@Bird6369 I dont plan on uploading it. It still needs lots of work to be done on it and I dont have the patience for it. I might upload an unlisted version for anyone to try out though.
I’m really curious how this will handle on mobile. As a mobile builder, everything looks fantastic. Of course, with all of these new features, the only downside I see is that an inexperienced builder will be building aircraft with similar quality to highly experienced builders in sp.
@SilverStar I appreciate it! I try not to worry too much about flight models as that tends to give me a headache. I just try to keep the planes performance within realistic limitations.
Could a turboprop count?
@Bird6369 Damn i wasnt expecting that 😂😂😂 Thanks for the support homie
@Bird6369 I dont plan on uploading it. It still needs lots of work to be done on it and I dont have the patience for it. I might upload an unlisted version for anyone to try out though.
@LettuceRob119 Alright.
@LettuceRob119 I dont know exactly. Are you going to fly my airplane until it runs out of fuel to check? 😂
Also curious, how is the range of the aircraft determined?
Going for a medium attacker style aircraft. Similar to a sepecat jaguar/su-25 style.
@LettuceRob119 true
+1@RicardoACE Thank youuu
@Monarchii @TheUltimatePlaneLover Thanks!
+1@ChiChiWerx Thank you! I really appreciate it!
@Ericshideout That would be interesting. Unfortunately, I’m tired of working on this airframe. I’m unsure if I’m going to do any more work with it.
@PannerTerkins absolutely
+1You make me-109 variants like House consumes Vicodin.
I’m really curious how this will handle on mobile. As a mobile builder, everything looks fantastic. Of course, with all of these new features, the only downside I see is that an inexperienced builder will be building aircraft with similar quality to highly experienced builders in sp.
+1@QuiteInactiveWhiteBread sybau 🥀🥀🥀
@QuiteInactiveWhiteBread We have a detective on the scene over here
@Mitterbin @DeadlyDialga Thank you both!
+1@MobileBuilder21 Thank you, I appreciate the support!
@dbqp I could, but I didn’t
@dbqp You’re a funny dude
@dbqp what do you mean?
@deutschFELLA @deutschFELLA Thank you both!
+2POV: Omni-man after mark cracks fatom eve for the 1000000th time
+1Very interesting. I’m excited in what aircraft the geniuses of this community will present!
@PhantomBoltSP true
@PhantomBoltSP Well I stopped making my cockpits VR capable a little while ago. So technically they’re not controllable solely through VR.
@AeroTactical ohhh I see, thanks!
@AeroTactical What is the -/10 for?
@QuiteInactiveWhiteBread Thank you
@SilverStar I appreciate it! I try not to worry too much about flight models as that tends to give me a headache. I just try to keep the planes performance within realistic limitations.
@ArCeon I maybe should have put some more fuel in it, the turbofans inside the plane for aesthetics eat up the fuel very quickly.
@Ericshideout @B1BLancer @WinsWings Thank you guys!
+2Can you say that again?
+3Thanks for featuring my Yak-9! Means a lot!
+2@NTH Man I just saw that, that makes me so happy 😁
@XEPOH Yak-9UT was among the last yak-9 variants. The yak you mentioned was a trainer. I simply meant the last of the yak fighter series.
+1@XEPOH I would assume the yak-9 came first?
@Dragoranos often times it will
@MrCOPTY thank you
I’ll give it go, please and thank you.
+1Finally, a proper replica on the website.
+2@SemedianIndustries I don’t see the difference
+1@Agent1Scope Go ahead.
@MrCOPTY literally
+1@RamboJutter absolutely
Fun to see the behind the scenes. Really neat.
Beautiful design. Very unique. I would only advise adding some sort of airbrake or reverse thrust to slow down once you land in the water.
+1@ellencreech the landing gear are different, it lacks thrust vectoring nozzles, and the airbrake is completely different.
+1@Apollo018362 thanksssss bro
+1