@DatRoadTrainGuy19 i have been really busy this part of the year so i kinda "forgor" to post it. I think i'll try posting it this weekend but i'm not sure. Really sorry for the wait.
@TheTomatoLover sorry man but this barely doesn't qualify. It violates rule 6 and 7. But don't worry, just modify it and repost it.
I know this is supposed to be a joke entry but since it's close to following every rule i would like you to follow my advice.
@TheFlightGuySP thanks, with the vertical stabilizers i was trying to make a YB-49 like plane but thinking about it the airbarkes are better. Do you have an input or an FT code that i could use?
@GyurineMilSystem Ok so is it fine if: 1) my warhead is a shortened version of the boom 50 2) my drone has a maximum wingspan of 6 meters and a lenght of 4?
sorry if i ask this but i'm worried that the drone i'm working on may not respect the rules
@ChamDel78 well i know that but It goes against the streamlined design, It would fit more an 1800's american design.
Also about your second comment, please don't give up, if you like Building trains Just keep Building and improving, because if you don't you'll never become better.
sorry man but this train breaks not one but 3 rules at once, it's disqualified.
it breaks rule 1,6 and 9. but as i said in rule 8 you're allowed to modify it to requalify it.
-So, why i added that special feature? It's because i wanted It to be a little more realistic, this plane is almost as large as a cruise liner, so if a pilot doesn't have a lot of experience landing and moving the plane in specific ports it can be dangerous. I decided to borrow from ships the idea of boarding another pilot that perfectly knows how to act in a specific port. As you can imagine the landing pad on the back can be used both for the second pilot boarding and also for a crew change during long distance flights or maybe also as an emergency measure.
-Now the second part of the comment, you can see i added a drawing in the second screenshot. Would you like to see more of these in my future posts? Also It includes a reference to a movie, you can try to understand wich movie if you want ;)
nice i managed to get third place. Anyway about the problem with my aircraft, Idk what happened, if you use autopilot it start to tilt a bit but i didn't see it lose control during testing. I am sorry that this happened.
truly one of the simpleplanes moments of all time
+1huh?
+1@ToeTips oh that's easy! A circus. (/s)
+1@DatRoadTrainGuy19 i have been really busy this part of the year so i kinda "forgor" to post it. I think i'll try posting it this weekend but i'm not sure. Really sorry for the wait.
+1Here before this comment section eventually turns into a World War
+1fastest updoot in the west
+1@TheTomatoLover sorry man but this barely doesn't qualify. It violates rule 6 and 7. But don't worry, just modify it and repost it.
+1I know this is supposed to be a joke entry but since it's close to following every rule i would like you to follow my advice.
@TheTomatoLover i will allow anything that respects the rules. So if you manage to make something simple that still respects them then go ahead.
+1T
+1@HiddenDeath some bots were hacking some accounts to spam scam links in forums to hack other accounts
+1@TheFlightGuySP Thank you so much, i'll try it out as possible
+1@TheFlightGuySP thanks, with the vertical stabilizers i was trying to make a YB-49 like plane but thinking about it the airbarkes are better. Do you have an input or an FT code that i could use?
+1T
+1@GyurineMilSystem Ok so is it fine if: 1) my warhead is a shortened version of the boom 50 2) my drone has a maximum wingspan of 6 meters and a lenght of 4?
+1sorry if i ask this but i'm worried that the drone i'm working on may not respect the rules
sorry man but i don't know, you can try reading the description of the mod again
+1@CanadianAircraftBuilder you don't, it's secretly an RC plane
+1that's a cute plane you got here :)
+1@ChamDel78 well i know that but It goes against the streamlined design, It would fit more an 1800's american design.
+1Also about your second comment, please don't give up, if you like Building trains Just keep Building and improving, because if you don't you'll never become better.
you ask and you shall receive
+1take my upvote and leave...
+1@MrCOPTY yes i did
+1@MrCOPTY wow thanks, It was really fun :)
+1@MRM19 hey man, i have one question, are railcars allowed? because if they are i may join
+1@Scratchoza yeah maybe it's a better idea, i'll modify the rule to fit this
+1sorry man but this train breaks not one but 3 rules at once, it's disqualified.
+1it breaks rule 1,6 and 9. but as i said in rule 8 you're allowed to modify it to requalify it.
@PapaKernels you're welcome
+1T
+1@BeastHunter well, Sorry to burst your bubble but this isn't going to be an SST. It's going to be supersonic, but not an airliner.
+1COMING SOON
+1really interesting, i'll join if i will find the time to actually build my entry
+1@UserP194 Good luck man. Stay safe
+1nice
+1oh boy, here i go meme building again. I'm in
+1@NathanRaitto thanks and yes the A.C. 3 is coming, to not spoil anything i'll only say it will be massive
+1@Bryan5 great! maybe i'll give this a shot :)
+1hey are fictional designs allowed? or we have to make a replica of a plane
+1cute design, i love it :)
+1Oof i didn't think the plane was this bad in performance, well better luck next time.
+1-So, why i added that special feature? It's because i wanted It to be a little more realistic, this plane is almost as large as a cruise liner, so if a pilot doesn't have a lot of experience landing and moving the plane in specific ports it can be dangerous. I decided to borrow from ships the idea of boarding another pilot that perfectly knows how to act in a specific port. As you can imagine the landing pad on the back can be used both for the second pilot boarding and also for a crew change during long distance flights or maybe also as an emergency measure.
-Now the second part of the comment, you can see i added a drawing in the second screenshot. Would you like to see more of these in my future posts? Also It includes a reference to a movie, you can try to understand wich movie if you want ;)
+1pretty good
+1i'm in
+1@XAircraftManufacturer A
+1@Falkenwut yeah i will probably do that, the fuselage slicer is going to be really useful for my future projects :)
+1Maybe i'll join
+1"there are two ways of doing things, the great western way and the wrong way"
+1funni
+1nice i managed to get third place. Anyway about the problem with my aircraft, Idk what happened, if you use autopilot it start to tilt a bit but i didn't see it lose control during testing. I am sorry that this happened.
+1chonky boi
+1stalins armed fridge
+1@XAircraftManufacturer no problem:)
+1