@DatFiat126Guy19 veri poggers of course, i dare say dussts is one of the best low-part car maker here around and that's still an understatement, he/she veri good, the monarchii approbves lmao
@Speedhunter lmao, on a side tangent honestly the first thought that crossed my mind when the word "Revenge" popped up is the Battleship HMS Revenge/Royal Sovereign lmao
@Speedhunter good choices all around most of em... or of you wanna be severely insane, pick the soviets(cold war), they have like projects with four digit numbers XD
@RAF1 I do apologize, it's just both our thing to raid pretty much abandoned comment sections of an old build nowadays and just ramble nonsense XD, isn't that right sand? @Graingy
@ShinyGemsBro pretty much lmao, someday I'll start, but for now, an idea; I actually had one spaceship that is a part of the previous SOE way long time ago named Aurel-class and it is a Command Ship for what is basically a whole slew armada of Ai-controlled Arsenal Ships and so it goes
@TemporaryReplacement someone actually made a basic calculation from guessing, basically it's (ImpactDamageScalar × Projectile Velocity) ÷ by either 1,2, or 3, so let's say you have a 0.1 IDS and 800 velocity, your cannon would deal at largest 80 damage, while at lowest 26 damage, so it goes, if I remember correctly
@Graingy hmh; the name itself actually started from my favourite manga author, Tsuchiisan, but since people eventually call me chii, tha name started to drift into its own thing and such XD
@DatFiat126Guy19 the amount of hubrisically whimsy this has is slightly less or somewhat equivalent to that particular cursed picture of the DC-10, how interesting
I joined back when cannon was a new thing lmao; but yeah, meme builds tend to get... a lot of attention, one of my friend's build that still hurts his soul is that a Jar inside a Jar inside a Jar(repeat that several times) getting more upvotes compared to other builds he took seriously; I'm flattered lmao, but also, yeah.. I could never understand gen alpha without getting mental damage from the cringe, and I know the wise words that goes "embrace your cringe to become based" BUT STILL NO AGH
the pylons from what ive seen(5 min laziness, i do apologize) from the front, is like somewhere on the edge of the elevators and maybe the wingtips, idk much but hope ot helps or something aaaa
there's also this but idk if it helps
The Lancer was intended to retain the 20 mm General Electric M61A1 cannon as its primary armament, although a 30 mm DEFA gun could be fitted as an alternative. For the ground-attack role nine weapons stations were provided: one under the fuselage, three under each wing, and one at each wingtip. Two Nord Aviation AS-30 missiles could be carried on the inner underwing pylons, while up to 12,000 lb (5,450 kg) of ordnance could be carried on short-range ground-attack missions. Air-to-air missiles designed to be carried were AIM-7 Sparrow (maximum of four) and AIM-9 Sidewinder (typically, six to be carried with a maximum of 10 possible). External fuel tanks of the same type and capacity as the F-104 could be carried on the wing tips and on underwing pylons to increase ferry range.
@LunarEclipseSP its rather interesting... cause i dont know much about 5-6th gen aircrafts so i cant say but i still feel like it rates hella fast for its size; nevertheless, approved, i'll list it soon
@Mousewithamachinegun122 its a shame they do that, makes the Naval section worse kek; on another tangent, MintLynx makes some of the best rocket-propelled Torpedoes here, might wanna check that out if you get around subs
It's quite fun, I like how it performs! however.... the total wing parts it has(14, panels are also counted as wings) makes it non-eligible since it breaks the Ai-spawnable rule according to MAPA, still though, great execution!!
P.S. maximum wing part is 7 wings total, that's why if you check my Fokker Dreidecker, the middle wing is a fuselage piece
@DatFiat126Guy19 veri poggers of course, i dare say dussts is one of the best low-part car maker here around and that's still an understatement, he/she veri good, the monarchii approbves lmao
+2@Graingy yum!!!
+2@Speedhunter lmao, on a side tangent honestly the first thought that crossed my mind when the word "Revenge" popped up is the Battleship HMS Revenge/Royal Sovereign lmao
+2@Speedhunter good choices all around most of em... or of you wanna be severely insane, pick the soviets(cold war), they have like projects with four digit numbers XD
+2@Graingy also, m/d/y is an unforgiveable sin
+2@TheMouse quite so, honhon, yes yes
+2@RAF1 I do apologize, it's just both our thing to raid pretty much abandoned comment sections of an old build nowadays and just ramble nonsense XD, isn't that right sand? @Graingy
+2@Graingy yeah?
+2@Graingy OH HWAT?
+2@Graingy oh, hi
+2now you're officially a threat, congratulations lmao
+2@ShinyGemsBro pretty much lmao, someday I'll start, but for now, an idea; I actually had one spaceship that is a part of the previous SOE way long time ago named Aurel-class and it is a Command Ship for what is basically a whole slew armada of Ai-controlled Arsenal Ships and so it goes
+2@BYardley you will receive commendation medal for anti-spy duty, and @Dogedogebread13..... your kneecaps are mine.
+2@LunarEclipseSP i mean, if its a joke, but it is a replica of a joke something, definitely PEA-able lmao
+2@TheUltimatePlaneLover placed on the yet-to-be-approved section on the list since I can't test it rn
+2@TemporaryReplacement someone actually made a basic calculation from guessing, basically it's (ImpactDamageScalar × Projectile Velocity) ÷ by either 1,2, or 3, so let's say you have a 0.1 IDS and 800 velocity, your cannon would deal at largest 80 damage, while at lowest 26 damage, so it goes, if I remember correctly
+2@TTL Мой телефон сломан, несвежий сыр.
+2@Graingy hmh; the name itself actually started from my favourite manga author, Tsuchiisan, but since people eventually call me chii, tha name started to drift into its own thing and such XD
+2@DatFiat126Guy19 the amount of hubrisically whimsy this has is slightly less or somewhat equivalent to that particular cursed picture of the DC-10, how interesting
+2@Graingy maybe, who knows; on a related note, NavalBlaze is my very old name lmao
+2@BYardley I mean, it's cheese
+2this is cursed lmfao
+2@Graingy sand
+2@Graingy hi
+2abs >:3
+2@DatFiat126Guy19 DO A SICK BURNOUT AND COVER OUR RETREAT!!! XD
+2@DatFiat126Guy19 that shit so powerful it's a tactical smoke screen XD
+2@MAPA you're truly one of the GOAT of SP, cheers man!
+2I joined back when cannon was a new thing lmao; but yeah, meme builds tend to get... a lot of attention, one of my friend's build that still hurts his soul is that a Jar inside a Jar inside a Jar(repeat that several times) getting more upvotes compared to other builds he took seriously; I'm flattered lmao, but also, yeah.. I could never understand gen alpha without getting mental damage from the cringe, and I know the wise words that goes "embrace your cringe to become based" BUT STILL NO AGH
+2@TheMouse structural panel counts as wings, sadly. (as noted by the fact that they're just inert wing parts with flight physics disabled)
+2@DatTrainAndCarGuy19 oh right, I forgot the ceremonial chant lmao, I was too focused on the half-25-50k thing *ahem*
ONE OF US, ONE OF US, ONE OF US!!!
<>SupremeDorian
lmao
+2@GuardianAerospace @Mousewithamachinegun122 thanks you two
+2holy fwk that is fire as hell DAMN
+2poggers,
ONE OF US, ONE OF US, ONE OF US!!!
<> SupremeDorian
+2something unnoficial
someone's CL-1200
another one
the pylons from what ive seen(5 min laziness, i do apologize) from the front, is like somewhere on the edge of the elevators and maybe the wingtips, idk much but hope ot helps or something aaaa
there's also this but idk if it helps
+2@LunarEclipseSP its rather interesting... cause i dont know much about 5-6th gen aircrafts so i cant say but i still feel like it rates hella fast for its size; nevertheless, approved, i'll list it soon
+2@Graingy SHUSH
+2EH HOI, THE SCREENSHOT TUTORIAL GUY!! YOU'RE BAAAAACKKK (fr, your tut is my favourite lmao, it broke because of discord tho right?)
+2poggers lmao
+2@Mousewithamachinegun122 its a shame they do that, makes the Naval section worse kek; on another tangent, MintLynx makes some of the best rocket-propelled Torpedoes here, might wanna check that out if you get around subs
+2to quote Dylan, "Almond are my second favourite nut, my first one doesnt come from a plant" :)
+2poggers, good to see the AI God return! ( >▽< )
+2@Speedhunter oddly enough, do you know what i think? Fenrir. have the wings BE the twin boom in a way
+2@Speedhunter Sneaky Vixen, a Stealth sea Vixen somehow? XD
+2it's canon now, my expeditionary fleet is probably stuck in port/underway because of a hurricane lmao
+2poggers
+2@Mousewithamachinegun122 it could be, and the ruleset is actually on the bottom of the forum, but i'll copy-paste it here
- Replica(including fictional, but replicas of something)
- 50 parts and below is preferable, 60 parts is walking to the edge, 70 parts is maximum. exceptions may apply until up to 96 parts.
- 7 Wing Parts maximum.
- Realistic performing; if not, atleast semi-realistic; a bomber isn't supposed to turn in a dime, they're heavy.
- no wingtip stall(a.k.a rolling when you pull the pitch, solve this by reducing the control surface of the pitch or reducing the angle)
- I will waterboard you if it stalls when it isn't supposed to
+2@GuardianAerospace ( ^▽^ ) 🍋
+2@HanakoSan that answers it then lmao
+2It's quite fun, I like how it performs! however.... the total wing parts it has(14, panels are also counted as wings) makes it non-eligible since it breaks the Ai-spawnable rule according to MAPA, still though, great execution!!
P.S. maximum wing part is 7 wings total, that's why if you check my Fokker Dreidecker, the middle wing is a fuselage piece
+2