Looks: 7/10 looks pretty cool, but no cockpit view and the wings are kinda blocky.
Functionality: 5/10 is very fast, but the cargo door took a lot of trial and error, and I was on the verge of disqualifying you. Also, you can xml edit the engines to make them less powerful so it doesn't turn into a bird.
Looks: 7/10 let's be honest... It doesn't look the best, and there's no cockpit view. Also, when the landing gear are retracted, the show up in the cargo hold.
Functionality 6/20 it does have a lot of flares, and a drag chute, but that's about it. You didn't make the max rotation for the hinge rotator 0, and the cargo ramp can go up into the tail.
Also, it has a tendency to pitch up, which is rather annoying to have to keep fixing.
Looks: 9.5/10 is very detailed and futuristic, and actually has a good cockpit view! The only this is that the wings look a tad blocky.
Functionality: 9/10 Is very fast and maneuverable, and has a lot of activation groups! Really, there's nothing wrong with it, except that turning on the engines with activation groups is a bit annoying.
@Trainz448 Ok yeah it was an about takeoff speed
+1@Coco2010 Yeah it has a bit on takeoff idk why. Tho
If you want to be tagged on my next creations say so here
Tag list III
@Zombieripper825
@AviationLoverGEEK444
@MetallicBeef6572
Tag list II
@SuperSuperTheSylph
@mitterbin
@winterro
Tag list I
@X99STRIKER
@schmoovebrain
@mrcooldude
@CarGuy32SP Thanks!
+1@Coco2010 so I win?
@MetallicBeef6572 You deserve it :)
+1@Coco2010 thanks!
@Mitterbin macaroni
+2@Aero72 Well, read the description and give out your upvotes
@mitterbin I'm finished with your upvotes ;)
+2@Mitterbin 👍
+1@planezandstuff Yeah Lol
@XM803ENJOYER46 or Dorian just really likes ur stuf
@Coco2010 How strict are you on this no weapons policy.....
@XM803ENJOYER46 I think that this craft is currated means that the cockpit is VR-able, so that vr players can know if it works
@ethanish 👍
@Mineglacier7251yt Thanks!
@mineglacier7251yt does this count?
@Mitterbin It took so long to add all the seats lol
+1@Mitterbin Thanks! this is my first civilian plane, I hope you like it!
+1@Coco2010 those upvotes are mine!
Tag list III
@Zombieripper825
@AviationLoverGEEK444
@MetallicBeef6572
Tag list II
@SuperSuperTheSylph
@mitterbin
@winterro
Tag list I
@X99STRIKER
@schmoovebrain
@mrcooldude
@Mineglacier7251yt Done!
@Coco2010 sorry but the challenge is over so you cant do another entry
@Zombieripper825 What? are you saying that I'm going to win because I'm the only one enetring?
@Mineglacier7251yt I'm gonna get me some upvotes!
Also what's the deadline. Meaning that after it you can't submit anymore and the prizes are handed out
@Mineglacier7251yt let's see if I win
@supremedorian Still waiting!
@Aero72 looks: 8/10 detailed but no cockpit view :/
Functionality: 8/10 has a lot of chaff and a easy to operate cargo door, but 🍑 it has a tendency to pitch up so you have to mess with the trim
Total score: 16/20 very noice
Looks: 7/10 looks pretty cool, but no cockpit view and the wings are kinda blocky.
Functionality: 5/10 is very fast, but the cargo door took a lot of trial and error, and I was on the verge of disqualifying you. Also, you can xml edit the engines to make them less powerful so it doesn't turn into a bird.
Total score: 12/20
+1@planezandstuff looks: 3/10. Very ugly...
Functionality 4/10 is practically impossible to stop from pitching down, and it also take forever to take off. I doike the cargo hold tho
Total score 7/20
DISQUALIFIED
NO CARGO DOOR!!!
@YuYsukablyat
Looks: 8/10 This is by far your best looking plane yet, and it even has a cockpit view! (A lot of other entries didn't)
Functionality: 6/10 has variable sweep wings, and also is decently maneuverable, but I found it a little more than little hard to control.
Total score 15/20
Looks: 1/10... Possibly the ugliest plane on simpleplanes.com ...
Functionality: 5/10 in all fairness it does have a cargo ramp and Is somewhat maneuverable.
Total score... 6/20....
@Coco2010 DISQUALIFIED
There's no cargo door
@Aero72... Where is it?
As always... @Mitterbin doesn't disappoint! 😉
Looks: 8/10 very detailed but no cockpit view.
Functionality 10/10 has a cargo door, airbrakes, flaps, and much more! In addition to being very fast as well.
Total score: 18/20 ;)
+1Is this an entry?
@Supersoli8 :/
Looks: 7/10 let's be honest... It doesn't look the best, and there's no cockpit view. Also, when the landing gear are retracted, the show up in the cargo hold.
Functionality 6/20 it does have a lot of flares, and a drag chute, but that's about it. You didn't make the max rotation for the hinge rotator 0, and the cargo ramp can go up into the tail.
Also, it has a tendency to pitch up, which is rather annoying to have to keep fixing.
Total score 13/20....
Looks: 9.5/10 is very detailed and futuristic, and actually has a good cockpit view! The only this is that the wings look a tad blocky.
Functionality: 9/10 Is very fast and maneuverable, and has a lot of activation groups! Really, there's nothing wrong with it, except that turning on the engines with activation groups is a bit annoying.
Total score:
+118.5/20 you may have just won.
@BOSSentinel
Looks 8/10 it looks more like a conventional cargo plane then your other entry, but the wings are blocky and the cockpit view is useless. :/
Functionality 8/10 it has a much bigger cargo ramp than the lm200, and also is more controllable in my opinion.
Total score 16/20 this is the one that I'm counting for the challenge
@MetallicBeef6572
Looks: 9/10 very detailed and realistic but there's no cockpit view.
Functionality 10/10 Has a opening cargo bay door, and there's even cargo that can be dropped! Wow!
Total score: 19/20 You may have just won the contest (congrats on gold also)
+1@Mitterbin Thanks
+1Check out my other stuff SleepyKitty
Tag list III
@Zombieripper825
@AviationLoverGEEK444
@MetallicBeef6572