11.4k MetallicBeef6572 Comments

  • im making an RP (maybe) one month ago

    Tag List #2:
    @XM803ENJOYER46
    @IMCI
    @Mitterbin

  • im making an RP (maybe) one month ago

    Tag List #1:
    @CatdogAerospace
    @KatBapa20
    @Aero72

  • [DUO-RP] world ending. one month ago

    @SPWithLizzie

    ~48000km/h to cause mass extinction

    *edited

  • Mil Mi-17 one month ago

    @SleepyKitty Whatever u wanna do bro👍

  • [DUO-RP] world ending. one month ago

    @BOSSentinel but we're talking about asteroid like forces here, and logically speaking a 3000mph asteroid won't do much

  • I love photo editing :D one month ago

    @Aero72 Yea

  • [DUO-RP] world ending. one month ago

    @BOSSentinel It said 300 but ok. Still, 3000 isn't much either

  • I love photo editing :D one month ago

    @Aero72
    @SPWithLizzie
    @XM803ENJOYER46

  • [DUO-RP] world ending. one month ago

    @BOSSentinel I hate to be "that guy" buuuut the force of a 10mi wide asteroid impacting the duo earth at 300mph wouldnt do much. Lets say theoretically, a 1mi wide asteroid struck Duo Earth at roughly 30000mph (A slow realistic speed for an asteroid), we'd essentially end up just like the DUO dinosaurs. So realistically, 10mi wide @ 300mph isn't enough to wipe out a country, its essentially the equivalent of dropping a big boulder on the surface, no real explosion, just a big 10mi wide hole. So realistically, a laser impacting the surface with such little force would have no real impact on anything, just a big hole. BUT, lets say that we DID impact the surface with the force of an asteroid moving at 30000mph, but instead of 1mi wide it's 10mi.

    YOU WOULD END ALL LIFE ON DUO EARTH. DEBRIS SHOOTING UP FROM THE RESULTING EXPLOSION WOULD KNOCK DOWN THAT FANCY SPACE BASE U GOT THERE TOO. In other words, you'd kill everyone including yourself

    Just thought Id make that known :D

  • [DUO-RP] Jericho Class Battlecruiser one month ago

    @BOSSentinel ok, thx bro

  • Current projects one month ago

    Tag me on the Jericho

  • goofy object one month ago

    Peak

  • [DUO-RP] Jericho Class Battlecruiser one month ago

    @BOSSentinel tag me on an unlisted real quick, lemme see it

  • [DUO-RP] Jericho Class Battlecruiser one month ago

    @BOSSentinel weeeelllll?

  • [DUO-RP] Jericho Class Battlecruiser one month ago

    @BOSSentinel What did u need the hull for?

  • GDLS Abrams X one month ago

    @dekanii Can u tag me an unlisted?

  • C-17 Globemaster III (REMASTERED) one month ago

    @nmdra
    bro logged back on just to say that🥀🥀🥀

  • Simpleplanes Race Challenge one month ago

    @Kingsman472 If both aircraft crash on a circuit, who wins?

  • [PEA] Bell UH-1 “Iroquois” one month ago

    @BOSSentinel strength tag ahh huey👍🔥

  • GDLS Abrams X one month ago

    @dekanii Cool, thx

  • RoC joins the fight one month ago

    @BOSSentinel Look, at the end of the day no one can stop you from doing ANYTHING in this RP, however u should always consider consequences. I'm just saying, don't do anything stupid

  • RoC joins the fight one month ago

    @BOSSentinel @SPWithLizzie Idk where I'm at on this one, 40000 is still well within atmosphere, but they are strikes that cannot be countered by air defense from above airspace, which are also characteristics of an orbital strike, since its in atmosphere it TECHNICALLY falls under international law. However, it is within atmosphere so it technically isn't an orbital strike... ? Idk

  • AG-7E Scorpion Assault Gunship 2 months ago

    @BOSSentinel uhh....

    Yay

  • AG-7E Scorpion Assault Gunship 2 months ago

    @BOSSentinel Funny u mention that... I DO have a version of this with "troops" per say, its not posted but it exists. I can put it out Friday

  • [DUO-RP] Moment of Truth. 2 months ago

    @BOSSentinel I got u

  • [DUO-RP] Moment of Truth. 2 months ago

    @BOSSentinel
    squints even MORE menacingly

  • RoC joins the fight 2 months ago

    @AviationLoverGEEK444 What does "Camanian and Lasa officials are open to peace talks with Europe's Vietnam" mean? That we wanna keep shooting? What about the fact that we already crippled their factories and military?

    Bro what we're saying is that you had absolutely no cause or need to bomb EV civilians

  • RoC joins the fight 2 months ago

    @JSTQ Who is u? Observant ahh pfp

  • RoC joins the fight 2 months ago

    @AviationLoverGEEK444 To be fair, we never explicitly stated that the war was over, we simply ceased our offensive operation and requested peace talks. But there was no response from EV, military or political, requiring no further action.

    Should RoC continue offensive operations against civilians and humanitarian operations in Europe's Vietnam, they will be met with retaliation of an equal proportion. There has been no reported military action from EV, and there have been no formal responses or statements from the EV government. As far as any country is concerned, further military action against EV is strictly prohibited, and will result in retaliation of an equal sort.

  • [DUO-RP] Joint attack on Europe's Vietnam (EV) by Lasa and CS 2 months ago

    @sprunki goofy ahh lil bro, he doesn't have the lore💔

  • RoC joins the fight 2 months ago

    @AviationLoverGEEK444 And napalm is considered inhumane, that's also a war crime

  • RoC joins the fight 2 months ago

    @AviationLoverGEEK444 Its still a war crime, you intentionally bombed civilians after CS and Lasa both declared the ceasing of aggression and willingness for peace talks

  • [DUO-RP] Jericho Class Battlecruiser 2 months ago

    @BOSSentinel 👍

  • RoC joins the fight 2 months ago

    Tag-5
    A.W.A.
    @BOSSentinel

  • RoC joins the fight 2 months ago

    @RedeemedSPer Fr

  • RoC joins the fight 2 months ago

    @AviationLoverGEEK444 bro, the war is over, we weren't even planning on a second attack, just the first one and call it quits, we already hit like, all of EVs air bases and most of their industrial centers, you effectively napalmed multiple humanitarian missions, probably killed thousands of civilians that weren't even targets to begin with, and essentially not just beat a dead horse, but straight up decided to obliterate it. Idk whether to be appalled or impressed...

  • What Would Be Next? 2 months ago

    Interior job prolly. The Abrams had a nice turret tho... u should keep working on it, and don't let one guy tell u its bad and then give up replicas. Just keep practicing at it

  • Should I? 2 months ago

    @BOSSentinel No, lets take this somewhere else

  • Should I? 2 months ago

    @Mrcooldude idk, I was always an HP kinda guy, if you have another reason to get it other than SP2 go for it. Only advice I'd give is that a computer (or a mini pc as it appears) is a long-term investment, you should choose carefully

  • Should I? 2 months ago

    @BOSSentinel It does actually its his post, not yours

  • Should I? 2 months ago

    @BOSSentinel Wdym "Example A"? This isn't even a tag list, AND its a forum post asking a question, where is the problem bro? You're not being clear at all.

  • Taglists; tried and true, or rule breaking? 2 months ago

    @BOSSentinel I'm just not picking up what you're putting down if you know what I mean, like what are you trying to say bro?

  • Taglists; tried and true, or rule breaking? 2 months ago

    @BOSSentinel Can you be a little more clear on your argument? I'm not sure I understanding your meaning

  • Taglists; tried and true, or rule breaking? 2 months ago

    @BOSSentinel I don't see a problem with tag lists as long as they or the post are not point begging

  • Taglists; tried and true, or rule breaking? 2 months ago

    @BOSSentinel

    "It's fine to tag people. Teasers are fine, and if someone asks to be tagged, then it's fine to oblige."

  • Taglists; tried and true, or rule breaking? 2 months ago

    @BOSSentinel
    The post regarding tagging rules, unless there's a different one that your referencing, please link it.

    Read the first bullet point

  • Tag list 2 months ago

    @BOSSentinel
    Cough COUGH :D

  • Taglists; tried and true, or rule breaking? 2 months ago

    @BOSSentinel Nah but the list on your posts was STILL 33 people, AND you had a link in every single one of those posts to your tag list. Why u switching up?

  • Taglists; tried and true, or rule breaking? 2 months ago

    @BOSSentinel Ah yes, jetstream... idk its just my take, mostly cuz I have a tag list lol. Didn't you have a 33 person tag list AND a link to the tag list which all it said was "a comment is a tag" offering NO discretion whatsoever like, not even a week ago? Buddy...

  • Taglists; tried and true, or rule breaking? 2 months ago

    At the end of the day it all comes down to if the person chooses to join, it's not like they are forced to join the tag list. Honestly, if they consent to being tagged knowing that they are consenting to being tagged on future builds it falls on the person asking for the tag, and they can always ask to leave the list. And if the owner of the list does not adhere to that request then it falls on the owner.