice!
+1Awesome aircraft! Well done on this build
@Trainzo wonderful news! I can’t wait to see it. Tag me in the comments of it!
@Zanedavid no problem man! Take as long as you need
@Trainzo I’m fine thank you, and you? Also yes I’d love to try it out!
I do like it! Still I feel like it’s a bit too manoeuvrable, especially at higher speeds, but other than that it’s great!
You tagged me?
Beautiful!
Your CoM needs to be further forward
@ProjectTank well it definitely paid off! You added a lot of little details most people forget to put into their more modern tanks. Nice job!
+1This is pretty cool! Flight is very unrealistic but super fun!
@Aviator007 that’s a bit better now
@Aviator007 you’re very welcome. I find it disappointing that this got so few upvotes compared to what it is. It deserves a lot more attention
@Timplaner what exactly is pa87?
@Trainzo I’m working on a F-84G and also something I think you will like a lot. An SO.8000!
Lovely build!
Wow this thing phenomenal! The shape of it is damn near perfect and the interior is wonderfully built. Excellent job!
+1@Natedog120705 NP!
@Mikey101234 I can't remember who posted it
@Natedog120705 hahaha no it’s because he usually tags me in builds which try to break the game or go to a speed which causes the game to crash. This was really fun to fly though!
@Diloph thanks very much my friend!
+1@Diloph oh it’s so cute!
@Diloph when I fly this will it break my phone?
@Trainzo that makes much more sense now. I have also felt that a bit but I didn’t know why it was harder. That explains a lot of problems I have been going through
@Diloph yup! I’ve been on it for a week or so now so I’m pretty happy with that. I can’t believe this has close to 100 upvotes
@Trainzo The cockpit you mean? It looks really good in the ones you already made before