@KatBapa20 yeah... had. I lost it.. however, though it looks different, my [ HMA R101 ] is functionally almost the same. if you need it just to hover then get rid of the sum control part
@Boeing727200F it's.. what's the correct word for it.. indoctrination? no.. propaganda..? no... well, you'd probably know what I mean but like, outwardly they look like "we're doing this to help animals!!" even though like.. bruhh??
@blt have you eaten yet? grab some if you can and maybe something sweet, you deserve it. drink some water, make it a tea if water is boring, or maybe drink packets.
.
hope it gets better for you, stay strong like bacon, as crisp and fresh as a lettuce, and as vibrant and joyful as a tomato!
.
also ouch, I'm on my twenties how dare you
@TheRLAF honestly? fair point. however it is also rooted in.. well kinda sort of an agreement?
.
l o o n g ago, there was someone, a shark, who goes by the name of.. let's just say one of them is messermeister.
.
he originally created a project called "Low-Part Aircrafts" or "LPA" which focuses on well.. fictional low part aircrafts
.
long story short, I created PEA and had a somewhat tacit agreement that came loose? yeah kinda, that I will focus on replicas, and him on fictionals!
.
so why was LPA less popular?
.
it was strict, very strict, which was bad for... beginners and a little bit up!
.
then I had a fictional stunt, and wanted to make a fictional aircraft with my PEA's ruleset, and had to differentiate it so EFA came to be.
.
TL;DR, it was originally an agreement with TWD(good friend) to separate replica & fictional with rulesets, then I wanted fictionals with my own rulesets after a while.
.
it's gone too far to the separation to combine it now. possible, but kinda.... well, it's gonna get busy everywhere trying to correct this, explain that, this, that. there's kinda a reason to separate it clearly now rather than back then if nothing else
@Graingy can attest, but can't complain so.
.
people usually use "torps" but pedos also work I guess, it ain't wrong but ain't right..? well, more it ain't wrong than it ain't right so that checks out!
.
.
anyway, getting flashbanged by that graphical description like(blame the wandering mind disease(kinda, kinda not, I think that's what they originally called ADHD? long before it was named so?), as old people would say), almost 12am here like before I was going to go to sleep,
@RB107 honestly, it's probably procrastination with busy times and all, and I've gotten back to reading manga/manhwas so I don't think Kitakami will come anytime until next year maybe XD
makes me wanna revisit the sailships, but I've got my hands full with stuff, one of em is the IJN Kitakami, THE torpedo queen.. I just need to detail it..
.
I've also built a somewhat-similar sailship actually, but it's a target ship.. Hamernam iirc, but apparently according to shiroh, square-sailed ships don't work well here in SP..
. Hamernam if anyone's curious
@LunarEclipseSP heh, glad to be back!
+2@LunarEclipseSP ahhh, you got me~ yep! Chii at your service ma'am (・∀・)7
+2@lewishasnoiq yeeeee
+2@Yourlocalhuman eh, i don't mind, do what you will with it.
+2@WHNineTripleOne greetings (• ω •)
+2@KatBapa20 yeah... had. I lost it.. however, though it looks different, my [ HMA R101 ] is functionally almost the same. if you need it just to hover then get rid of the sum control part
+1@KatBapa20 hovering is fun, can attest. I had a dieselpubk hoverbike like a long time ago and it's hella fun to play around with
+1@KatBapa20 to be fair, it is funny in hindsight
+1can relate, my walkers are.. kinda ass
+1anyway I'll checkitlater
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover hmmm........ i l l e g a l .
+1@GalmTwoPixy you're batfoxly insane!! clearly MiG-31 *clicks tongue*
+1@LunarEclipseSP yeps, let's boost em?
+1you are very good, low part nice plane!
+1.
@LunarEclipseSP @TheUltimatePlaneLover give this some love, it's neato
@TheUltimatePlaneLover godDAMNIT THAT MEME EVERYONE WHY DOES EVERYONE KEEP SAYING IT EVEN MY BROTHER AGH
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph as new as ones that is not here!
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph @TheRLAF @CR929thenewSPplayer read the comment below
+1@LunarEclipseSP @ZeroWithSlashedO @TheUltimatePlaneLover for now it has been created, I'll tidy it up later.
if you got new submissions, can you help me list it in the comments or tagging me on the build?
+1@Boeing727200F it's.. what's the correct word for it.. indoctrination? no.. propaganda..? no... well, you'd probably know what I mean but like, outwardly they look like "we're doing this to help animals!!" even though like.. bruhh??
+1you'd probably like Italian ww2 ships then, d e l i c i o u s
+1@blt have you eaten yet? grab some if you can and maybe something sweet, you deserve it. drink some water, make it a tea if water is boring, or maybe drink packets.
+1.
hope it gets better for you, stay strong like bacon, as crisp and fresh as a lettuce, and as vibrant and joyful as a tomato!
.
also ouch, I'm on my twenties how dare you
@LocalDealer also hi LD :3
+1@SimplyElegant anyway, cashews are batshit insane on how you harvest it, look it up it's funny af lmfao
+1@SimplyElegant c a sh e w is good
+1menthol & spice ice lemonade mix ALSO hot lemon tea HWAHWAHWAHWHAHWHA
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover hellfire it is
+1@TheRLAF honestly? fair point. however it is also rooted in.. well kinda sort of an agreement?
+1.
l o o n g ago, there was someone, a shark, who goes by the name of.. let's just say one of them is messermeister.
.
he originally created a project called "Low-Part Aircrafts" or "LPA" which focuses on well.. fictional low part aircrafts
.
long story short, I created PEA and had a somewhat tacit agreement that came loose? yeah kinda, that I will focus on replicas, and him on fictionals!
.
so why was LPA less popular?
.
it was strict, very strict, which was bad for... beginners and a little bit up!
.
then I had a fictional stunt, and wanted to make a fictional aircraft with my PEA's ruleset, and had to differentiate it so EFA came to be.
.
TL;DR, it was originally an agreement with TWD(good friend) to separate replica & fictional with rulesets, then I wanted fictionals with my own rulesets after a while.
.
it's gone too far to the separation to combine it now. possible, but kinda.... well, it's gonna get busy everywhere trying to correct this, explain that, this, that. there's kinda a reason to separate it clearly now rather than back then if nothing else
@Graingy if you wear a hat inside out, the universe is the one wearing it, not you
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover with ice? w a r m ?
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph y e
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph it do be bunderingly bindering!
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph peak frfr amirite?
+1@Graingy your existence
+1@Graingy BIMPS
+1OH BLIMPS OH AIRSHIPS OH YEAAAAHHHHHHHH
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover @RB107 b w a a a .
+1@Graingy can attest, but can't complain so.
+1.
people usually use "torps" but pedos also work I guess, it ain't wrong but ain't right..? well, more it ain't wrong than it ain't right so that checks out!
.
.
anyway, getting flashbanged by that graphical description like(blame the wandering mind disease(kinda, kinda not, I think that's what they originally called ADHD? long before it was named so?), as old people would say), almost 12am here like before I was going to go to sleep,
@LunarEclipseSP my apologies Miss E, I can't with this device XD
+1@LunarEclipseSP ohoo
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover well, not the worst thing that could've happen :3
+1@LunarEclipseSP mhm!
+1VTOL crafts are a pain to stabilize sometimes tbh but it's always fair game to use gyroscopes. why hard when there's an easy solve method lmao
+1@RB107 honestly, it's probably procrastination with busy times and all, and I've gotten back to reading manga/manhwas so I don't think Kitakami will come anytime until next year maybe XD
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph hecc ya :3
+1hm
+1@Thad23 rather unexpected, hi!
+1@Graingy t r a n s g r e s s i o n
+1*GASP* POWGERS
+1@GONDOR ohooooo
+1makes me wanna revisit the sailships, but I've got my hands full with stuff, one of em is the IJN Kitakami, THE torpedo queen.. I just need to detail it..
+1.
I've also built a somewhat-similar sailship actually, but it's a target ship.. Hamernam iirc, but apparently according to shiroh, square-sailed ships don't work well here in SP..
.
Hamernam if anyone's curious