@ShinyGemsBro because of the cockpit and canopy mostly. it's the twin seater variant that works like a single seater one. the LG is in different position as well. overall, it's less of a replica and more of a slight redesign.
@jeewood there was only one drone barely used in WW2 and i am pretty sure it never looked like this. your design must have a realistic airframe and that's common sense.
the primary issue here is those big cylinders instead of flat wings, highly unrealistic no matter the timeline.
@S1lly Star Conflict
@MrCOPTY hello there! where's your entry?
oh Hello there!
no description is the most chad move here
+1nice work!
as a Bronze rank build
+2it's pretty good!
nice work!
RATING
Looks : 5.25/10 pts.
Details : 6.25/10 pts.
Performance : 8.5/10 pts.
Weaponry : 7/10 pts.
OVERALL RATING : 6.75/10
+2your engine barely accelerates
something wrong with your code
RATING
Looks : 3/10 pts.
Details : 3/10 pts.
Performance : 4/10 pts.
Weaponry : 6/10 pts.
Functionality : 6/10 pts.
OVERALL RATING : 4.4/10
RATING
Looks : 2/10 pts.
Details : 2/10 pts.
Performance : 7/10 pts.
Weaponry : 0/10 pts.
OVERALL RATING : 2.75/10
RATING
Looks : 2/10 pts.
Details : 2/10 pts.
Performance : 3/10 pts.
Weaponry : 6/10 pts.
Functionality : 3/10 pts.
OVERALL RATING : 3.2/10
i am worried about the roof being too thin
what if some kid throws a giant rock.........
@ollielebananiaCFSP :D
@ShinyGemsBro because of the cockpit and canopy mostly. it's the twin seater variant that works like a single seater one. the LG is in different position as well. overall, it's less of a replica and more of a slight redesign.
@RealMicroZack2024 nah bro
@WinsWings Thanks!
@ShinyGemsBro except it ain't F-5
i kinda like the smoothness of this
you should learn to make custom Ailerons, that would make this build way better!
@IQinventory Thanks!
@Rb2h what mouse
@Playnefan7877 hell nah
@Apollo018362 not really lol
you need to edit the name typo
@TheMouse although not 100%
@TheMouse his work is clever nonetheless
@TheMouse i mean thousand upvotes is rather an overstatement here lol
@TheMouse new to this site?
+1why does it appear better than before.....
+1human without seeing his own hands
+1speechless
@DeathStalker627 np!
so this is what you were using that drone cam on
Cool!
this kinda looks cute ngl
@SilverStar @Grob0s0VBRa mahadi_1440 send me friend request on discord at
mahadi_1440
@LonelySea22 oh right
@MrPanzer quality of work beats time
your pfp from which movie?
@Stephen22 there are still a couple of weeks left until i finally produce the results, so if you finish it by then i'll definitely rate it
@Kangy ah np then
@Kangy bruh, just dew it before i finish checking the entries which is definitely gonna take two more weeks at least
@phrongus np!
@MarvinMars within the next 15-30 days
@MrCOPTY you could have asked for a deadline extension
+1@phrongus what's your progress?
looks nice
+1probably could do better with the wings
but you learn as you make so it's no problem
Last Day Of The Challenge! Closing it soon
i almost thought you hacked the site
deja vu
@MrCOPTY fair enough
+1@jeewood there was only one drone barely used in WW2 and i am pretty sure it never looked like this. your design must have a realistic airframe and that's common sense.
the primary issue here is those big cylinders instead of flat wings, highly unrealistic no matter the timeline.
@MrCOPTY looks promising but are you sure those old biplanes had avionics like a later WW2 fighter plane?
+1