@Frenchyfry yea my efforts have been kinda fruitless, tried my best but it didnt eork sadly. Id say, if you cant fix it, XML mod normal Landing Gears just so not everything goes to waste, thats my opinion tho.
@Hpaccelli the wings are a bit small in their width (i think its width, i get confused) and are too far apart, the transition betwen fuselage and engine is too suden, rear stabilizers are too small for the size of the fuselage and the very end of the fuselage is wierd looking imo. But i really like the bomb droping mechanism.
I got a few problems with your challenge's description:
1: When is XML modding "too much" for you? If you gonna allow XML, dont cap it.
2: Why is there a "lag" rating? You already set a part limit, so why do you need to judge lag?
Ill still participate but make it all more clear please.
I dont mean any offense, just givin my opinion
Heres your score:
Looks: 3/10
Performance: 6.5/10
Total: 9.5/20
Heres is your score betwen both entries:
15.75/20
Heres you score:
Performance: 8/10
Looks: 8/10
Total: 16/20
Very cartoony! I like it
Dont say that! Dark jokes are cool to a certain extent
Thats a sick design!
+1Ill review it soon.
Ill review it soon.
@Hpaccelli im just giving my opinion, im just judging on what i think is good looking. Its not going to be a historically acurate score.
@asteroidbook345 oof!
@Burtcrusher ok mate
Yeah!
No problem, it has been fun so far!
@ArcturusAerospace reverbed oof.
@ArcturusAerospace r e v e r b e d o o f
@QingyuZhou no prob m8
Bad was a bad joke. So bad in fact, it made me step on a lego. Jk
What did you change other than just removing the outside panels?
Make that 1009
@randomusername lol. Thanks
+1@AzureCorp AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABOIAAAAAAAAAAAAA
@Sadboye12 no worries pal
+1@Sm10684 aight
Any kind of Go-Kart? Or specific type, like indoor karts, etc.?
Lmao
Thats cheeky!
@Frenchyfry no problem m8
+1@Frenchyfry yea my efforts have been kinda fruitless, tried my best but it didnt eork sadly. Id say, if you cant fix it, XML mod normal Landing Gears just so not everything goes to waste, thats my opinion tho.
+1Ill review it soon.
@Hpaccelli the wings are a bit small in their width (i think its width, i get confused) and are too far apart, the transition betwen fuselage and engine is too suden, rear stabilizers are too small for the size of the fuselage and the very end of the fuselage is wierd looking imo. But i really like the bomb droping mechanism.
+2Currently trying to fix it
+1Geez that is a lot of parts....
@blindspot61 no prob
+1Its cute! Great work!
+1Heres your score:
Performance: 7/10
Looks: 6.5/10
Total: 13.5/20
Heres your score:
Performance: 6.5/10
Looks: 6/10
Total: 12.5/20
Ill review it soon
The main wing is too big but it looks awesome!
@DEN12345 noticed lol
@Sadboye12 no worries my boi
@DEN12345 i get it, just. Idk im just nitpicky with tanks
@DEN12345 that is not a combat advatage. Tanks need to be as low profile as possible.
The turret is way too big for the chassis
@Attc thanks m8! You right on the money!
@Attc no worries mate
@Bob9998 like i said, its the explosions and bullets that lag, not the parts
@JustDatGuy i get what you sayin
@JustDatGuy that, technically doesnt count cuz bullets are separate free moving objects.
@JustDatGuy idk how the lag works for you but aight. Ive never seen lowpart stuff lag.
I got a few problems with your challenge's description:
1: When is XML modding "too much" for you? If you gonna allow XML, dont cap it.
2: Why is there a "lag" rating? You already set a part limit, so why do you need to judge lag?
Ill still participate but make it all more clear please.
I dont mean any offense, just givin my opinion
I think the nose and the halo should be lowered.