@WarringMunky what is it with you? I'm not here to insult, i don't need to go to such lows to get my point across. i haven't said a single thing to attempt to offend you.
i have merely said that your joke is hard to distinguish because text is close to emotionless. that is all, there is no need to try and convince me that i'm stupid and you're a god
@WarringMunky hate to break it to you but no one can tell that through text.
text is close to emotionless, it's hard to extract emotions from it
not saying you record a video of yourself or smth just don't expect to make jokes like that and give people a laugh
Sim. Arcade just feels gross and boring.
Here’s my reasoning
What is ace combat known for? Lore and enticing fast paced gameplay
What are flight simulators like DCS or IL2 known for? Life like realism, slow paced but rewarding gameplay
With this in mind I don’t have a zoomer brain so there’s that I guess
@Mustang51 yep agreed
the problem with this is that lights are boolean, whereas i need it to be non-boolean if that makes sense.
if there was the ability to have a variable input then this would be so much easier but no simpleplanes isn't that simple
ok first off thank you @Mustang51 for the spotlight, i definitely do not deserve it lol, this is pretty basic and i could do much better now
secondly, @Neruneten21 this system is a bit out of date and i have had ideas for new and better systems which look perform better. though unfortunately like most things, more parts
@Mustang51 honestly fair lol
i'm coping i guess, i've kind of sat back for a bit and learnt a bunch about the game because i figured out all my builds suck.
the yak i posted is kind of a step in the right direction but i've learnt so much even from then. so sp wise i'm enjoying the game a bunch
Absolute nationalist over here but also Australia had their Air Force in Korea
We flew meteors as ground support, along with some mustangs I believe. Australia’s last live air to air kill was achieved in 1952 (I think) by an F.8 meteor
due date?
also your rules are very off
you're basically saying i can make an f-86 that can't be supersonic in a dive because it didn't have a/b
i also would like to know whether replicas are possible because you need either x6 .50s or x4 20s which the mig-15 and other russian fighters never qualified for
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes
i'd argue the quality has decreased, 7 years ago we had nothing to work with, which is how paneling became a thing.
there was much more creativity, most builds actually had a somewhat okay flight model. now most builds drop like a brick or do 20 loops in a second
@Dragoranos right okay
I just find it’s easier to be specific than presume. Because I could build an f-86 that performs realistically and then get disqualified as a result
oh also your rules are a bit weird, the f-86, and arguably mig-15, could go supersonic.
f-86 could pull out of a supersonic dive, but the mig couldn't due to its non all-flying tail.
this might have something, not sure though
The super fortress would’ve been similar to the Flying Fortress, it’s got similar crew positioning so I’d look at all the doors onboard to sort of guess where bailouts would occur
Perfectly fine
Id make another version without all the startups though.
My reasoning for this is that there’s still a large group of people who play for looks not for the game they literally paid for.
My only concern with builds like this is performance cost, it’s pretty hard to run this stuff on a mobile phone, which is a large percentile of the community.
oh my gosh you did the kangy airway thats so real
+4@WarringMunky what is it with you? I'm not here to insult, i don't need to go to such lows to get my point across. i haven't said a single thing to attempt to offend you.
+1i have merely said that your joke is hard to distinguish because text is close to emotionless. that is all, there is no need to try and convince me that i'm stupid and you're a god
@WarringMunky hate to break it to you but no one can tell that through text.
text is close to emotionless, it's hard to extract emotions from it
not saying you record a video of yourself or smth just don't expect to make jokes like that and give people a laugh
when I make a plane fly realistically and it adds realism to it
+1Sim. Arcade just feels gross and boring.
+2Here’s my reasoning
What is ace combat known for? Lore and enticing fast paced gameplay
What are flight simulators like DCS or IL2 known for? Life like realism, slow paced but rewarding gameplay
With this in mind I don’t have a zoomer brain so there’s that I guess
@WarringMunky because people want things to actually look real.
+1WNP is correct
@Mustang51 agreed
@Mustang51 yep agreed
+1the problem with this is that lights are boolean, whereas i need it to be non-boolean if that makes sense.
if there was the ability to have a variable input then this would be so much easier but no simpleplanes isn't that simple
@Neruneten21 sure, it is outdated however so i'd only use it for a flat surface
i need to make a curved on thanks to slicing being a thing
ok first off thank you @Mustang51 for the spotlight, i definitely do not deserve it lol, this is pretty basic and i could do much better now
secondly, @Neruneten21 this system is a bit out of date and i have had ideas for new and better systems which look perform better. though unfortunately like most things, more parts
@Mustang51 thank you!
@Mustang51 haha thanks but i wouldn't say that, before they were very rough, not really smooth, flew poorly, and didn't use any techniques i know now.
+1genius!
@Mustang51 honestly fair lol
+1i'm coping i guess, i've kind of sat back for a bit and learnt a bunch about the game because i figured out all my builds suck.
the yak i posted is kind of a step in the right direction but i've learnt so much even from then. so sp wise i'm enjoying the game a bunch
your did it
+1username checks out
+1Oh hello there
+1Long time no see!
Hope you’re well mate
since last I’ve seen my son, lost to this monster, to the man behind the slaughter
+1Absolute nationalist over here but also Australia had their Air Force in Korea
+1We flew meteors as ground support, along with some mustangs I believe. Australia’s last live air to air kill was achieved in 1952 (I think) by an F.8 meteor
@LieutenantSOT k awesome ty lol
+2due date?
+2also your rules are very off
you're basically saying i can make an f-86 that can't be supersonic in a dive because it didn't have a/b
i also would like to know whether replicas are possible because you need either x6 .50s or x4 20s which the mig-15 and other russian fighters never qualified for
BRUH
+1mr krabs over here
helo i like mone
@phrongus why font you het it tgenw
pogus i want yor dicsord
Kangy#2809
wait so it must be under 50 parts, but it's a 50 part challenge
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes
+2i'd argue the quality has decreased, 7 years ago we had nothing to work with, which is how paneling became a thing.
there was much more creativity, most builds actually had a somewhat okay flight model. now most builds drop like a brick or do 20 loops in a second
@Dragoranos ogey then
@Dragoranos right okay
I just find it’s easier to be specific than presume. Because I could build an f-86 that performs realistically and then get disqualified as a result
I mean it’s because high point users aren’t making challenges much anymore
+2Plus the quality of builds has declined a lot, which is probably why.
oh also your rules are a bit weird, the f-86, and arguably mig-15, could go supersonic.
f-86 could pull out of a supersonic dive, but the mig couldn't due to its non all-flying tail.
this is the most edited map of all time
+3i cannot believe a five year old (wallfish age 5) achieved this level of detail
@AlivePan i canot belive mcdonal dougas did thid I thougt it was wasp™️©️®️
pigpen
+1Flawless method
+1Works every time
10/0
this might have something, not sure though
+1The super fortress would’ve been similar to the Flying Fortress, it’s got similar crew positioning so I’d look at all the doors onboard to sort of guess where bailouts would occur
@Dragoranos your well comb
+1Perfectly fine
+2Id make another version without all the startups though.
My reasoning for this is that there’s still a large group of people who play for looks not for the game they literally paid for.
My only concern with builds like this is performance cost, it’s pretty hard to run this stuff on a mobile phone, which is a large percentile of the community.
I’m joining by the way
+1those filters are uhm
not sure I’ll come back to you on that one
lol i'm applying to be one right now haha
don't worry about me, i've overrun your mark by a mile
+1every 60 seconds a minute passes in africa
this is a truely preventable occurence, and together we can stop this
thank you for listening
i'm entering an f-84 gimme a few hours
+1Read the first line lol it literally says April fools
okay yourwife
mr krabs this entire community has been open source for years
+2your pay wall does literally nothing
megabyte
a few