@Boeing777x yeah i totally agree, now you made me remember of my T.D.A project (triple decker airliner) it was a land based airliner created with the giant flying boat fusolage but it was hard to develop so i left the idea, but i'll return to work on that plane
@XAircraftManufacturer i'll give you a tip: try building a SST similar to the boeing 2707 (delta wing version) it's a good design for someone who have never built a SST before
@BoiBoicleetus69 man just ignore what i said, i never entered someway in a YouTube video and something told me that i shouldn't, but actually there is no problem with that soo ignore that comment.
@MajorSix i understand you, i had to reduce extremely the posting frequency on my accout because of school (from daily to weekly) anyway, i hope you will be able to return to SP soon
guys after the P.A. 42 (this plane obviously) i will post the P.A. 44 because the P.A. 43 is a plane that uses a different shape for the body (it's a experimental blended wing airliner) so i have still to work on it
@Boeing777x thanks for the support :)
@NojusGindrenas thanks :)
cool plane man, you should have probably extended backward a bit the central engine but it's still a good plane
hey man congratulation for gold :)
@Boeing777x yeah i totally agree, now you made me remember of my T.D.A project (triple decker airliner) it was a land based airliner created with the giant flying boat fusolage but it was hard to develop so i left the idea, but i'll return to work on that plane
@XAircraftManufacturer i'll give you a tip: try building a SST similar to the boeing 2707 (delta wing version) it's a good design for someone who have never built a SST before
@XAircraftManufacturer i think you should try to build a SST, i would love to see one made by you :)
noice
@Wherever yep i worked really hard on it
yeah a medium range twin would be cool
+1@freedompilot98 that is litterally what i was thinking while creating this :)
@BoiBoicleetus69 man just ignore what i said, i never entered someway in a YouTube video and something told me that i shouldn't, but actually there is no problem with that soo ignore that comment.
@BoiBoicletus69 ... what the... is this
@Cassius good luck
@BoiBoicleetus69 because why not ;)
+1heyyy that's pretty good!
@BATTLEGAMER101 mhhh i'll try the tall plane :)
@JaeBeansS lol
@MajorSix thank you :)
@MajorSix what do you think about it?
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook LOL does it even take off?
+1Wow guys i was not expecting all these upvotes 🤣, thank you!
@winterro lol ok
cool
+1Cool
@Cyan thank you :)
wow that's cool
wow i never seen something like this on SP. Good job!
+1@OhBoy np, thanks for the upvote
@OhBoy yeah i was expecting that, what you will do about the prize? because i actually won because there was no competition
@KettleKip updoot, to wish you a less painfull work
@MajorSix i understand you, i had to reduce extremely the posting frequency on my accout because of school (from daily to weekly) anyway, i hope you will be able to return to SP soon
P.S. the P.A. 40-3 is still work in progress
@MajorSix no problem
@MajorSix sure
@MajorSix of course
@MajorSix ok thanks
cool engine, can i use it for a future propfan airliner?
@WernsterProductions i am going to give you a little spoiler... it's going to be very WIDE
@WernsterProductions just wait for an airborne aircraft carrier ;)
@WernsterProductions yes now i am trying to build militar aircraft too because i have a lot of ideas for planes of this type
P.S. this is the m.a. 4 because i already made the other m.a. plane but never posted them
guys after the P.A. 42 (this plane obviously) i will post the P.A. 44 because the P.A. 43 is a plane that uses a different shape for the body (it's a experimental blended wing airliner) so i have still to work on it
that's really good!
@Bruhmoment75 no
@Bruhmoment75 I exited to see what it will look like :)
+1wow pretty good modification of my plane
+1@AustinHuang66688 np
cool plane
@ChrisETH thank you so much :)