Courtesy of wikipedia
The Tupolev Tu-2 (development names ANT-58 and 103; NATO reporting name Bat) is a twin-engined Soviet high-speed daylight and frontline bomber aircraft used during World War II. The Tu-2 was tailored to meet a requirement for a high-speed bomber or dive-bomber, with a large internal bomb load and speed similar to that of a single-seat fighter. Designed to challenge the German Junkers Ju 88, the Tu-2 proved comparable and was produced in torpedo, interceptor and reconnaissance versions. The Tu-2 was an effective combat aircraft and it played a key role in the final offensives of the Red Army.
You can read the full article here…
This plane has been built to look like the Tu-10 prototype of this plane, so there may be some inconsistencies with the actual Tu-2.
ARMAMENT
And 2 offensive machine guns.
Crew: 2 military florida men
AG GROUPS
Ag 1: enable offensive armament
Ag 2: enable defensive armament, and you can now move the rear guns up and down
(They are mostly for cosmetics)
That’s all!
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On Android
- Wingspan 36.9ft (11.3m)
- Length 34.8ft (10.6m)
- Height 9.4ft (2.9m)
- Empty Weight 10,693lbs (4,850kg)
- Loaded Weight 11,794lbs (5,350kg)
Performance
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 5.086
- Wing Loading 55.4lbs/ft2 (270.4kg/m2)
- Wing Area 213.0ft2 (19.8m2)
- Drag Points 5990
Parts
- Number of Parts 132
- Control Surfaces 6
- Performance Cost 761
If you want to be tagged on my next creations say so here
@TitanVector alrighty!
@SimplyElegant
Make it
@TitanVector I can.
@SimplyElegant
Have You Built An Tu-2?
@TitanVector calling something the Tupolev TU-2 and it looking like a 4 year olds drawing?
@SimplyElegant He Didn't Used Replica Tag.
@TitanVector Again.
Call something a replica, it better be like the original plane.
@SimplyElegant
We Need Those People Whoever Makes This Community a Better Place.
Not Whoever Insults Creators for No Nanometer Precision in Their Work.
@MajorMapleLeaf
I Tried to be Friend with Simply Elegant. But He Still Continues His Way.
And as You Said, He is Telling Millimeter-Precise Standards That He Can't Do on His Own Stuff.
@MajorMapleLeaf none of your stuff is original.
All you do is “reuse” your old ideas.
@SimplyElegant
🎶🎵 You gotta reduce, Reuse, and recycle! ♻️
(Yes I do admit to that I was too lazy to make new cockpits and stuf)
@MajorMapleLeaf also, you do agree that you reuse the same thing over and over?
@TitanVector rules say to be kind. Some cases i cannot.
@SimplyElegant
Just saying. I recommend this approach to avoid verbal conflicts and potential community rule violations.
However, if you decide to continue down your current path, I won't stand in your way.
This will be my final reply on this matter.
@TitanVector I gave my thoughts in a straightforward manner.
@SimplyElegant
Hello again.
I've read your comment and assessed its validity. I can say you are right. your attention to detail and commitment to quality are truly precise.
However, you must be aware that certain tones, regardless of their accuracy, can come across as unpleasant or even discourage people from building with the community. For example, if you recall, I myself reacted strongly to your critiques in the past, even though much of what you said was true.
In my opinion, delivering criticism in a more palatable way could make it more effective. What are your thoughts?
@SimplyElegant ok ok dam chill bro
This is a TU line.
@MajorMapleLeaf All of your planes can use more work than you put in.
@AVWL @TitanVector @MajorMapleLeaf
“Self bias”
MML used the same cockpit from the XX-91 on the HK-2, the GSA, the RU-6, the KX-7 robin.
More,
The GAA-4 cockpit on the GST-1200, the ARI-2, bonus? And on the GST-2900a.
Even more!
MI-17 cockpit on the RP-5 (Which cant even fly btw), the RH-33, and there are bound to be more.
.
.
.
Also, before you call something a ‘replica’ use blueprints so it doesn’t look like a child’s drawing.
@MajorMapleLeaf ok
@avDude4 maybe after I finish grading the last one
Any new challenges?
@TitanVector ok thanks!