@Blue0Bull lol this extreme reaction is ridiculous. He wanted to do something nice for a friend, not start drama. While I don't think helilover had the skill of a common silver and that getting to platinum now would be a nice gesture but it would be completely retarded, calling mod on trying to do something nice for a friend because points is absurd. If you don't like it just ignore it.
@InternationalAircraftCompany that's means the people they reject are toxic. That's what I was saying. How do you know whether or not they rejected you?
@Gavib yes I did, but I won't rebutt because I am extremely tired of arguing. Just reread my first line. It means that nothing has changed since the first post to the last. It's the same point with little to no evidence that isn't biased (on both sides).
@Alienbeef0421 because they are a symbol of elitism that I don't stand for. They call people they do not to invite toxic, they assume themselves to be loved by all, and act like people just have to deal with their existence.
I know talk A LOT about the problem and don't present a feasible solution. Well I have a solution now that would I believe would satisfy most people's needs. The group can keep their name and all active users in the group can stay, but instead of voting for new members internally they would vote externally. What I mean is anyone on the site could nominate someone else to be in the group and we, the community, would vote on it. Of course this is likely too ambitious and they would prefer to keep there voting behind closed doors but it is my solution. Make revisions where you see fit and I am willing to compromise. I just want to put this ugliness behind us so please do consider. @EternalDarkness
@Alienbeef0421 ah alas it is the principles, not the desire to be in the group, that grinds my gears. So stop insulting people's intelligence by assuming that this is the solution they came up with to get into the group
lol I have never actually posted anything about the master chat, merely responded to their bs. And don't act like a had a reputation to be begin with. I was a nobody, now I am the laughing stock tho I don't see anyone laughing...
@Awsomur you have no idea. I used to be able to call people f------ retards and they would laugh and call me one back. Now I call someone that and they report/block no matter the context
Videos in Public of anyone that is over the age of 18, therefore a legal adult, without consent is ok but recording of anyone underage in a public space with the consent of their legal guardian is illegal. (American/Candian law idk about other countries)
@PhantomBladeCorp I would rather burn then be in a group that self appoints itself the masters. I think you're elitist because you only invite who you deem to be masters of the game. Those you do not invite then by definition must not be masters and worse at the game then the groups standards.
@EternalDarkness well that's self centered. I am just supposed to adjust because you want me to? No, your group name is extremely elitist and if you hadn't noticed gentlemen's clubs are pretty elitist too. If your group are the masters at the game you must then also think that those you choose not to invite are not masters and therefore worse at the game than you.
Oh I can't wait to see the retards that scream and yell at because you challenged the SP Masters even though you deliberately said that you are neutral.
@Gavib ok well you are touching on a drawn out subject that multiple users have touched on already and have already said the exact same thing. It would be cool if you brought something new to the table. You didn't though, you said the exact same thing the other users have said. You didn't bring any new evidence to the table and for that matter you didn't bring any evidence at all.
Ugh, it's smart to capitalize on the points you can get from the agreeing sheep, I will give you that. Just please stop making these forum posts. We have seen at least 5 in the past week and it is getting annoying. Most of the people who actually think they are using software don't thing it's cheating anyways. So please just stop.
@rcplane well seeing as I don't know you I don't know what you think. I just know what you write and make guess based of it thinking you are serious is a reasonable assumption
@Blue0Bull lol this extreme reaction is ridiculous. He wanted to do something nice for a friend, not start drama. While I don't think helilover had the skill of a common silver and that getting to platinum now would be a nice gesture but it would be completely retarded, calling mod on trying to do something nice for a friend because points is absurd. If you don't like it just ignore it.
Thx @CoolPeach and @JettStorm
Thx@phanps
@Rodrigo110 sure truce
@Rodrigo110 lol all I said it was a box with a nice cockpit. You're the one assuming that boxes are bad
@Rodrigo110 it's a box with a nice cockpit.
@Rodrigo110 you wanted me to make a plane better than your's
@Rodrigo110
Shatslanger said they locked on in the beta and Calvin said they still do for him
Thx@RailfanEthan
Thx @phanps
@InternationalAircraftCompany that's means the people they reject are toxic. That's what I was saying. How do you know whether or not they rejected you?
@InternationalAircraftCompany go here https://www.simpleplanes.com/Forums/View/645061/SimplePlanes-Masters-Reminder-of-our-goals and scroll down
Nose guns shoot out the prop, need to move them closer to the prop
@Gavib thank you for being so civilized. Well played as well kind sir
@Gavib yes I did, but I won't rebutt because I am extremely tired of arguing. Just reread my first line. It means that nothing has changed since the first post to the last. It's the same point with little to no evidence that isn't biased (on both sides).
@Alienbeef0421 because they are a symbol of elitism that I don't stand for. They call people they do not to invite toxic, they assume themselves to be loved by all, and act like people just have to deal with their existence.
I know talk A LOT about the problem and don't present a feasible solution. Well I have a solution now that would I believe would satisfy most people's needs. The group can keep their name and all active users in the group can stay, but instead of voting for new members internally they would vote externally. What I mean is anyone on the site could nominate someone else to be in the group and we, the community, would vote on it. Of course this is likely too ambitious and they would prefer to keep there voting behind closed doors but it is my solution. Make revisions where you see fit and I am willing to compromise. I just want to put this ugliness behind us so please do consider. @EternalDarkness
@Alienbeef0421 ah alas it is the principles, not the desire to be in the group, that grinds my gears. So stop insulting people's intelligence by assuming that this is the solution they came up with to get into the group
lol I have never actually posted anything about the master chat, merely responded to their bs. And don't act like a had a reputation to be begin with. I was a nobody, now I am the laughing stock tho I don't see anyone laughing...
@Awsomur you have no idea. I used to be able to call people f------ retards and they would laugh and call me one back. Now I call someone that and they report/block no matter the context
@Awsomur lol look at the state of this site
Videos in Public of anyone that is over the age of 18, therefore a legal adult, without consent is ok but recording of anyone underage in a public space with the consent of their legal guardian is illegal. (American/Candian law idk about other countries)
General was not banned, he deleted his account
@EternalDarkness hmmm you make a point. I will be back
@EternalDarkness lol so I can't even say your name any more
@PhantomBladeCorp I would rather burn then be in a group that self appoints itself the masters. I think you're elitist because you only invite who you deem to be masters of the game. Those you do not invite then by definition must not be masters and worse at the game then the groups standards.
@EternalDarkness well that's self centered. I am just supposed to adjust because you want me to? No, your group name is extremely elitist and if you hadn't noticed gentlemen's clubs are pretty elitist too. If your group are the masters at the game you must then also think that those you choose not to invite are not masters and therefore worse at the game than you.
@EternalDarkness well clearly it is now causing problems so maybe it's time to change it
Oh I can't wait to see the retards that scream and yell at because you challenged the SP Masters even though you deliberately said that you are neutral.
@Ihavenorealideawhatiamdoing oh then agreed
I lost half of the plane over wright and landed at yeager.
Awesome work
All you said is that it hurts if you put effort into a plane and people think you used software.
@Gavib ok well you are touching on a drawn out subject that multiple users have touched on already and have already said the exact same thing. It would be cool if you brought something new to the table. You didn't though, you said the exact same thing the other users have said. You didn't bring any new evidence to the table and for that matter you didn't bring any evidence at all.
Ugh, it's smart to capitalize on the points you can get from the agreeing sheep, I will give you that. Just please stop making these forum posts. We have seen at least 5 in the past week and it is getting annoying. Most of the people who actually think they are using software don't thing it's cheating anyways. So please just stop.
@Ihavenorealideawhatiamdoing I wish but Dev's said they wouldn't be adding waves
@Awsomur I might keep this reading joke going but it wasn't that funny to begin with
@Awsomur I still can't read so I might have no idea what you said
I might learn to read today so I can understand this.
@rcplane well seeing as I don't know you I don't know what you think. I just know what you write and make guess based of it thinking you are serious is a reasonable assumption
Thx @ShatSlanger
@BaconEggs thx
Make a version of this plane using the WW2 prop
@TheLatentImage I know but I was thinking that a more aesthetically pleasing way of fixing the problem would be better
@Oski np
@MrSilverWolf 172RG
@AstleyIndustries ammo box would explode when shot and hold a finite amount of rounds so you could run out of ammo
@Tully2001 resizeable fuselage fuel tanks that hold more than the standard fuselage block
@Mostly well you did ask
@Mostly ok, you're wrong.
@Awsomur yeah I am working towards my liesence and hoping to be able to solo by the end of the school year. It's kinda a family thing